Nostradamus Predictions are Legitimate and On Point
For the Motion
Side Score: 13
|
Against the Motion
Side Score: 22
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
2
points
Nostradamus was way too vague to be taken seriously, also he was a "prophet" so that should raise a red flag in and of itself. When I was younger I was obsessed with the metaphysical and even at that time I didn't take him seriously, and I used to think it was possible to shapeshift and do sith lightning in real life. When some 12 year old believes they are going to grow up to be a shaman/wizard and even they don't take your prophesies seriously you know you've got issues. Side: Against the Motion
@FactMachine. Lol. I agree. I know that there are some relevant percentage of people who do take Nostradamus's Prophecies seriously however and it is promoted on the History Channel as though he were as legitimate an intellectual figure in History as Newton Side: Against the Motion
1
point
Bible prophecy, on the other hand, contains names, dates and specific events. Yeah, specific events like Moses parting the waves, Jesus turning water into wine, God speaking through a burning bush etc... These events provide solid evidence that the Bible is a complete crock of shit, because all of them contradict the laws of physics. Side: For the Motion
1
point
|