(PROOF) Gay marriage is wrong
Gays (anal-lovers) are sinners.
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones.
"PROOF" that ALL sex is wrong:
10 The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” 11 But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given. 12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.”
I never will understand christians like you. Jesus (who you call your god, by the way... don't forget that) preached to love thy neighbor. He didn't include any ifs, ands, or buts to that statement. He literally made friends with sinners, like Mary Magdalene, and went against the established religious leaders. And then modern radical christians take his messages and completely go against them. Y'all should be ashamed.
"Anal-lovers are sinners" although I burst out laughing as this is the first time I heard this, I must say that I have engaged in anal sex (as the penetrator) with a few of my female 'beneficial' friends. I suppose God will smite me for fornicating (maybe, remember it was anal penetration not vaginal), but will he smite me for, as I pondered, 'anal' penetration?
But.... Then again I must not even lust. So I guess in order for me to function properly to engage in anal sex (I.e. Maintain a boner) I suppose my natural bioneurological reactions giving rise to [a boner] would entail lust.... But does it? Let's assume I have a sexual dysfunction opposite to that of erectile dysfunction (though arbitrary erections could be considered a dysfunction) and I simply just engage in penetration for reasons unknown (though not lustful), would that then, be sinful? (Note: No lust, or biblical definition of 'sex'.)
Hah, yet you cannot respond to my statements regarding your contradictory claims and blatant false statements.....
But you sure can attempt to recieve up-votes by pointing out something that is entirely impossible to you, which therefore makes it impossible for others as well? Lol you're a joke kid; Please stop responding to my arguments since you're clearly soneone who is academically incompetent and wishes to only make others laugh or point out something as being false- even when you know you cannot prove it to be. I'm sure this site has a place for you somewhere but not where intellect is a requisite for substantive debating.