CreateDebate


Debate Info

17
15
Interesting But Mein Frankfurter
Debate Score:32
Arguments:34
Total Votes:37
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Interesting (13)
 
 But Mein Frankfurter (14)

Debate Creator

BurritoLunch(6466) pic



Must-See New Video Shows Capitol Riot Was Way Worse Than We Thought

Interesting

Side Score: 17
VS.

But Mein Frankfurter

Side Score: 15
1 point

the violence of the militant minority was not "way worse" than we thought. this was both announced by militias and predicted by extremist monitors well in advance, and the extent of the violence should not come as a surprise to anyone who's been paying attention.

Side: Interesting
BurritoLunch(6466) Clarified
2 points

the violence of the militant minority was not "way worse" than we thought. this was both announced by militias and predicted by extremist monitors well in advance, and the extent of the violence should not come as a surprise to anyone who's been paying attention.

Would you like a trumpet so you can better sing your own fanfare?

Side: Interesting
0 points
Crenshaw calls rabble rousers cowards
Side: Interesting
Jody(1486) Disputed
1 point

Seeing as you ran and deleted the other debate .....

You think Trump said something illegal, but you are not able to post what it was he said.

Don’t fret Twitter have all the evidence needed I know you respect these “patriots” as your “valiant “ defence of Trump clearly demonstrates

You want me to do your digging. I won't.

I’ve done mine so you don’t have to .Well dont

If you're going to argue about a law, you'll want the legal code to define it, not a dictionary definition.

I won’t actually as those in legal circles in the US I’m sure know what they mean when they claim sedition is one of the many charges Trump could face

I already provided you the legal code smart guy. Is there a reason you don't want to use it? It probably didn't occur to you.

I couldn’t give a fuck what you provided as it’s irrelevant unless of course your part paid Trumps legal team

As for the YouTube video, I pay attention to Crenshaw. I searched him and got that clip.

That’s the long John silver guy wheres his parrot 🦜 day off?

I literally don't watch news programs, so I don't pay to have their apps on my streaming service.

I wouldn’t believe a word out of your mouth it’s rather telling you’ve gone from FOX (which you never watch) to the dizzy heights of ......You Tube 🤔

Incidentally what’s that “bullshit” you said Trump was spouting during the riot ? You know the stuff I asked you 11 times about that your goldfish memory cannot remember ?

Side: But Mein Frankfurter
Amarel(5285) Disputed
2 points

That was Noms debate simple one.

I know you're not one for nuance, but this might be a good beginner lesson. Saying that something is not against the law is not the same as saying it's a good right thing.

I won’t actually as those in legal circles in the US I’m sure know what they mean when they claim sedition is one of the many charges Trump could face

Wow. I forgot that your appeals to authority don't always have a specific authority. Just so long as you think they are smarter than you. That must be why you like broad appeals to no specific authority. Kind of like crimes about words that include no specific words.

I couldn’t give a fuck what you provided as it’s irrelevant unless of course your part paid Trumps legal team

It would be relevant to prosecutors too. It's actually the only relevant definition.

That’s the long John silver guy wheres his parrot 🦜 day off?

No, that's Dan Crenshaw.

Incidentally what’s that “bullshit” you said Trump was spouting during the riot ? You know the stuff I asked you 11 times about that your goldfish memory cannot remember ?

Lol! Still hoping I'll post the words necessary to make your argument for you! Lazy little bitch. His rhetoric was typically bad Trump rhetoric. That doesnt make it illegal. And the fact that's it's legal doesn't make it good or ok. Simple stuff here Jo. Post any given Trump quote and I'll tell you why it's not in breach of the law in question.

Side: Interesting
-1 points

It's worse because of hypotheticals?

"Just think what could have happened to the man"

"The could have possibly taken hostages, and might have wanted to harm people"

These are mind-reading charges. Kangaroo court.

Side: Interesting
BurritoLunch(6466) Clarified
3 points

These are mind-reading charges. Kangaroo court.

Perhaps you'd like to explain to the kangaroo court how thousands of people managed to read the exact same message from Trump's mind.

Side: Interesting
Nomoturtle(780) Clarified Banned
0 points

Mass paranoia from people that have been instigated by msm, coupled with a growing feedback loop of a caricature of reality. It's the same way competing ideas among groups build enemies of each other with strawmans, both losing root from the original argument or event. See CGP Grey's video on this subject .

We're now at the point where "go home in peace and love" is apparently part of a call to violence, being a censorable and bannable offense.

Side: Interesting
Amarel(5285) Disputed
1 point

It's worse because there were rioters fighting really hard against police and police shooting people. Before it was white cops going easy on white supremacists.

Side: But Mein Frankfurter
Nomoturtle(780) Clarified Banned
1 point

there were rioters fighting really hard against police and police shooting people.

Yeah, there were.

Before it was white cops going easy on white supremacists.

Come again?

Side: Interesting
No arguments found. Add one!