Is it wrong of Americans to play ''Survivors'' ?
In America, surviving is a game. And they play it where other people already live. Isn't this very very wrong?
Ew, fuck you 'Muricah
Side Score: 1
|
I LOVE AMERICA
Side Score: 6
|
|
|
|
1
point
I want that show to put them in the middle of the Sahara desert, or in some place like Ethiopia and let them try to survive in those places. Or bring them somewhere like the arctic circle, leave them for like a week, and them come back and see who's still alive. And the ones who are still alive, get to go to another really dangerous place and survive there, and the last one alive is named the Survivor. Side: Ew, fuck you 'Muricah
|
2
points
1
point
I don't understand these two options. What does loving America or not have to do with the right to play with your own life, for money that you could definitely put good use to? The argument "We shouldn't play survivor, because we never need to actually survive those situations" is along the same lines as "Eat everything on your plate, their are starving kids in Africa." My playing survivor isn't making it any harder for people in other countries to survive. (If anything it gives me a better understanding of their situation and more incentive to help them, but I digress) Just like eating what I hate won't make anyone starving less starving. (If anything again the food that mom's knew their children wouldn't eat could be gathered together from homes all over America, packaged up, and given to those starving countries.) Side: I LOVE AMERICA
|