Active discrimination against queen gays is used by non-queen gays in internet arguments about homophobia, as a means for the majority to dismiss the queens as faggots that should be hated. It'd be understandable that a non-queen gay would dislike the loud and flamboyent queens making society place them under a label, but it's not right to dismiss them as 'the bad ones where all the hate should be directed at because they're just more disgusting in the way they act'.

Because it is a part of their intrinsic nature to be flamboyant and glamorous. (It's who they are.)  

There are patterns in how queens act; they're usually quite expressive, superficial, loud, attention seeking and drawn to material things and bright colors, reflecting heavily on their preference for sensory experiences over intellectual endeavors. Due to their preference for the 5 senses over intuition and introspection, they exert a flamboyant nature as they sieze the present moment, holding nothing back. These qualities represent a person with a keen eye for fashion, appreciation of aesthetics, courage of expression and an attentiveness to the 5 senses, something that society would not fair well without. The fact that these qualities could exist in a male body, shouldn't prompt anyone to lash out violently to them, physically or verbally, because they really haven't done anything except exist as an epitome of a great portion of the fabulousness in the universe.

These characteristics may clash with and annoy a majority of internet-dwellers for the population of internet-dwellers is mostly comprised of intuitive, introspective people including me, (the usual participants in internet arguments about homophobia) - and these are the ones who are often disgusted by their flamboyancy. Those disgusted by homophobia also include non-queen-gays as their intuitive and introspective qualities stamp out any material desires and flamboyancy.