CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
8
Stupid then Stuoid now
Debate Score:13
Arguments:14
Total Votes:14
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Stupid then (4)
 
 Stuoid now (3)

Debate Creator

CrapWeasel(529) pic



Nom acting like a doofus 5 years ago as Micmacmoc

Stupid then

Side Score: 5
VS.

Stuoid now

Side Score: 8
1 point

Out of you, FM and Nom it is most likely that Nom was MicMacMoc but I have strong belief that Micmacmoc was Hellno.

Side: Stupid then
Amarel(4984) Clarified
1 point

I’m still never certain that Nom isn’t actually FM. Though they act differently, there are also substantial similarities. Nom has less to him and many of his responses are along the same simple lines. He could easily be a fiction of FM’s

Side: Stupid then
5 points

Every time I tell fm he's nom, he goes silent.

Side: Stuoid now
Jody(1349) Disputed
1 point

I’m still never certain that Nom isn’t actually FM

I think you’re spot on. The game was given away when F M talked about resource based economics and Jacques Fresco and came up with the very same nonsense as Nom

Side: Stuoid now

There is a lot of alt abuse on this site and it has created a sort of alt account paranoia that's got everyone thinking that everyone else is someone's alt.

Side: Stuoid now
Amarel(4984) Clarified
1 point

In your debate against me you spelled behavior like a European. Oops.

Side: Stupid then
ArchonElite(336) Disputed
1 point

In your debate against me you spelled behavior like a European. Oops.

Yeah I like to use UK spelling but I don't always do it. If I was trying to hide something why would I openly do it? If I am Nom I am obviously capable of faking it consistently so what would be the point of me not doing so? The truth is you are retarded, you just typed an entire wall of text containing no proof of free will then accused me of ignoring the proof you provided and now you are over-analysing how I spell words like a deranged internet stalker.

Side: Stupid then