Now about the morality of a bag of more evolved pond scum taking an AR-15 to lesser....
|
This just proves that you're sick in the head. You actually think that scientists, atheists, educated sociologists and psychologists -- people who are against gun-violence and against giving guns to mentally unstable people -- believe that the kids who died in this tragedy are just "less evolved pond scum". It says a fucking helluva lot about the state of your moral compass. These are the people who want to stop this violence from ever being able to take place. And your response to such a tragedy is to insinuate that these people see these kids as nothing more than "pond scum", such is your ignorance and depravity. These kids are innocents, and these people are trying to stop this from ever happening again. And sickos like you are making it impossible because you twist things so grotesquely and mindlessly. Your hatred for the human race is staggering, as is your stupidity. YOU are pond scum. These kids are amazing creatures with more integrity and compassion that you can even comprehend. They are a credit to a country that is hanging by a noose on account of morons like you. 1
point
I would never attribute logical consistency to atheists. But tell us why they are not simply lesser evolved pond scum? You atheist morons think all living things are just greater or lesser evolved pond scum, right? And what makes one creature more evolved or less evolved is natural selection or survival of the fittest, right? Who is more fit? The shooter or the dead kid? Thus, the shooter is more evolved pond scum and the dead kid lesser evolved pond scum, right? So, what is wrong with the more evolved pond scum killing the lesser evolved pond scum? Save your worthless opinions and answer the Q. I do love the irony of this fool thinking his own worldview is "grotesque, mindless, hateful and stupid". On that we agree. 2
points
1
point
2
points
My sad and unfortunate sufferer of cerebral polymorphism. The reason you are completely and wholeheartedly wrong is this. Darwinistic natural selection is something that takes place when the members of the selected population is reliant on external forces, not intellectual aphorisms, for its selection processes. Meaning, in modern human society, natural selection is all but abolished, unless your too stupid and swallow a washcloth or something, but all in all, all of Darwinian natural selection is artificially bypassed by doctors and laws that make it illegal to kill stupid people. You constantly try and argue that all athiests think that natural selection is the only way to progress, but you display your fatuous ignorance because everyone knows that Darwinian evolution is over in human populations. Now it’s time for some artificial, metaphysically manifested change, but I know you won’t get it. Ban away, fruitsac. |
