Less Than 300 Years Ago Christians Were Burning Young Girls At The Stake
Facts
Side Score: 9
|
 |
But Mah Narrative
Side Score: 6
|
|
|
|
|
An animal that is killing babies is in the White House. He cares nothing about Central American babies being slaughtered with their mothers and fathers, Thousands of babies are being killed in the middle east and he is supplying the weapons to do it. He made a big deal out of Obama killing a U.S. citizen TERRORIST, but coddles the terrorists with the oil money. He railed against those killed in Syria and turned that over to his friend Putin …. who also can do no wrong. How many babies killed in Syria?? Hundreds of thousands. Still, the Evangelist "Christians" back him. He'd burn Hillary at the stake and feel nothing. There are some good Christians, there are some good Muslims, There are some good Jews, there are some good Atheists. The BAD of EACH are the ones that think they are better than anyone else! Those that think that way will never be "the meek". They will always be the haters, the ones who kill the babies and don't even realize they are doing it! 300 Years ago was not much worse than it is today, its just done in larger numbers, for different reasons and justified in different ways. Sleep well Christians, you have all the excuses you need, if not, others will be found. Keep supporting Trump, keep looking the other way …. The Lord Trump is your shepherd...….$$$ fuck the babies of the world! Side: Facts
1
point
0
points
Before ignoring this deceptive hypocrite, I will set things straight. What false Christians have done over the centuries in the name of Christ has absolutely NOTHING to do with Christianity. God says in the Christian New Testament that you will know a Christian by their love! Fast forward to today where the Progressive Left supports killing viable unborn babies for any reason! Can you even imagine the kind of inhuman hypocrite it takes to judge others for anything, when they are the animals who support killing our most innocent viable babies. IGNORE! Side: Facts
@FromWithin hypocrite Consider, WayLife (aka Nomenclature) likely condemns Tommy Robinson for exposing rape gangs & other current forms of egregious violence in his back yard, while he (Nom) remains apathetic or even supports it since it is the violence linked to a different religion. That is a hypocrite in practice. Side: Facts
Consider, WayLife (aka Nomenclature) likely condemns Tommy Robinson for exposing rape gangs Consider that the last time MathFan made an argument which didn't involve telling another person what they think, feel, love, hate or believe, it was 1994 and Tupac was still alive. Side: But Mah Narrative
Before ignoring this deceptive hypocrite, I will set things straight. I wrote absolutely nothing which was deceptive. The fact of the matter is that you are a militant Christian idiot so your opinion is quite obviously not neutral on the matter of Christianity. God says in the Christian New Testament that you will know a Christian by their love! And in the old testament he orders his enemies and their children slain in the most horrible ways possible. The fact that you are deliberately omitting information which is part of your own belief system in order to defend that belief system proves that you are crazy. You are very literally dangerously insane. Side: But Mah Narrative
|
2
points
Less Than 300 Years Ago Christians Were Burning Young Girls At The Stake Muslims do worse today in 2018. No liberals care. They just turn a blind eye and go back to their groupthink. Any more fake positions about things you have no actual concern about? Side: But Mah Narrative
If contemporary Christians were burning young girls at the stake and then objecting to similar practices by contemporary Muslims then you would have a point. Instead, you're treating distinct people interchangeably to make your point. Which isn't really even necessary; plenty of contemporary Christians act uncivilly towards others, so there's no need to look back 300 years. Side: But Mah Narrative
If contemporary Christians were burning young girls at the stake Not if. They are demonstrably still doing it. Christian militias in Central African Republic 'burnt witches at stake', says UN report Even if they were not still doing it, 300 years is absolutely nothing. That's literally three, maybe four people ago. If you have good genes in your family and live to be one hundred then your grandfather might easily have been involved in burning young girls he thought were witches. I'll be honest too. You are not doing a good job of convincing me you are that much different today than you were back then. Side: Facts
That was a logical entailment 'if-then' statement and not a commentary on whether it was actually happening or not. I already allowed that there are contemporary Christians who are hardly bastions of civility, so it's a pretty moot counter observation at any rate. Whether 300 years ago is relatively recent is irrelevant because they are still different people. Unless you believe in vampires or something, which you might since you seem to think I was alive three centuries ago... I'm really not sure what to do with that (other than burn this identity and reinvent myself again - you found me out!). Side: Facts
|
