CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
4
Because she prosecuted blacks Systematic prosecution by race
Debate Score:7
Arguments:6
Total Votes:8
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Because she prosecuted blacks (2)
 
 Systematic prosecution by race (4)

Debate Creator

BaloneyHead(216) pic



Kamala Harris's prosecutorial record magically disappears from Wikipedia

Erasing of Kamala Harris’s Prosecutorial Record From Wikipedia


https://bongino.com/kamala-harriss-prosecutorial-record-suddenly-disappears-from-wikipedia

Because she prosecuted blacks

Side Score: 3
VS.

Systematic prosecution by race

Side Score: 4
No arguments found. Add one!

Oh great. More empty conspiracy theories backed by the sole rantings of an unhinged fascist ideologue quoted publicly as saying: "My entire life right now is about owning the libs. That's it."

So a man who -- much like Hitler himself publicly stated -- has dedicated his life to "owning" libs, is making accusations against libs. Well, that's explosive news isn't it? Let's go right ahead and get that on the front page, shall we?

Bongino's Batshit Conspiracy Theories

There ya go. You're very welcome.

Side: Systematic prosecution by race
PooPooFace(57) Disputed
1 point

The fact that the postmodernists dare to be Marxists is also something that I find I would say not so much intellectually reprehensible as morally repugnant and one of the things that the post modernists, postmodern Neo Marxists continually claim is that they have nothing but compassion for the downtrodden. And I would say that anybody with more than a cursory knowledge of twentieth century history who dares to claim simultaneously that they have compassion for the downtrodden and that their Marxists are revealing either their ignorance of history. That’s so astounding that it’s actually a form of miracle or a kind of malevolence that’s so reprehensible that it’s almost unspeakable.

Because we already ran the equity experiment over the course of the century and we already know what the Marxist doctrines have done for oppressed people all around the world and the answer to that mostly was imprison them and enslave them, work them to death or execute them.

And as far as I can tell that’s not precisely commensurate with any message of compassion and so I don’t think that the postmodern Neo Marxists have a leg to stand on ethically or intellectually or emotionally.

And I think that they should be gone on after as hard as possible from an intellectual perspective, an informed intellectual perspective and this is fundamentally a war of ideas and that’s the level of analysis that it should be fought upon.

And not only is it a war of ideas, I think it’s one that can be won because I think that the especially the French intellectual post modernists are a pack of what would you call them, well we could start with charlatans and that’s a good one. Pseudo intellectual would be good, resentful would be another and then I would also consider them highly, they’re highly deceptive in their intellectual strategies because almost all of them were Marxists student intellectuals and they knew by the time the Gulag Archipelago came out and even before that the nightmares of the Soviet Union and Maoist China were of such magnitude that they had completely invalidated any claim to ethical justification that the fundamental Marxist doctrines had ever managed to manifest.

And so it’s a no-go zone as far as I’m concerned. Intellectually the game’s over. We’ve already figured out that there are finite constraints on interpretation and we also understand why those exist and how they evolved and from the perspective of political argumentation there’s absolutely no excuse whatsoever in the 21st century to put forth Marxist doctrines as if they’re the bomb that’s needed by the "compassionate" that’s administered to the downtrodden.

Sorry, tried that didn’t work. We’ve got a hundred million corpses to prove it and that’s plenty for me and if it’s not enough for you well then you should do some serious thinking either about your historical knowledge or about your moral character.

Side: Because she prosecuted blacks
1 point

The fact that the postmodernists dare to be Marxists is also something that I find I would say not so much intellectually reprehensible as morally repugnant

Great. So your assault on the online thesaurus didn't teach you that intellectuals don't believe in morality (and certainly not your version of it). In fact, most of them are Marxists, as you gleefully spend every day telling us. So we are three lines into your laughably narcissistic 10,000 word shitpost and already you are illustrating your ignorance of intellectualism and belief in a divine version of morality which legitimises every stupid word which leaves your mouth.

None of us have any reason to read through an essay written by a fascist who is essentially just sprinkling various prepositions around his insults to Marxists.

Side: Systematic prosecution by race
1 point

Sorry, tried that didn’t work. We’ve got a hundred million corpses to prove it

OK, I'll bite. So by the same logic capitalism doesn't work either, right?

https://medium.com/@comradefinnegan/socialism-vs-capitalism-death-toll-d19b6187444c

Oh look. As it turns out capitalism's death toll is even higher than what you are maliciously pretending was communism.

But let me guess. It's different, right?

People like you annoy me because you have so much to say, yet you are so, so stupid.

Side: Systematic prosecution by race
BaloneyHead(216) Disputed
1 point

Oh great. More empty conspiracy theories

The pre page and post page have been screenshot and archived. There's no way to dispute objective data that no one denies that is recorded in many other places other than Wikipedia.

an unhinged fascist ideologue

He's a brown man married to a Spanish speaking immigrant named "Paula Martinez", who was born in Colombia, ironically, according to Wikipedia.

So a man who -- much like Hitler himself publicly stated -- has dedicated his life to "owning" libs, is making accusations against libs.

Hitler never made this statement, but as we all know, you are a Marxist, so seeing that lying is a part of the framework of your manifestos, it's safe to correlate why you are lying now.

Well, that's explosive news isn't it?

Kamala Harris's record being pulled is explosive. Her prosecuting a highly disproportianate amount of African Americans as a leftist is even more explosive.

Side: Because she prosecuted blacks
1 point

The pre page and post page have been screenshot and archived.

Did anything prevent Bongino from performing the edit himself?

Exactly.

I'm not interested in your fascist propaganda you unhinged lunatic. Nobody on this website is interested in your fascist propaganda. You are a corrupt little hack and everything you ever write is either a barefaced lie or an attempt to mislead other people. You have no evidence supporting the allegation you are making and neither does Bongino. You're a couple of lying Nazis telling lies. What a shocker.

Side: Systematic prosecution by race