It's a threat to the U.S. to not accept results of election
Years later no accept
Side Score: 5
|
 |
Only if Hillary won
Side Score: 14
|
|
|
|
|
Hello bront, Couple things. In this great land of ours, I am free to accept what I choose and what I don’t. What goes on in my brain is no threat to this great country. To think it is, is bizzaroland. Secondarily, wanting the president charged with the crimes he’s committed while in office, has nothing whatsoever to do with accepting the results of the election. excon Side: Years later no accept
3
points
1)That pretty much says it all, seeing you created a debate about Trump not accepting Presidential results. There's a word for that, but I'll leave it alone. 2)I've asked you for a year and a half now for even a shred of evidence of anything and? Nothing. Heck I've asked the media, a swarm of libs on debate sites, and even Muelker himself for anything. I get nothing. Nothing...... Side: Only if Hillary won
1
point
The alleged crimes Trump is being investigated for happened pre-election. There is more probable cause to suspect the Dems of collusion with Russia than to suspect Trump and the Reps (given the source funding for the bogus dossier and the way in which it was publicized). Since Trump likely paid off Stormy with his own money, it’s not likely a crime. Even if it were, it’s the same crime Obama committed (campaign finance). I do agree with you that Presidents need to be held accountable for what they do in office. Things like arming cartels with guns that kill Americans, assassinating American citizens, wiretapping Associated Press reporters, or getting an ambassador killed and then, as a smokescreen, arresting a guy who made a YouTube video. Maybe if we did things like held Presidents accountable for literal perjury, we wouldn’t have to deal with Trump as President today. Side: Years later no accept
|
