Sounds good, would you like to start the debate or shall I? I would prefer to take the side of communism :P

I would enjoy reading that debate, I'll keep an eye out for it.

Jolly good. My apologies I've been away for so long...

I would prefer someone who actually accepts creationism. I'll take you up on your offer if I can't find any.

I am a secular determinist myself. If you are interested in non-secular determinism then we could have ourselves a debate though. I would have a difficult time convincingly defending either free will or non-secular determinism though.

Narrowing down mental illness. I could take a few tracts with that. Perhaps it would work best if I present some of my views and see if you disagree with any? I am against the DSM and ICD diagnostic manuals. I support community based care models but am in favor of a concurrent institutionalization system of care. I think mental health care should be a public health priority and guaranteed right. I support increased autonomy in care choices and reduced dependency upon the prescription of medications. I support non-discrimination policies and law. I also have strong views on the criminalization of mental illness and how the mentally ill are handled in the criminal legal system and corrections. Does that help at all? Anything resonate or stick out as interesting?

I realize this was sometime ago, but if you are still at all interested let me know. Potential issues: legal benefits, mental health diagnosis, choice vs. genetics, etc. I am fairly open to suggestions.

Your position is that they are inherently living organisms? That is my view on the position as well. I personally deem them as living, but apparently it doesn't fit the universal definition.

Actually I would be arguing against creationism