CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
18
The US should nuke North K The US should not nuke North K
Debate Score:20
Arguments:13
Total Votes:24
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The US should nuke North K (2)
 
 The US should not nuke North K (7)

Debate Creator

Milletary(17) pic



Nuking North Korea

The US should nuke North K

Side Score: 2
VS.

The US should not nuke North K

Side Score: 18
0 points

From that point on, N.K. will stand for Nuclear Korea.

Really though, I think if North Korea actually went ahead and nuked anyone, the rest of the world would look straight at them and say, "You done goofed", and all nations would unite against the regime of North Korea.

No, let North Korea threaten and posture all it wants. That is a very American way of communicating. In fact, Korean policy has historically been "Juche", which usually gets translated as "self reliance". North Korea has adopted this policy. They want to be left alone, so their foreign policy is basically the middle finger raised up high into the air.

I say leave them alone until they really screw up. When that moment comes, be patient for the reaction and then gauge the situation from there. Cross that bridge when you get there.

For now, I think they are demonstrating their American recognized right to practice their religion, bear arms, have their privacy, and be LEFT ALONE.

I'm not scared of North Korea, and no one else should be scared either. Let them throw the first punch. Sticks and stones break bones, but words aren't going to hurt. They might be throwing stones, but they aren't aiming at anyone. They are shooting at the air and yelling, "Git offa meh prop-o-tay!"

Really, if the people of North Korea are so sick of what is going on, they should rebel or something. There could already be a rebellion going on under the scenes for all we know.

I'm not scared of North Korea. Let them do their thing I say. Maybe just leave them alone.

Side: The US should nuke North K
yehbby33221(8) Clarified
1 point

If North Korea wants to be a dictatorship,cool let them, let the UN impose sanctions that probably won't make much of a difference but don't irk them and make them want war, just leave them alone.

Side: The US should nuke North K
5 points

Why nuke North Korea ? Great plan isn't it wipe out all the innocent men , women and children who have suffered under this fat little fuck ; the little bastard is full of wind and piss and will never attack anyone as he knows that's his comfortable little racket goes down the drain if he does .

Side: The US should not nuke North K
3 points

You are correct to consider the lives of innocent and how the use of nuclear bombs indiscriminately punishes them.

Side: The US should not nuke North K
2 points

Normally the P R people are called in at that stage to use horrible terms like " collateral damage " , sounds so much nicer than mass annihilation doesn't it ?

Side: The US should not nuke North K
2 points

We're afraid that they might use their nuclear weapons on our allies so let's nuke them and thereby ensure that they use their nuclear weapons on our allies.

Side: The US should not nuke North K
1 point

It's collective madness isn't it ?..........................

Side: The US should not nuke North K
3 points

The US should target military bases and bomb the living daylights out of them without using nukes and they should assassinate Kim's fat ass right now.

Side: The US should not nuke North K
0 points

That's about right. Although if N Korea succeeded in nuking a US city there would be eye for an eye.

Side: The US should not nuke North K
Athene(41) Clarified
0 points

If the current regime in the DPRK launches any nuclear ordinance at a state aligned with the US or the US itself, Pyongyang will become a smoking crater in the ground, and all 2.581 million of its starving and ideologically blinded citizens with it.

Side: The US should nuke North K
0 points

Yeah. Problem is you got your asses kicked last time you took them on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War

Side: The US should nuke North K