Medicare For All... Why?
A prominent claim, and trending topic (especially among the Bernie Sanders' Left), is that Medicare for All is the clear and ultimate solution to remedy the healthcare problem in the states. It has been shown that while MfA may be more affordable to the individual, it is not affordable to the country. Liberal-majority states are voting against the passing of MfA (California, notably) because they are aware of the profound spike that will occur in the debt. Additionally, people argue that 'single-payer works in countries like Canada, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway', when in fact, their healthcare systems are a spiraling mass of issues. The countries that have adopted a single-payer system have profoundly long wait times, poor quality care, and massive co-pays.
So, Medicare for All: Yes or no, why or why not?
|
1
point
|
