CreateDebate


Debate Info

18
12
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:30
Arguments:29
Total Votes:30
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (16)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (11)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(37631) pic



Political correctness dictate that we should stop calling people mother f***er

We should refer to them as, "fathers"
Keep in mind that:
1. Mothers love to get f***ed
2. If it weren't for a mother f***er you wouldn't be here today

True.

Side Score: 18
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 12

If you disagree with me, then you're a father ;)

Side: True.
SunTzuv2(93) Clarified
1 point

Yes, daddy. (◠‿◠✿)

Side: True.

I'm not your daddy ;)

Side: True.
1 point

Luke, I disagree with you.

Side: True.

I knew it ;)

Side: True.

Fuck political correctness. I will not be told what to do.....................................................................................

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

I'm partial to father f'er, for the alliteration.

Just fyi, too: if you're being truly PC about it you wouldn't call a 'mother f'er' a 'father' either because that presumes the gender of the 'f'er'.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

We could use the gender neutral, "Baby maker" ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
Jace(4757) Disputed
1 point

-clutches at pearls- No! That implies a single party when there are clearly two. The power differential at play in designating a single maker of babies. The audacity, joe, the audacity!

Side: True.
Jace(4757) Disputed
1 point

It occurs to me that not all people who shag mums are making babies. The mum could be a mum independent of the shagger in question. Very monogamous assumption otherwise... very no go.

Side: True.