Bill Nye. Simply because I support his argument. It couldn't be any clearer that evolution is reality. All evidence ever found supports it, except one book. Plus, I don't care much for Ham. I did some research on him, and concluded that he doesn't fully understand the principles of evolution. I can add more evidence if someone wants, but for now I'll leave it at this.

I think the debate is silly and pointless, but I do side with Nye. I spent most of my childhood watching his show, and I respect him a load more than Ham.

PS, thanks for banning him Srom :)

Ken Ham looks like a genocidal farmer. Bill Nye looks hardcore.

I supported the scientists, who won.............................................................

Bill Nye!! The wording of the debate topic is odd though. It should be obvious that in terms of a science creationism is not viable as it is not testable. Is it viable within a belief system? Well that is for theologians to discuss.

Since all of evolution could be proven garbage with a single fossil found from the wrong time period (like a modern human skeleton appearing with the dinosaur fossils),, and the fact that this has never happened. I think reality favors Bill Nye, and I hope his ability to debate is good. I've seen people lose debates even though reality was clearly on their side. Go Bill!

I simply cannot be on side of deluded religious drone whose only argument is "bible say so"...