Architects:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiseAnneCouture

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DominiqueGauzin-Müller

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZahaHadid

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SheilaSriPrakash

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SarahNettleton

Ever heard of Marie Curie? http://www.nobelprize.org/nobelprizes/chemistry/laureates/1911/marie-curie-facts.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listofelectedorappointedfemaleheadsofstate

In history, also there are great leaders such as Elizabeth I, Catherine the Great, or legendary warriors such as Tomoe Gozen and Boudicca (Also a leader, I know, but I think she was a better warrior).

Your entire argument is invalid. Where, exactly, did you find this information? For example, you so ignorantly credit men with building magnificent architecture and skyscrapers. Ever heard of the One World Trade Center? You know, only the tallest building in the U.S. and the seventh tallest building in the world. That also happened to be designed by Nicole Dosso, a woman. Coincidentally, she was the one who did all the work while the original architects, David Childs and Daniel Libeskind, bickered like children over the tower's design. Interesting, right? And the great scientific discoveries that were apparently all made by men? You forgot about Leslie Thompson's breakthroughs on Huntingtons Disease, Rachel Carson's discoveries on lethal pesticides that saved hundreds of lives, Gertrude Elion, who designed the first Leukemia treatment, JoAnn Morgan, an engineer who played a crucial part in the moon landing, and many others. "There's not any woman who had a hand in any of that" Really? What was your final challenge? Nation leading women? Alright then. Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil, Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt of Denmark, President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina, and Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller of Jamaica. Five nation leaders. Now was that so hard? If that argument was supposed to be a "checkmate", as you called it, you might want to practice some chess. And yes, I realize this is an old comment. But it's still very, very false. I believe in gender equality, but reading comments like this makes me wonder why people ever believed men were superior.

Your dumb. There are women that have fought in Iraq, as well as men. Tailors and artist can be either man or woman.

I totally agree.womenarent equal to men, they are stronger

Emberrr,

I generally disagree with your premise that men are superior, but I don't think your ideas are faulty.

Frankly, the question's scope is a lot of the problem.

Do you want to open pickle jars or move heavy things? Do you want to invent or innovate? Do you want to build pyramids, bridges, skyscrapers? Do you want somebody to go out into a dangerous environment and risk life and limb to help or protect or provide for those at home? Then most (not all) of the time, a man is the superior choice.

However, do you want to turn sex into a baby? Do you want somebody to care for that baby until it can chew its own food? Do you want to motivate men to do all of the things they are capable of? If so, you absolutely need a woman.

Doug Stanhope (the comedian) observed that the reason guys bothered to do all of the hard and dangerous things that brought modern civilization and its accoutrements into being is that they were trying to get laid. I think it is a little more than that. They were also trying to make life better or more secure for their families, primarily for their women and children.

Men are far superior mentally and especially physically.

Mentally: SOMETIMES. The bell curve for male intelligence is far wider than that for women. We do not cluster toward the mean to as great a degree. That means men tend to be either smarter or dumber than women. Sure, there are more male geniuses, but there are also more male idiots. (Just watch YouTube for an hour; you will see what I mean.)

Women tend to cluster toward the mean, with fewer geniuses and fewer morons. As Camille Paglia observed, "There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper."

Regarding physical strength, testosterone is the big differentiator. Absolutely there are a lot of women who are stronger than a lot of men, but there are also a lot of men who are stronger than ALL women. We will see how that changes with the current generation of men who have MUCH lower testosterone levels than 30 years ago.

Femininity represents being fragile and delicate

I think you are misstating your case. Fragile and delicate cannot deal with the severe physical trauma of pregnancy and childbirth. I'm just sayin'.

There is however a pretty big distinction in how male and female durability and weakness manifest. Men's egos and self-esteem are a weakness to a degree that most women do not have. The vast majority of suicides are men. As men are increasingly treated as unnecessary or even inherently toxic, that number is increasing drastically. Men in general need women to need us, need our families to need us, and we need to be appreciated for the sacrifices we make and the work we do.

That is where the fragile and delicate aspect of women fits into the whole thing. However annoyed we might be at having to put down the remote control, men NEED to be asked to open the pickle jar, or do hard things that our women cannot do. That is where the meaning in our lives comes from. We just need our value to be acknowledged.

Without women being what you are, men won't bother to be what we are, and we won't aspire to being what we can be. That is what is happening with MGTOW.

So you think we:

Should stay at home like a french housewife?

Shouldn't do IB physics or maths at higher?

Shouldn't do Jiu Jitsu?

Shouldn't smile when a man makes a derogatory comment and say 'I could kick your ass twenty shades of purple before you put a finger on me'?

Hitting like a girl? You haven't met a female blackbelt.

"Women would be far more desirable if they acted like what they were, rather than trying to constantly compare with the male strength, agility, and intelligence."

Who cares about being desirable?

thats the best you got? using mythology?

Thats right, and now EVERYBODY has taken punishment. Talk about being hypnotized by a dick.

Definitely men are smarter and better, we are only kidding ourselves making out we are equal, we are not and never can be,

Okay, I'm a guy and I think that's a stupid assumption. It's an ENORMOUS generalization a and I'd say the same if a women said the vice versa.

Were you ever in a math class where a woman got an A and a guy got an F? Happened at some point right. How about the other way around.

There's also no logic behind your statement.

A) Men have accomplishments… so do women. The fact that men have accomplishments does not make them superior.

B) Thomas Edison actually did not make the lightbulb. He simply perfected and then patented technology that others created. Nikola Tesla should actually get a lot more credit than Edison does. But again, that doesn't make men superior than women. Most of the reasons these accomplishments were primarily done by men were because men forced women to stay removed from sciences and politics. The fact that men have accomplishments proves nothing.

there are female world leaders... India, Iceland, and many other countries have female leaders..

You should change your user to rookieDbater...

You should of been more alert than to snobbishly accuse that there is no female world leaders. I can agree to the fact that men are more superior than women but, I dislike your case completely. A very bad assumption on your part.

That's a second grade story. You realize that right? You realize that this is a stupid argument?