CreateDebate


Debate Info

57
47
Yup Yup
Debate Score:104
Arguments:6
Total Votes:131
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yup (3)

Debate Creator

The_Kurgen(62) pic



Please Note That Wikipedia Has Confirmed The Republicans Are Terrorists

Yup

Side Score: 57
VS.

Yup

Side Score: 47
No arguments found. Add one!

But wkipedia says wikipedia isn't a reliable source though. And the Muslims is far right though too.

Side: Yup
Ebony12 Disputed
3 points

But wkipedia says wikipedia isn't a reliable source though

But it doesn't though. You're distorting what Wikipedia says because you're a lying terrorist.

Side: Yup
2 points

lying terrorist

Prove it. Prove it, or you're a liar.

Side: Yup
1 point

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything, and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.

However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not a reliable source.[1][2][3]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

Side: Yup

Republicans =/= the alt-right. Not all Republicans are people with alt-right beliefs. And, Wikipedia never confirmed Republicans as terrorists. It simply said that SPLC identified some attackers as alt-right, even though some aren't. If you knew anything about the Southern Povert Law Center, you would feel bad for citing them.

Side: Yup
1 point

The words from your own mouth confirm that you are a clueless troll. But then, liberals will say or do anything to get their own way.

Side: Yup