Is wearing fur morally wrong?
Yes
Side Score: 18
|
No
Side Score: 22
|
|
|
|
I think if the animal is killed just for its fur and then you buy and or wear it it is morally wrong. If the animal is already dead then I don't necessarily consider it morally wrong for that individual to make use of any part of the animal but the message it sends(wearing fur is OK/cool/fashionable etc...) could be. Unless you are stuck up in the mountains or some other remote place I find it morally wrong to kill any animal for its fur. Side: yes
Most of the fur in the West comes from China because of their cheap labor. This is why they're becoming the biggest exporter of fur globally. There are no animal welfare laws in China either. If you watch this video you'll agree with me: (Copy and paste if the hyperlink doesn't work) www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueBWi8BL0PQ Side: yes
2
points
1
point
First of all, everyone is buried in their lives, fertilizing the soil, a part of life that is NEEDED for survival. Killing an animal and using it's fur for warmth is just morally wrong. Instead of wasting it's life and showing off a dead animal, there are coats and boots and bags that have FAKE FUR and still look fashionable. So why the hell should you waste an animals life for its fur when you can save it and feel the same way wearing a fake object. Side: yes
|
1
point
3
points
Fur bearing animals are raised, like pigs and cattle, for a specific purpose. 1. They are not abused like some think; they are treated well. Abused animals would offer ragged, ugly pelts that no one would buy; to make a luxurious, beautiful coat you MUST use healthy animals. 3. The fur industry helps farmers and ranchers in a small way. Minks and foxes are fed the parts of pigs, cows, and chickens that they love and we refuse to eat (eyes, intestines, brains and the like) creating a ecologically-friendly product from...garbage! The furs themselves use even more garbage to preserve them; rotting eggs, banana peels, etc. give off certain chemicals that preserve the hide. In a strange way, the fur bisness is helping to keep garbage out of landfills. 4. Real fur, unlike fake fur and other coat options for those that live in a winter clime, is biodegradable. Pleather, synthetic cloth, and other non-animal products used to keep warm use up fossil fuels and will never break down. 4. They are NOT skinned alive, despite what PETA may say. Trying to skin an animal alive is stupid incarnate; it will thrash and bite. Killing the animal quickly and cleanly THEN skinning it is much quicker, safer, and easier. Its also cleaner and less damaging to the fur because a corpse doesn't bleed while skinning, thus the fur can be removed without it being soiled. 5. Animals are killed quickly and cleanly. This is partially to speed up the skinning process, and also an animal that dies painfully and slowly will thrash and be a danger to human workers, and the thrashing might damage the fur. Argon gas is the most used euthanization method. It is orderless, quick, as well as safe and inexpensive. Animals feel no anxiety or fear, and continue to eat from the food plate in the gas chamber until passing out. 6. Lastly, the videos of supposed 'live' skinning. I'm sure you've seen them. Well, sorry to disappoint, but they are STAGED. In this vid, the skinners were paid to skin the animals alive. These are called 'snuff' films, videos that are either staged or altered by organizations to raise money for themselves-which goes toward lining their own pockets and not toward helping animals. For instance, when the video goes to the part where the skinned, still living animal is in the bin, look closely at the other animal corpses. Unlike the first, all the others are pale and bloodless; that is because the other were skinned post-mortum. Animals don't bleed when they are skinned after death, only before. This means that of all those animals, only the one that was taped was the one that was skinned alive. Side: No
2
points
1
point
Wearing fur is not morally wrong but wearing furry animals is morally wrong and also impractical. I mean, you would have to gag them so they wouldn't make any noise and tie their little feet so they sit still and plug up their little butt hole so they don't defecate on you..... It's just not right! Better to take them out before you take them out on the town (if you know what I mean ;). Side: No
0
points
0
points
1
point
1
point
-1
points
|