CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:122
Arguments:120
Total Votes:137
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Negro Democrat refuses to resign after "I Hope Trump Is Assassinated" post (102)

Debate Creator

outlaw60(15368) pic



Negro Democrat refuses to resign after "I Hope Trump Is Assassinated" post

On Thursday, Missouri state Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal (D) posted the following comment in a Facebook thread: “I hope Trump is assassinated!” Shortly after the Facebook post, the Secret Service noted they were “looking into” the remark. Additionally, politicians from both parties are not only condemning Chappelle-Nadal, but asking that she resign.
Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) released an official statement on Thursday, which reads: “I condemn it. It's outrageous. And she should resign.” Rep. William Lacy Clay echoed McCaskill: “[Calling] for the assassination of the President is a federal crime.” He added that Chappelle-Nadal is “an embarrassment to our state" and "she should resign immediately.”

Although she admitted to The Kansas City Star that her assassination comment “was wrong,” she claims she didn't mean it, and that she is simply “frustrated” because President Trump is “causing hate.”

Despite her controversial remark, Chappelle-Nadal says she will not resign.

The Party of Hate strikes again with a Negro at the lead !!!!!

Add New Argument

What's funny about it is that she, a liberal, can make remarks that she didn't have a lot of time to think out, and she should quickly be forgiven, but if Trump doesn't say everything exactly the way they want it said and when they want it said, they crucify him, and he isn't even threatening to kill anyone.

Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

Except, she wasn't quickly forgiven: “[Calling] for the assassination of the President is a federal crime.” He added that Chappelle-Nadal is “an embarrassment to our state" and "she should resign immediately.” and "I condemn it. It's outrageous. And she should resign.”

And, she didn't threaten to kill Trump.

Why can't you be against Democrats without giving your ideas of how the world works? That would be so much better. Every time you mention how you think the world works we see how much of a fraud you are and it damages your message and strengthens whatever message you attack.

For instance, look at excon. When he said he is a peace loving liberal then he says to punch people in the face he loses all his credibility.

2 points

Why can't you be against Democrats without giving your ideas of how the world works? That would be so much better

That makes about as much sense as crotchless underwear. Essentially, oppose the Democrats but never say why like an idiot with no opinion. In other words you'd feel better if I took no position and was a beta male like yourself. No thanks. I'm good.

2 points

Except, she wasn't quickly forgiven

No crap. And Trump is never forgiven for any word that comes out of his mouth and many times for words that never came out of his mouth or words he didn't say. Imagine if Trump had said he wanted Obama assassinated. All hell would break loose and then some.

2 points

Every time you mention how you think the world works we see how much of a fraud you are and it damages your message and strengthens whatever message you attack

I'm not here looking for converts.

2 points

For instance, look at excon. When he said he is a peace loving liberal then he says to punch people in the face he loses all his credibility

Or it's like when you go on cursing fits like a 10 year old child when the debate doesn't go your way or someone disagrees with you. You lose all credibility. I can at least respect Excon for taking hard stances and defending a position. There's no one that knows what you stand for because you don't stand for anything.

excon(18260) Disputed
1 point

Hello:

Dude!! I've NEVER said I was a "peace loving liberal".. I'm a LIBERAL, but peace loving is NOT in my nature.. I am NOT a nice fellow. I NEVER said I was..

Can you read WORDS????????? Do you know that WORDS matter???????

No, you don't...

excon

outlaw60(15368) Clarified
-1 points

Did the Negro Democrat make the claim or not ? She does not deny she did so it must be okay for the Leftist to threaten the POTUS is that right ?

2 points

Liberals keep showing us they are the intolerant ones.

They don't like Trump's policies so they show us all what complete intolerant hypocrites they are.

A few Democrats spoke out against her. Where was the outcry that should have occured?

Remember the Liberal Professor who is so filled with hate he painted a depiction of Trump's severed head. The intolernt Leftwing hypocrites allowed this hate painting to be displayed on the walls of a Pubicly funded College for impressionable students to see.

Do you like paying a fortune to send your children to College just so they can be indoctrinated to the Left's ideology.

What kind of person even would think of creating such a painting? An intolernt hateful person.... that's who. That hateful Professor should have been told to resign if he tried to put that on College walls.

There was no outcry from the Left to take that painting down, but they are ok with taking down things that bother them.

They scream, tear down those religious symbols on public land!!!!!!

They say censor the pledge of Alegience, it mentions God!

marcusmoon(576) Clarified
1 point

FW,

What kind of person even would think of creating such a painting? An intolernt hateful person....

Your conclusion does not necessarily follow. True, some art is intended as a sort of symbolic wish fulfillment, but some of it is metaphoric commentary. All of it is open to interpretation, and the artist's interpretation does not predominate.

Consider how many paintings there are of crucifixion. They do not necessarily imply a desire to crucify anyone, nor that the artists were intolerant and hateful.

Consider that every Christian church displays the cross, which the Romans used to torture insurgents to death, which presided over the Inquisition, the torture of Roman Catholics in England under Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, the enslavement and genocide of Native Americans, etc. Displaying a cross in no way implies approval of oppression, torture, slavery or genocide.

Images of a beheaded Trump are likewise open to various interpretations.

For example, Kathy Griffin's image of holding a bloody Trump head is easily and reasonably interpreted as a comment that the Left's dishonest treatment of Trump and his statements (in an attempt to remove him from power) is as evil, reactionary, and irrational as ISIS who literally behead their more similarly more rational opposition. Griffin's intent is irrelevant.

This mutability of art's meaning is similarly used by the left to assert that all statues of Civil War personages and the Confederate flag are automatically racist.

The way to fight it is to acknowledge that the meaning of art is subject to the individual viewing the art, and then to articulate clearly alternate interpretations.

FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

Historical monuments are in no way comparible to today's art. Those statues represent real people who fought real wars.

If today's artists wanted to paint a rosier picture of their meaning of Trump's severed head, they had ample time to do so.

A painting of a crucifixtion of an unknown person has no hateful intent. It is merely speaking to how people were sometimes kill in the past.

When you put Trump on that cross, you have crossed over to hate art, UNLESS, you explain your intent for the painting. Why would a decent kind compassionate Artist leave it up to the viewer to jump to the wrong conclusion represented by such a barbaric painting?

It's about sensationalism, money, fame, notaritity, etc.

If the Artist does not want the wrong impression, he should clarify so as not to influence some nut job to assasinate the President.

Cartman(18192) Disputed
0 points

Liberals keep showing us they are the intolerant ones.

They don't like Trump's policies so they show us all what complete intolerant hypocrites they are.

Excellent start to your argument. You start with a premise that is very easy to demonstrate. So, now all you have to do is talk about how ridiculous it is to hope for the president to be assassinated. Did you do that? Nope. Why would you do that?

A few Democrats spoke out against her. Where was the outcry that should have occured?

That's fucking stupid. You never give a single fuck about the bullshit Republicans pull. That's just stupid. Don't bring up what the democrats did right. That's fucking stupid.

Remember the Liberal Professor who is so filled with hate he painted a depiction of Trump's severed head. The intolernt Leftwing hypocrites allowed this hate painting to be displayed on the walls of a Pubicly funded College for impressionable students to see.

What the fuck are you doing? You haven't even discussed how awful it is to hope for an assassination. Don't go to a stupid painting. Someone is hoping the president dies. Get your priorities straight.

Do you like paying a fortune to send your children to College just so they can be indoctrinated to the Left's ideology.

The Democrats are electing these garbage individuals and you are not talking about it.

What kind of person even would think of creating such a painting? An intolernt hateful person.... that's who. That hateful Professor should have been told to resign if he tried to put that on College walls.

What kind of intolerant person hopes for the assassination of the president. Talk about that you fucking moron.

There was no outcry from the Left to take that painting down, but they are ok with taking down things that bother them.

There is no outcry from you about a Democrat hoping for an assassination. What's wrong with you?

So, because you are such a shitty debater you didn't even mention how awful it is to hope for an assassination attempt. Good job.

1 point

That's fucking stupid. You never give a single fuck about the bullshit Republicans pull. That's just stupid. Don't bring up what the democrats did right. That's fucking stupid

I told you that you become a mental midget with terets when you aren't getting your way or hearing exactly what you want to hear. It's pretty sad to watch your juvenile meltdowns. Maybe we can hire a mature teenager to make your posts for you.

1 point

how awful it is to hope for an assassination attempt. Good job.

I had to splash my face with water when your post started making sense. That teenager we sent to post for you must have showed up.

1 point

Hello poochy boy:

Here's a news headline for you:

Orange man REFUSES to resign after he called Nazis and white supremacists FINE PEOPLE...

Now get this bone.

excon

outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

Pay attention STUPID what the Democrat did is a Federal Crime !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

According to the FRAUD Trump needs to resign but where were all the Democrat voters when the Election Process was under way ? They failed to show up and vote ?

marcusmoon(576) Disputed
1 point

after he called Nazis and white supremacists FINE PEOPLE...

I do not see how he said that. He said that there were "fine people on both sides" when talking about the gathering that turned violent in Charlottesville, AFTER he asserted that there is no place for violence OR BIGOTRY in our nation.

In the context of all his remarks, including the clear and unequivocal denunciation of both bigotry and violence I understood what he was saying to mean that he understood that many people who showed up did so to take part in peaceful public discourse with the good of the society at heart.

1-Some of those people in Charlottesville were behaving peacefully, and saying they wanted the statue to remain for various NON-racist reasons. (Preserve history for example) These are arguably fine people.

2-Some of those people in Charlottesville were behaving peacefully, and saying they wanted the statue to be removed, or that they disagree with White Supremacist ideology, or both. These are arguably fine people.

I am concerned about the eagerness to assume that people who have SOME ends in common with assholes must also be assholes, and that they must agree with the assholes about EVERYTHING.

-It is possible for a fine person to be within a block of members of the KKK and ANTIFA without approving or supporting either group.

-It is possible for a fine person and a KKK asshole to agree that our history ought to be preserved and publicly displayed in parks, without agreeing about anything else.

-It is possible for a fine person and an anti-free speech ANTIFA dickhead to agree that racism is bad, without agreeing about anything else.

I know it is trendy to try to find ways to give condemnable interpretations to statements that become vague when taken out of context, but it is hardly in line with responsible behavior and fair discussion.

It is misleading and irresponsible to ignore Trump's clear condemnation of bigotry.

Quantumhead(749) Disputed
1 point

I do not see how he said that. He said that there were "fine people on both sides" when talking about the gathering that turned violent in Charlottesville, AFTER he asserted that there is no place for violence OR BIGOTRY in our nation.

Saying there are fine people on both sides is a false equivalence when one of the sides consists of neo-Nazis and white supremacists. In fact it sounds exactly like something Hitler would say. Being neutral is a zero sum condition with no place in a world which has already experienced where Nazism leads.

including the clear and unequivocal denunciation of both bigotry and violence

Oh come on. He's being a politician for fuck's sake. He denounces bigotry when it suits him, and when it doesn't he tries to ban Muslim immigration.

1 point

According to your misrepresentation, he also called ANTIFA "fine people", so go fetch this twisted "lib stck".

1 point

She isn't in a leadership position in the Democrat party and she is also universally condemned by them. So... In what way is she leading them?

1 point

I don't see them calling for her resignation. They've called for Trump's for theoretically doing less.

Obviously, a prerequisite for someone of her position is lack of judgment; why else is she still there?

1 point

what is the point of mentioning her race? if she was white would her behavior be less of a problem?

Silly negros, they say the darndest things.

-----------------------------------------------

0 points

She is a source of the hate and the Negro is morally bankrupt.