Our opinions are facts.
Our opinions are facts, but those facts are not necessarily valid or invalid inferences.
(This is for all of you who love to use the term 'fact' as a validation of an argument without proving the truth or falsity of the fact of inference.)
Yes
Side Score: 10
|
No
Side Score: 14
|
|
|
|
1
point
|
2
points
1
point
1
point
The problem I have with that response is that some things are facts within yourself. These facts can be proven to a certain extent, whether it be from prior knowledge or something that you think. For example: McDonalds is disgusting. "Prove it to be a fact" Prove it to not be a fact. Side: yes but not in a debate
Aparently you didn't get my irony. Here's some more for you. The basis of your argument does not make sence. What it all boils down to is this. Facts are real, reality is physical, physical is matter, matter is energy, energy is fact. Thoughts are conjurations, conjurations are not physical, conjurations are not real. - Disambigulation • McDonalds (physical) is disgusting (non-physical) >•Physical is Non-Physical >>• f(x)=x, when x' is inequal to x" >>• SINTAX Side: yes
0
points
1
point
|