#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Is the truth difficult for you?
Yes
Side Score: 39
|
 |
No
Side Score: 43
|
|
0
points
1
point
1
point
I had a christianity phase when I was 9, it was the first religion I ever had. Since then I've been a buddhist, a pagan, a muslim, a satanist, an agnostic atheist and a deist and I still consider christianity to be the most nonsensical belief system of the above. On top of my disdain for christianity I also hate capitalists. People who describe themselves as capitalists are no better than apologists for the status quo who have no ideas or desire for bringing in a "next level" type system which humanity desperately needs. I also hate Brontoraptor, who is you. Side: Yes
2
points
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
2
points
Tell me what the eye of a needle even means. I'd love to hear you explain it to us. Then tell me why you assume the word "easier" means impossible or never done. Then explain to me how supporting Capitalism for my country has anything to do with Bill Gates or Warren Buffet's position in God's eyes. Side: No
1
point
Tell me what the eye of a needle even means. It's fairly self-explanatory if you aren't a raging moron. Jesus Was A Socialist https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ Side: Yes
1
point
Jesus Was A Socialist Except that he never gave away someone else's wealth, didn't feed or help those who came against him, literaly used the term "Jews first", told us people would be given based on their works, described levels to Heaven, had the Jews build a wall to keep out invaders, said Heaven has walls, said you reap what you sow, and said that if a man shall not work, he shall not eat. And the main thing. The Huffington Post is a left wing propaganda machine on steroids. Side: No
1
point
Except that he never gave away someone else's wealth Your problem being that Jesus was an open socialist. Jesus Was A Socialist https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
Except that he couldn't be a Socialist Your problem being that he preached socialist ideology to literally anybody who would listen to him and all of it is recorded in the Bible. because he wasn't political You don't have to be political to be a socialist. George Orwell wasn't political but he was a socialist. Albert Einstein wasn't political but he was a socialist. The fact of the matter is that the New Testament of the Christian Bible is probably the single biggest criticism of capitalism in recorded history, with the sole exception of the Communist Manifesto. Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
So provide us these verses and let us examine them. I already did provide you a verse, dumbass. You ignored it because you're a populist Hitlerite retard with literally zero interest in factual reality. Here's another:- “No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money." (Matthew 6:24) And another:- "Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy." (Proverbs 31:9) And another:- "“And when you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, nor shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the Lord your God.” (Leviticus 23:22) And another:- "And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need." (Acts 2:44-45) And another:- "For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs. (1 Timothy 6:10) And another:- "Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others." (Philippians 2:1-30) And another:- "Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth" (Matthew 6:19-21) And another:- "There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need." (Acts 4:34-37) And another:- "Your abundance at the present time should supply their need, so that their abundance may supply your need, that there may be fairness. (2 Corinthians 8:13-15)" And another:- "And he answered them, “Whoever has two tunics is to share with him who has none, and whoever has food is to do likewise.” (Luke 3:11-17)* I could literally sit here for hours doing this, but fuck you. You're an imbecile who isn't worth the time. The Christian Bible is the single biggest criticism of capitalism in history with the sole exception of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Deal with it, you paid corporate cocksucker. Side: Yes
1
point
No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money Cool. You yourself said a Socialist can get rich, not serve money, and use the money for good means. I personally watched you do that to defend rich Socialists. Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
And when you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, nor shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the Lord your God Right. That's why we have social programs funded by Capitalism and Capitalists. Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need A group of followers with faith who were fed for their faith, not because they wanted on a dole. Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
The redistribution of wealth is the central tenet of socialism you fucking joke Not actually. That's why Venezuelans are poor as dirt eating out of dumpsters. Also, redistribution of wealth contradicts verses in the Bible concerning laziness and not giving to those who won't help themselves. It also idolizes the state over God. Third, taking someone's monetary worth by force to give to someone else refutes the command "thou shalt not steal" and would nullify the logic of God looking to see if you give it of your own desire to. Side: No
2
points
1
point
Then show me a socialist who doesn't want to redistribute wealth The psychopaths running Venezuela, North Korea and Cuba. Oh, and don't forget that Bernie Sanders clown who dodges the question when asked if he should pay his "wealth tax". And then he and Ocasio Cortez literally supported giving themselves a raise. And? Sanders said if you want to be rich too, write a book. Side: No
2
points
The psychopaths running Venezuela The central tenet of socialism is the redistribution of wealth you boring, stupid fucking dickhead. Since two thirds of the Venezuelan economy is privately owned, we can safely assume that either the "psychopaths running Venezuela" are not socialists, or that they want to redistribute that wealth. Jesus Christ, you are just so brutally stupid and dishonest. Side: Yes
2
points
don't forget that Bernie Sanders clown You literally were opening threads attacking Bernie Sanders for wanting to redistribute wealth through taxation the day before yesterday you INSANELY disingenuous corporate fuck doll. Get out of my life, you obnoxiously stupid liar. Side: Yes
1
point
You literally were opening threads attacking Bernie Sanders for wanting to redistribute wealth through taxation the day before yesterday He's the one who's happily a millionaire while you say it's okay, yet demonize it in others. Despite that, he says ideas, and they suck, whether he is genuine or not. He's either a liar, a dumbass, or both. I can do multiple things at once. Thing 1 Point out his hypocrisy. Thing 2 Point out the stupidity of his ideas. Thing 3 Suspect he's a fraud. Thing 4 Still attack his fraud ideas. Side: No
2
points
That's why Venezuelans are poor as dirt eating out of dumpsters. Venezuelans are poor because in the middle of the Cold War in the 1970s, when the country was literally economically booming through oil money which it fed back into massive social programs to feed the poor and house the homeless, western capitalists began shitting themselves that socialism was working and conspired to crash the price of oil. This is all evidenced in the historical record of course, but you're not even slightly interested in what is true, are you? Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
western capitalists began shitting themselves that socialism was working and conspired to crash the price of oil. This is all evidenced in the historical record of course, but you're not even slightly interested in what is true, are you? The price of oil has never been low enough in my lifetime that a country wouldn't make bank. And? We both know "social programs" supported by capitalism is not Socialism. It's social programs supported by Capitalism. The West has this already. There's no reason to prove whether it works or not. The point? You're completely full of shit. Side: No
1
point
I could literally sit here for hours doing this, but fuck you. You're an imbecile who isn't worth the time. The Christian Bible is the single biggest criticism of capitalism in history with the sole exception of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Deal with it, you paid corporate cocksucker Let's assume this were true for a moment. If you believe this, your open rebuke of the Bible is? Pretty damn shitty. Eh nom? Side: No
1
point
Let's assume this were true for a moment. I've just given you over a dozen examples you fucking laughably stupid idiot. Why would you assume it not to be true? You're a stupid fascist idiot who claims to be a Christian as a cover for all the horrible, evil shit you think and do. Side: Yes
1
point
2
points
1
point
You don't have to be political to be a socialist. George Orwell wasn't political but he was a socialist. Albert Einstein wasn't political but he was a socialist Being a Socialist is in and of itself a political act. Otherwise we could place Socialism on the political right. We can't. Side: No
1
point
Being a Socialist is in and of itself a political act No it isn't. Is being a capitalist "a political act"? Are you saying everybody in America is political just because they're capitalists? Shut your retarded mouth. You're a moron and rebuffing your distortions is boring. Side: Yes
1
point
The fact of the matter is that the New Testament of the Christian Bible is probably the single biggest criticism of capitalism in recorded history Cool. Too bad you refuse to show it to us or explain how the "King of the Earth, full of riches and glory" hates wealth in and of itself and gives it as a reward to those who follow him. https://biblehub.com/kjv/john/14-2.htm https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fivecrowns
Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
In other words absolutely no comment on Jesus's views on Roman capitalism. We know his views on Roman capitalism. Render unto Casear what is Caesar's. Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
And you worshipped in the name of Satan. Not Set or Enki. It's complicated, I believed they were all equally real because they were all the same being by different accounts and using different names. The Satan characterization I considered to be a twisted propaganda version meant to demonize him but I used that name because that is what he is commonly known as and no one would know who I'm talking about if I used the other names. It's kind of like if there was another site where everyone called you "ass faced retard" instead of Brontoraptor, you would still be the same guy but everyone would only recognize you by the name ass faced retard. Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
The Satan characterization I considered to be a twisted propaganda version meant to demonize him but I used that name because that is what he is commonly known as and no one would know who I'm talking about if I used the other names You are completely insane, but continue. Side: No
1
point
It's kind of like if there was another site where everyone called you "ass faced retard" instead of Brontoraptor, you would still be the same guy but everyone would only recognize you by the name ass faced retard. I see. You are trying to project your Skyrim name onto me. Not gonna work Factology. You already have the ass faced retard tattoo on your body. No takebacks. Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
My last Skyrim character was a Breton named Avikarthos. Ah yes. I remember when I goat raped this particular avatar with my ass faced retard avatar. It was epic. You scrambled to get away. It didn't work. Your avatar had my child. No abortions in Skyrim. What? You thought you could abort my baby in Skyrim? Don't think so. You had that baby, and you probably liked it too. Side: No
1
point
1
point
2
points
1
point
1
point
1
point
Having no education explains why you struggle so badly with English, even while using a thesaurus Except that I graduated from college, unlike you, and gained wealth, unlike you, and moved out of my parents' home at age 18, something you have still failed to do at age 40. Side: No
1
point
Except that I graduated from college, unlike you Except that everything you say is the precise polar opposite of true. You are an imbecile who sits here turning reality upside down every day. I graduated from university with the highest possible grade and you spend all of your sad little life attacking universities, claiming they are "biased leftist institutions". You're a liar and a moron. Shut your dumb mouth please. Side: Yes
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
