It appears that Britain has 'invaded' 90% of the world...
So some guy decides to count how much military campaigns we Britons had. It turns out that we have had military in over 9 out of 10 countries in the world, this includes all places where we had a military presence either by force, the threat of force, negotiation or payment.
Instead of naming all the countries we 'invaded', I'll just list the ones we haven't:
Andorra, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Rupublic of Congo, Guatemala, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liechenstein, Luxembourg, Mali, Marshall Islands, Monoco, Mongolia, Paraguay, Sao Tome and Principe, Sweden, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Vatican City.
We probably haven't invaded these countries due to either (1) we didn't know they existed, or (2) they weren't worth invading.
...and that is good.
Side Score: 21
|
...and that is bad.
Side Score: 17
|
|
|
|
1
point
I dont understand how you can joke about war? People are suffering and dying and you joke about it, I would like to see you when Britain gets invaded from all the side and you get bombarded, how would you feel? would you joke about it? Take this debate seriously or its not worth to even look at it! Side: ...and that is bad.
|
3
points
2
points
1
point
1
point
2
points
1
point
Diplomats were sent to Sealand to negotiate the release of prisoners of war after, I think Denmark, tried to take control of Sealand. The act of sending ambassadors for negotiations shows that at least said nations who sent the ambassadors consider Sealand a sovereign nation. Side: ...and that is bad.
|