Obama should be kicked out of office. (as in not a 2nd term)
Keep this in mind he is allowing a terrorist group known as the Muslim Brotherhood to infultrate our goverment. They are trying to start what they call "civilization- jihad". Which stands for or is something close to "holy war". What they do in a holy war is basically this if you don't follow their beliefs than they kill you no matter if you are a man, women, or child.
Now lots of people are going to say "I have a 1stamendment right to exercise my beleifs.", but thats 1 of the things they are trying to do away with so
- you can't beleive what you want,
- can't say what you want,
- they can completly control the press,
- keep you from petitioning the goverment,
- and so they can keep you from assembling together and revolting.
they are trying to repeal the 2nd amendment so you can't fight back as easily.
Yes
Side Score: 12
|
 |
No
Side Score: 14
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
Cuaroc is right. Romney isnt that guy. If anything Obama is going to be president. The indpendent party members are MIA. While Obama is just winning right now. Sorry but we will face the 2nd wave of Obama. Just suck it up and get ready to spit it out after his second term is over Side: No
1
point
Keep this in mind he is allowing a terrorist group known as the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate our government. They are trying to start what they call "civilization- jihad". Which stands for or is something close to "holy war". What they do in a holy war is basically this if you don't follow their beliefs than they kill you no matter if you are a man, women, or child. Now lots of people are going to say "I have a 1st amendment right to exercise my beliefs.", but that is 1 of the things they are trying to do away with so you can't believe what you want, can't say what you want, they can completely control the press, keep you from petitioning the government, and so they can keep you from assembling together and revolting. they are trying to repeal the 2nd amendment so you can't fight back as easily. Side: Yes
|
2
points
I'm not sure if the intended meaning of this question is if Obama should be "kicked out" by means of impeachment or by the lack of a second term, but I'll just assume it's the latter. If the only alternative to Obama is a guy who makes claims like "corporations are people too", my answer is absolutely not. Side: No
1
point
I would have to respectfully say no. This is a man that has come into a situation where we were bleed over 700,000 jobs a month and he has stopped the bleeding. Even though his health care plan isn't as far as I would have liked it to go, he has passed health care were you can not be turned away for a preexisting condition and you can stay on your parents insurance until you're 26. He passed the equal pay for women, and took the banks out of student loans. He has brought the auto industry back, held BP accountable for the oil spill and made them shell out 10 billion dollars to people directly affected, whilst the republicans apologized to the BP President and called it a shake down. He presented congress with the "Jobs Act Bill" that would have put millions of people to work through infrastructure which would have included fixing our crumbling bridges, but congress blocked it amongst other legislation that Obama has presented to them making him the most "filibustered" president in United States history. So if he can get this much done when you got people on the inside trying to make him a one term president at the expense of the country, then I'll take my chances when we vote the high jacked party out of congress, so he can make some real progress. Side: No
"He passed the equal pay for women" First, i can tell you are probably a woman from this, and second, I bet you didn't know that it has illegal for employers to discriminate workers based on age, race, sex, etc already and it hasn't changed much. "He has brought the auto industry back" this one is simple, he didn't buy the whole industry back, he only opened the plants that donated money to the election, and the part he did get back he paid a few billion, a few billion we don't have. Side: Yes
2
points
The reason he passed that "Lilly Ledbetter" act was because Mrs. Ledbetter tried to sue her employers for pay discrimination but the court ruled against her because of statutory limits, this law amends the law you're talking about which now says the discrimination starts after each pay checked received during the discrimination. He saved the auto industries that were about to go bankrupt and they have all paid the government back the money that was lent, and if what you say is true why didn't Romney say anything about it, all he said was he would have done the same thing as Obama and actually tried to take credit for it. And I am a man not a woman lets keep it classy and not make assumptions, because someone believes in equality. Side: Yes
1
point
|
