CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
My friend has recommended this for a long time, and I have finally found this amazing article which is well organized, and clear to understand. I also study 토토사이트 so you will probably be able to find my huge information.
A probably false lie by a politician is the norm. That's why we don't trust them and we have a media that constantly challenges them.
Private false lies by the media that are then covertly altered before accountability can occur is a bigger problem. That big problem is magnified when the media in question favors a political position.
Trust in media is now rock bottom, and they earned it. But that also means that people go finding facts wherever they can. And they choose "facts" that suit their bias, including fantastic conspiracy theories.
The media needs to earn our trust again. We all need them to.
The media needs to earn our trust again. We all need them to.
Hello A:
Let's call a spade a spade.. Exactly WHO in the media needs to earn your trust again?? Tucker Carlson??? Sean Hannity?? The recently dead, Rush Limprod???
Nahhh... They're not the ones.. They're the ones telling you who NOT to believe, and you believe that. And, right now, they're telling you NOT to believe Dr. Fauci.
Now, THAT media will NEVER, EVER, EVER earn my trust.
Dr Fauci switched his professional opinion often. Sometimes it was found that he had presented a "noble lie" to protect the public from itself. That's what he did when he said not to wear masks and again later when he said he wasn't wearing his mask for theatrics. It's Fouci's own double talk that undermines him. (And absurd notions of near indefinite masking)
You don't have to listen to Hannity to know that the lab leak has always been more probable and less racist than the wet market cover put out by the CCP. But the folks over at CNN said it's more racist to blame commies than to blame a gross cultural practice in wet markets. And if they say it's racist, then it must not be true. Now we are learning that the lab leak was covered up pretty hard and the mainstream news was complicit.
That's after years of everyone in every new room ranting fabrications about Russian meddling and Trump collusion. All bullshit. And after it was well established that it was bullshit, they went right along with pretending that Trump calling for a legit investigation requires impeachment. The icing on that cake was the full-blown media black out of the Biden laptop story.
As for media trust, Pew research are the ones who show that media trust is at record lows. If that was all just. Because of Fox News, Biden wouldn't be president. People like me (who don't watch Fox), and Democrats alike have lost trust in the news.
Interesting side note: when I was looking at public confidence in various institutions, I noticed that the percentage of people expressing a great deal of confidence in the presidency used to regularly be above 20%. That norm almost went away during the Obama years, but it was starting to recover these last 4 years...you wouldn't know that by listening to the news, but then who really trusts them anyway haha
That's after years of everyone in every new room ranting fabrications about Russian meddling and Trump collusion. All bullshit. And after it was well established that it was bullshit, they went right along with pretending that Trump calling for a legit investigation requires impeachment.
Hello again, A:
There's only one truth.. There aren't two truths.. There isn't my truth, or your truth.. Truth isn't right wing or left. Truth doesn't have versions. It's simply the truth..
The people who told you that crap above are liars, hucksters and grifters.. They sell snake oil and you bought some.
Hmm.. I wonder if they reported the TRUTH in the following case where they ADMIT to LYING their heads off.. Nahh..
I don't watch Tucker so I didn't bother with your link. Everything I talked about was just what was in the news. I saw the news, that's how I know there was nothing to the Russian hubbub. Remember? There's no there there. But also because I saw the news I saw how they played it for three years. I saw the news, which is why I saw what Trump said on his phone call. The idea that there was something wrong with him wanting an investigation was screwy. Would it help him politically? Sure. Does that make Biden less corrupt? Nope. But the immediate and automatic rejection of anything Trump said was justification for impeaching him on that too. That same autoi rejection caused the media to cover for the Chinese communist party and their lab leak. Vanity Fair now has an article blowing it open. They can do that now that Trump bus gone. But not before.
If I bought snake oil it was just the news minus their opinions on the mdtyer. Which means you agree with me I guess. They do peddle some shit sometimes.
You're talking to excon, Amarel. The same person who does nothing but move the goalpost, insult, banter with straw-man arguments & fallacies. All while not directly addressing the topic of the discussion.
I didn't even get into the obvious dishonesty that we all witnessed all last year while cities burned and news reporters would stand before the carnage and call it mostly peaceful. Sure excon, Fox has duped us.
Even if you got into it, exon would ignore it because it's something that simply blows a nice fat hole in their own side of the argument.
Hello again, Dr.
Actually, that's the POINT of my argument..
The media you ascribe to told you that Hunter Biden and his corrupt father STOLE the election, and would be in jail, if it weren't for a corrupt FBI, and a corrupt Justice Department, ALL of whom are deep staters, who're out to get Trump at all costs..
The media I ascribe to tells me that IF there were evidence of a crime, the FBI and the Justice Department, who're NOT in the deep state, WOULD have brought charges.. That there were NO charges simply means there was NO evidence.
In the REAL world, that's what happened, and that's what was reported by the media I ascribe to.. Those facts, on the ground, blows holes in somebody's argument, and it's not mine..
Now, I've been reading where your hair is on fire because the BLM RIOTERS are coming to your city.. And I wonder how you could get so much, so wrong... Then I flip onto Tucker Carlson, and Sean Hannity, and I see WHY you believe the crap you do. That's because they selectively report what ONLY 7% of protestors DID. Truly. TRULY!! If that's ALL that was reported in the media you ascribe to, you'd BELIEVE the entire Black Lives Matter movement is made up VIOLENT criminals bent on rioting every chance they get..
And, you DO!
Now, I'm SURE you'll say that Time Incorporated is IN the clutches of the DEEP STATE and cannot be believed.. And, I'll snicker a little bit..
I don't really watch Tucker and I haven't seen anything from Hannity in possibly over a decade. So there's another direct lie of yours shot down once again.
-As for the ACLED's study. There are more than a few issues any critical thinking person could come up with here.
1. Being the spotty nature of their findings. Seeing as it's also ignoring other violent acts, or even just their repercussion.
2. Which was what turned me off from the study the first time around, is the fact that not only the media turned to using this study as propaganda. Before the study was even completely finalized and when other credited individuals were still putting holes in it's findings. If you can actually call them findings.
3. The file reads more in tone with being pro-demonstration and anti-law enforcement. In fact it reads like it was written by someone on CNN, attempting to clear BLM members of blame. And doing their best to lay blame for the violence on police and right-wing militias. Despite the fact that such militias were not present in these circumstances.
Hell, the ACLED accounts for the CHOP in Seattle. Made up of both BLM and Antifa members. There were two murders, three attempted murders, an attempted rape, near mass vandalism, and physical assaults daily. And despite riots still going on at the time. The ACLED calls the CHOP a success, and only has "peaceful protest" recorded at that period.
That seems like a rather large hole in their "findings" already, don't you agree?
Seeing as you can't really debate anyone in general, or stay on topic for that matter. I find this a pretty terrible rabbit hole for you to go down at all.
But this is you trying to avoid a simple discussion. Something where a lie just tried to save someone face, and the other could cost people their lives.
If you had any weight to throw around on this issue, you'd do so. But you're simply stuck at making personal insults, and missing the topic almost entirely.
So you're only doing more damage to yourself with each post, not the other way around.
That every mealy mouthed Republican was intimidated by Trump, were afraid to be called out by Trump, were too concerned about their own career, only means they didn't have the balls to call a spade a spade.
Look.. You're no different. With absolutely NO evidence whatsoever, other than what comes out of the orange mans mouth, you BELIEVE the Dems stole the election...
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with extra information? It is extremely helpful for me
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info. 카지노사이트
Nice information, valuable and excellent design, as share good stuff with good ideas and concepts, lots of great information and inspiration, both of which I need, thanks to offer such a helpful information here. 먹튀검증
Wow, excellent post. I'd like to draft like this too - taking time and real hard work to make a great article. This post has encouraged me to write some posts that I am going to write soon.
If I had found this before, my life could be much better than now. Thank you, and I would really like to let you know 메이저놀이터 so that you will feel good.
