CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Pray the gay away!
Do you believe these camps have ever truly converted someone from gay to straight?
Do you think it's possible to convert?
Most "ex-gays" admit to the fact that they never really stopped having the gay urges, but that they've learned to "suppress" them (just like you suppress an urge to sin) and lead a straight life. Is that "conversion"?
You can surpress your emotions, but you'll never really be happy. And potentially, one day, you'll figure out it's not worth it and leave your wife and kids for another man.
So you have to ask yourself, would you like to live that lie to the world and yourself?
If someone is religious, I can understand that wanting to be straight to satisfy your parents expectations. However, as a woman, I don't want to wake up one morning and have my husband of ten years tell me he is gay and is leaving me for another man. I'd rather have married someone sexually attracted to me.
You are who you are. My philosophy is that being gay is not a sin and that it is completely normal, just like being straight. I am a practicing Catholic, so I should follow everything the Pope says, right? Wrong. I think it is impossible to "convert" to a different orientation and I think it is perfectly acceptable to be gay because why would God put some people on this Earth, make them gay, and then feel it was a sin and deem it immoral. Being gay is a "sin" by some because man deemed it that way.
Being converted is impossible, but suppressing these gay urges is possible. Changing your sexual orientation is more impossible than changing your gender, skin color (not including getting tan/pale), and height (after puberty). :)
This is what Freud had to say to a mother that asked him to treat her son:
"I gather from your letter that your son is a homosexual. I am most impressed by the fact that you do not mention this term yourself in your information about him. May I question you why you avoid it? Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation; it cannot be classified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function, produced by a certain arrest of sexual development. Many highly respectable individuals of ancient and modern times have been homosexuals, several of the greatest men among them. (Plato, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc). It is a great injustice to persecute homosexuality as a crime –and a cruelty, too. If you do not believe me, read the books of Havelock Ellis. By asking me if I can help [your son], you mean, I suppose, if I can abolish homosexuality and make normal heterosexuality take its place. The answer is, in a general way we cannot promise to achieve it. In a certain number of cases we succeed in developing the blighted germs of heterosexual tendencies, which are present in every homosexual; in the majority of cases it is no more possible. It is a question of the quality and the age of the individual. The result of treatment cannot be predicted.
What analysis can do for your son runs in a different line. If he is unhappy, neurotic, torn by conflicts, inhibited in his social life, analysis may bring him harmony, peace of mind, full efficiency, whether he remains homosexual or gets changed."
The only "proof" these camps have on the success of "conversion" is the Masters and Johnson book called "Homosexuality in Perspective" in which they claimed to have converted 70% of the participants. That evidence has now come out to be fake. Read:
I still don't think that these camps are really operating in good faith. They may use people's Christan beliefs to sell their services, but they do so by twisting and manipulating those beliefs. So ultimately it's all about the money.
Those who really did it in good faith, soon realized what they were doing and are now spending their lives trying to stop it. Some of them have even issued apologies. Read:
The fact that some parents are forcing their teenage children to these places is tragic and verges on child abuse. Mainstream Christians and Churches should come forward and condemn these camps and their practices. This is religious oppression to say the least.
Imagine what the reaction would be if a clinic claimed that they can make all black people white. That black people are not in God's plan and that all black people should do all they can to rid themselves of this sin/curse. Imagine if people took themselves and their children to have their blackness bleached out so they can be white. Would we allow it? Hell no! But yet again, because these groups operate under the religious cloak, they manage to escape. We are now used to ignoring them because we kind of "expect" such lunacy to come from extremely religious people. These are not Christian groups though. These are bigoted groups that have found refuge under the Christian cloak. A bit like every other extreme religious organization really...
Finally, to end with humor, I couldn't put it better than Butters in South Park, so here it is:
"All right. All right that does it! [turns around and faces the crowd] I am sick and tired of everyone telling me I'm confused! I wasn't confused until other people started tellin' me I was! You know what I think? I think maybe you are the ones who are confused! I'm not gonna be confused anymore just because you say I should be! My name is Butters, I'm eight years old, I'm blood type O, and I'm bicurious! And even that's okay! Because if I'm bicurious, and I'm somehow made from God, then I think your GOD must be a little bicurious himself!
Suppressing the 'urge' to be gay is pretty much like suppressing the urge to be straight. It cannot be done unless you're a priest who cannot be either!!! If one speaks of homosexuality as a sin then I would guess they're not gay at all. Of course I'd have a hard time believing that they were anything else. If one goes to these 'camps' to rid themselves of the 'demons' which possess them I'd still have a difficult time believing they were anything else...but they think they're a vile sinner!
A person is what they are, nothing more and nothing less. If your desire is to be a priest then I can see that celibacy would come into play but that would interfere no matter what. So what's the big deal about praying gay away? You can pray all you wish to but that doesn't mean you can pray away the essence of your being. Yes, I think it's bullshit, clear and simple.
I'm sorry, but I find nothing on earth funnier than a bunch of Christians trying to convert gay people from... gayness I guess. I know it's serious, but it's just so goddamn funny.
Like, how many gay porn movies could that be the plot for?
I just love it.
Really, there's only one kind of Christian who really cares that much about "saving" a gay person, and that's a gay Christian, who incedently hates themselves for it... I mean, who wouldn't want to be a self-hating lunatic who worships invisible beings and injures his own cock nightly as he furiously masterbates to the latest jockey underwear ad then immediately feels guilty for it? Sounds like FUN! Where do I sign up?
I'm considering finding one of these gay conversion places here in LV, there has to be one, and finding a pretty little Christian chick to "cure" my gayness in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus H. Christ. I mean you can't reason with these people, might as well have fun with it.
Hey Alterion, that should be the next movie you make, I'll write the script if you're down.
This is one of the worst things about religion. People trying to force you to act against your very nature for no other reason then some obscure passage in a fucking book.
It has been undeniably proven that sexual preference is something that we are born with. It is not a choice.
I have no doubt that people can convince gullible homosexuals that what they are feeling is wrong...make them feel guilty for feelings that are completely natural. They may even be able to make them act straight. I can't imagine that this is good for someones mental health, however, and I am sure that these feelings that are being repressed will manifest themselves in a negative way later in life.
If you are straight, imagine being forced to have sex with someone of the same gender. Does that sound repulsive to you? Well now you might understand how homosexuals who are forced to go to these kind of camps feel.
There is nothing wrong with being gay, just like there is nothing wrong with being black, blue eyed, or female. It's not a choice, and the sooner people learn to accept those who are different, the sooner we can end nonsense like this.
"It has been undeniably proven that sexual preference is something that we are born with. It is not a choice."
WHAT? LOL, you just come up with your own "facts"? It has never been "undeniably proven". It's a theory; no more, no less. I personally believe most gay men are that way because daddy touched their naughty places when they were a kid.
Well perhaps you are unfamiliar with the biological evidence, of which there is ample. I will just concentrate here on the observed homosexuality in nature.
African Buffalo
African Elephant
Agile Wallaby
Amazon River Dolphin(Boto)
American Bison
Antelope
Asian Elephant
Asiatic Lion
Asiatic Mouflon
Atlantic Spotted Dolphin
Australian Sea Lion
Barasingha
Barbary Sheep
Beluga
Bharal
Bighorn Sheep
Black Bear
Blackbuck
Black-footed Rock Wallaby
Black-tailed Deer
Bonnet Macaque
Bonobo
Bottlenose Dolphin
Bowhead Whale
Brazilian Guinea Pig
Bridled Dolphin
Brown Bear
Brown Capuchin
Brown Long-eared Bat
Brown Rat
Buffalo
Caribou
Cat (domestic)
Cattle (domestic)
Cheetah
Collared Peccary
Commerson's Dolphin
Common Brushtail Possum
Common Chimpanzee
Common Dolphin
Common Marmoset
Common Pipistrelle
Common Raccoon
Common Tree Shrew
Cotton-top Tamarin
Crab-eating Macaque
Crested Black Macaque
Cui
Dall's Sheep
Daubenton's Bat
Dog (domestic)
Doria's Tree Kangaroo
Dugong
Dwarf Cavy
Dwarf Mongoose
Eastern Cottontail Rabbit
Eastern Grey Kangaroo
Elk
Euro (a subspecies of wallaroo)
European Bison
Fallow Deer
False Killer Whale
Fat-tailed Dunnart
Fin Whale
Fox
Gazelle
Gelada Baboon
Giraffe
Goat (Domestic)
Golden Monkey
Gorilla
Grant's Gazelle
Grey-headed Flying Fox
Grey Seal
Grey squirrel
Grey Whale
Grey Wolf
Grizzly Bear
Guinea Pig (Domestic)
Hamadryas Baboon
Hamster (Domestic)
Hanuman Langur
Harbor Porpoise
Harbor Seal
Himalayan Tahr
Hoary Marmot
Horse (domestic)
Human
Indian Fruit Bat
Indian Muntjac
Indian Rhinoceros
Japanese Macaque
Javelina
Kangaroo Rat
Killer Whale
Koala
Kob
Larga Seal
Least Chipmunk
Lechwe
Lesser Bushbaby
Lion
Lion-tailed Macaque
Lion Tamarin
Little Brown Bat
Livingstone's Fruit Bat
Long-eared Hedgehog
Long-footed Tree Shrew
Macaque
Markhor
Marten
Matschie's Tree Kangaroo
Moco
Mohol Galago
Moor Macaque
Moose
Mountain Goat
Mountain Tree Shrew
Mountain Zebra
Mouse (domestic)
Moustached Tamarin
Mule Deer
Musk-ox
Natterer's Bat
New Zealand Sea Lion
Nilgiri Langur
Noctule
North American Porcupine
Northern Elephant Seal
Northern Fur Seal
Northern Quoll
Olympic Marmot
Orangutan
Orca
Pacific Striped Dolphin
Patas Monkey
Pere David's Deer
Pig (Domestic)
Pig-tailed Macaque
Plains Zebra
Polar Bear
Pretty-faced Wallaby
Proboscis Monkey
Pronghorn
Przewalski's Horse
Puku
Quokka
Rabbit
Raccoon Dog
Red Deer
Red Fox
Red Kangaroo
Red-necked Wallaby
Red Squirrel
Reeves's Muntjac
Reindeer
Rhesus Macaque
Right Whale
Rock Cavy
Rodrigues Fruit Bat
Roe Deer
Rufous Bettong
Rufous-naped Tamarin
Rufous Rat Kangaroo
Saddle-back Tamarin
Savanna Baboon
Sea Otter
Serotine Bat
Sheep (Domestic)
Siamang
Sika Deer
Slender Tree Shrew
Sooty Mangabey
Sperm Whale
Spinifex Hopping Mouse
Spinner Dolphin
Spotted Hyena
Spotted Seal
Squirrel Monkey
Striped Dolphin
Stuart's Marsupial Mouse
Stumptail Macaque
Swamp Deer
Swamp Wallaby
Takhi
Talapoin
Tammar Wallaby
Tasmanian Devil
Tasmanian Rat Kangaroo
Thinhorn Sheep
Thomson's Gazelle
Tiger
Tonkean Macaque
Tucuxi
Urial
Vampire Bat
Verreaux's Sifaka
Vervet
Vicuna
Walrus
Wapiti
Warthog
Waterbuck
Water Buffalo
Weeper Capuchin
Western Grey Kangaroo
West Indian Manatee
Whiptail Wallaby
White-faced Capuchin
White-fronted Capuchin
White-handed Gibbon
White-lipped Peccary
White-tailed Deer
Wild Cavy
Wild Goat
Wisent
Yellow-footed Rock Wallaby
Yellow-toothed Cavy
That is a list of mammals in which homosexuality has been observed. In order for your theory to hold true, there must be a lot of animal child molestation going on. If you want further evidence I would be happy to provide. I would merely suggest that in the future you know something about the topic of which you are speaking before spewing the verbal diarrhea you called an argument.
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
My point is that your theory that homosexuality is caused by abuse doesn't hold up because of the numerous examples of homosexuality we see in the animal world. Clearly homosexuality must be biological otherwise why would it be so prevalent in nature?
MY point is, you can't compare humans to animals. Throwing feces is also prevalent in nature, as is eating it. It's in their biological make-up. But not in humans.
Just curious...do you believe that murderers are born that way? I mean, murder is so prevalent in nature......
Why not? There is nothing about humans that excludes them from the definition of animals.
Throwing feces is also prevalent in nature, as is eating it. It's in their biological make-up. But not in humans.
Do some research. You will find that the consumption of feces is not even close to as common in nature as homosexuality, and in fact has nothing to do with biological makeup. Good try though.
Just curious...do you believe that murderers are born that way? I mean, murder is so prevalent in nature......
Okay, so now you want to compare homosexuality to murder? Murder is bad because it infringes on the freedom of others (more specifically, their freedom to live). In what way does homosexuality hurt others?
Responding to your question though, there are some people who may be born with bad tempers or be more prone to violence, but certainly our genes are not our fate.
Back to the idea of homosexuality being biological though, you dismissed my first evidence that showed virtually every mammal (and actually most reptiles, birds, and fish) have significant percentages of their population that are homosexual. This however is not the main evidence supporting the claim that humans are biologically straight or homosexual.
Can we agree that sexual impulse towards the women is biological in straight men? Can we also agree that sexual impulse towards men is biological in women? Can we also agree that people who are straight do not make a conscious decision to be that way (as in, there was never a day when you decided to be straight, but you have instead always been attracted to women)?
I ask again though if you want the scientific studies that point to a biological influence in a persons homosexuality, because you seem to be making your arguments based on ignorance and unfounded assertions whereas I have actual science to back me up.
Regardless though, of whether homosexuality is a choice or not, why do you have a problem with it? Homosexuals do not hurt anyone, and in fact, if they are allowed to marry and adopt we would have significantly less children in foster care. In this way it would help society accept gays.
First off, I never stated I had a problem with homosexuals. My first wife was a homosexual/turned bi woman. Plenty of grade school friends of mine "came out of the closet" later on in life, and they are still my friends, etc. But anyway....
I don't think homosexuality is a CHOICE. I don't think someone wakes up one morning and says, "you know what? I'm gonna try gay today". However, I do believe it is more nurture than nature. But, I'm interested in your response to the murder thing (and no, I was not trying to make a direct correlation between the two). But your point about some people more prone, due to their genes. Science has also found the same regarding things like alcohol; that some people are more prone to becoming alcoholics than others. That doesn't mean they all WILL become one; just that they are more prone to. That's kind of where I lean with the whole homo/hetero thing. I think there may be some people more prone to being homosexual. I also believe that situations/issues from early childhood (nurture) can play a role.
I will say this; I believe homosexuality is a sin. But you know what? I'm sure I've sinned quite a few times today myself. Just because I may not agree with an aspect of someone's lifestyle doesn't mean I have a problem with that person. I'm sure many of my friends (gay or straight) don't agree with every decision I make.
Science has also found the same regarding things like alcohol; that some people are more prone to becoming alcoholics than others. That doesn't mean they all WILL become one; just that they are more prone to. That's kind of where I lean with the whole homo/hetero thing. I think there may be some people more prone to being homosexual. I also believe that situations/issues from early childhood (nurture) can play a role.
Okay, this statement is much more reasonable then your first that claimed that homosexuality was caused by abuse at a young age. Obviously there is a complex relationship between our genetics and our environment, but certainly what the evidence points to is that biology plays a significant role. This is probably balanced with social pressures and other factors in our development, but unless you can show me some study that connects homosexuality with childhood abuse, I'm definitely going to be skeptical of that particular theory.
All I am going to say about the whole "homosexuality is a sin" thing is that homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone, and therefore I fail to see how it could be "sinful." Then again I'm an atheist so I don't base my morality off of a religious text but on reason.
Well, I can find just as many scientific links debunking the "gay gene" Theory as you can find supporting it, and same goes for the link between childhood abuse and homosexuality. But I did find this interesting one, that shows arguments from doctors on both sides. http://borngay.procon.org/viewanswers.asp?questionID=000029
My point is it is a theory, just like the gay gene is a theory; both have support, and both need further studies.
As far as the whole sin/Christian/Athiest thing goes, we'll leave that alone. You're not going to change my mind, and I'm not going to change yours. I'll respect your beliefs (or, I guess, lack thereof) as you respect mine on that issue.
Why change from who you are! God is all forgiving so would forgive you for being gay anyway and hes all powerfull so he must have made gay people in the first place.
Forgiveness is a gift from God,; a gift is not a gift unless you receive it. So for God to forgive you for being Gay, "you" as a gay person would have to receive the gift, which would require you to realize you need forgiveness. And logic follows that if you need forgiveness, then you were doing something wrong.
If your just suppressing your gay urges, then your gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay. If God doesn't like gay people, then why'd he make people gay?
Is this even a legitament argument? I'm only asking this because if I was lesbian, I wouldn't like having a load of religionist propaganda shoved down my throat. Bein gay/lesbian/bisexual isn't a choice, it's how you were born, it's like trying to change your gender by thought alone, it can't be done! Come on, you said yourself in the description that 'ex-gays' have just learned to supress their urges and try to be straight. It's like if being gay was normal, you would have to kiss, etc, etc with the same gender as you, which wouldn't be very nice, would it?
It is impossible to change your sexuality..point blank, I don't believe sexuality can be changed. If it were that simple then many many people would do it. In the early stages of awakening, before they accept themselves, young homosexuals often wish to change and try very hard to. They don't succeed. If it were possible to change your sexuality there would be very few homosexuals in the world because it takes most of us a long time to fully come to terms with who we are and accept ourselves.
No you can not change who you are no matter how much "therapy" you go to.
As recently as the last century, teachers would tie a child’s left hand in a vain attempt to make them right-handed. While a left-handed person can force himself to write right-handed, just as a gay person can force himself to live a heterosexual lifestyle, that doesn’t make the leftie a rightie or the gay man straight. Some people (the ambidextrous or the bisexual) would find it relatively easy to move from one behavior to the other, but for most of us, changing our sexuality would be as impossible as learning to write as precisely or throw a ball as accurately with our non-dominant hand as with our dominant hand.
I'm not saying you're wrong, mostly because I am a lesbian, but lately I have been having different sexual needs. I'm not saying that I will change but I am saying that sometimes we have no controll over what/who we love. Even if I LOVE the same sex (which I do) I still may find myself wanting a man.
"Pray the Gay away" is just a way of saying " I have hate towards people who aren't like me". In my opinion that quote along with anyone who uses it is nothing. That's like a man saying "Pray the females away" vise versa.
If my child was born gay I wouldn't hate, I wouldn't send him off because even if he completely commits to being gay who says that he won't change? He may end up marrying a woman. Just because someone says they are gay does not mean that he/she will be gay forever. People change along with emotions, intellectuall thoughts, sexual attractions, and sexual orientation. A lot of people say " being gay is a choice" sometimes it is and sometimes it not. If you say that you are gay or lesbian at a young age, who knows for sure that you will be gay/lesbian forever?
NO ONE can determine who other people will end up loving.
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Somehow I am not surprised that you would go for the "hate mongering" argument. Does this debate look like an attack to your religion to you? Because I can tell you that it's not. Those camps have NOTHING to do with Christianity and debating their practices is neither hate mongering nor is it an attack towards the religion those camps have attached themselves to. I put the Straight to Jesus picture on there to expose this manipulative attachment, not to criticize Christianity.
Because you posted on this side of the debate and said the debate was hate mongering for a second I was like "Wow JakeJ realizes that trying to cure homosexuals is a fake and horrible practice." I was really proud that you were starting to learn to be tolerant of other people. I didn't understand though why Pineapple was disagreeing with you. Then I realized that you were saying this debate is hateful toward Christianity, and I facepalmed.
Many Christians do think they need to save gays by converting them to heterosexuality. This is a real and common practice. I don't see how making a debate about the efficacy of trying to change someone's sexual preference is hate mongering. It's funny how you are actually pretty bigoted toward other people, but whenever anyone mentions Christianity you freak out and say they are hateful.
He's actually being pretty douchey here, I think. He deemed this debate spam so he won't have defend his underendable point of view, and look like an idiot again. He's burnt out on it.
This really pisses me off. First he attacked the debate for fear mongering. I thought fair enough, stay away from it then.
But now I found out that he has been coming here downvoting arguments without adding a reason. He basically downvoted 4 arguments in the "Bullshit" side because they didn't agree with his views.
Well, human beings are complicated creatures and it is POSSIBLE that someone can be changed... it doesn't mean that shoving religion down someone's throat will actually do it.
Really, it would take extreme therapy to do so... possibly Aversion Therapy, but through this it will also result in many other bad things.
Becoming Gay is part of an Unstable Extrovert (usually, but not always). This doesn't mean that Unstable Extroverts are more likely to be gay, though, so don't bitch.
Unstable people (meant in a psychology way, not an insulting way so calm the fuck down) have a fluster of emotions that can alter their perspective on things and they are easily influential, especially at an early age. Note: if an unstable child grows up with a gay parent it won't rub off on them, so please don't get any ideas. It usually comes from a series of incidents or events that are very subtle.
So, if an Unstable Gay were to want to become straight for some reason, there is a slight possibility that it can be done. usually, the gay will easily relapse, but there can be a change in their sexuality through extensive and extreme therapy... but back to the relapse, it's pretty easy for them to go back to their old ways... it's what they grew up with and understand.
So... it's not exactly impossible to change someone's sexuality.
"Since 2006, the use of aversion therapy to treat homosexuality has been in violation of the codes of conduct and professional guidelines of the American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association."
Aversion therapy is not a widely accepted practice. Additionally it only stops the behavior, not the desire. So homosexuals might not have sex, but they would still want to so they are still gay. You can't change someone's sexuality. You can force them from acting upon it, but you can't change it.
As a sidenote one of my favorite books/movies deals with aversion therapy: A Clockwork Orange
Well, Aversion Therapy hasn't been done in quite some time, so that should be nil.
I guess all the gays who claim that they're straight now... that's the only real evidence out there. I don't use it myself, I believe in biological psychology as an explanation... it's like math really. Some things have never been proven or tested, but mathematically it makes sense so you figure it does. Even though there are hundreds of gays who claim that they've turned straight (and claim that until they die), i still don't like that. I really think it takes much more than some psyche sessions and Jesus worship to change sexuality. But, in this case, since you're the evidence man, i'll point to that.
As I have mentioned on the other side of the debate, the evidence pertaining to individuals who supposedly changed is now revealed to have been faked. These camps basically needed the success stories in order to sell their services, so they made them up.
So far, from what I have seen, everybody else that is claiming to have changed and is talking about it publicly, is either working for the camp or is receiving a paycheck from the camp for advertising the success story. Either way, there is financial benefit for this person as long as they maintain the story...
Sorry i don't have names. I don't have patience with Google. All i find are either religious sites talking about their treatment or movements against the whole "change gays to straight" but no actual names, and i refuse to site a Christian site as my source (no names anyway, so what's the point).
one very interesting site though about pedophilia... so i guess i got something out of it.
Listen, I don't actually believe that prayer can change sexual orientation... i think anyone who claims that is just back in the closet. But, judging from the fluidity of the sexual, human mind, I don't think it's completely IMPOSSIBLE to change someone's sexual orientation.
As I'm sure you understand one guy in a movie isn't really evidence. I respect you for not citing Christian propaganda though. I understand what you are saying about the fluidity of human sexuality, but I think you are a bit confused. I agree that sexuality is fluid, but I think you don't really understand what that means. It doesn't mean that your sexuality changes over time, it means that sexuality is more than gay or straight, that there is a continuum. If someone is bisexual they could stop having sex with people of the same gender, but that doesn't make them straight.
He said "I don't believe anyone is gay", and yet, as they were hugging and Maher joked about the man being aroused, he answered "No, sorry, I can't do that", which is quite sad. It's not that he's not gay, it's that he feels he's not allowed to be.
.
And by the way... here is an example of what "reparative therapy" looks like...
Well I'm not being funny but... a therapy where this guy pretends to be the daddy?... and the other guy rests on this guys lap?... and this guy then strokes him and says "you're daddy's favorite boy"?... and the other guy feels all safe in the hands of "daddy"?... isn't that like the number one sexual fantasy of the gay population?
And I don't know HOW that reporter kept a straight face when he started beating the pillow and blaming Mom!
Probably. I've never conducted an experiment myself (all types are considered unethical now). I think women are a great example on how sensitive the human sexuality can sometimes be. Mainly because women are extremely emotionally unstable, and their sexual attraction to someone is 80% emotional. With men it's harder, but the gay ones are usually much more emotionally unstable than the straights.
think of it as kicking a bad habit...ok...u know how the e harmony ads
make the people look like they were ment to be together...im not saying i believe in internet dating...but studies show that people with certain face structures are attracted to people with a certain other facial structure
What does eHarmony and facial structures have to do with "kicking a bad habit?" Also, being gay isn't a habit. Its a part of who you are. Its not like biting nails where you can just get rid of it.
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Homosexuality is a "sin" because marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman only. I believe this much, that religious marriages should only be heterosexual. But people believe homosexuality is a sin because it ends up as sex between two people who are not married. It is as much of a sin as pre-marital sex. I, however, have no problem whatsoever with gays and I wish they could have every right that straight couples could get besides a religious marriage, which I really have no say over anyways. ;) Therefore, I've never thought it was a sin.
Because my religion is not my brain. What my religion thinks is not what my brain thinks. The two will never agree 100%. This is the same for the majority of the world population that is religious. If we all wanted religions that perfectly agreed with us, we would each have our own one!
Then how can you claim to be religious. Aren't you supposed to conform to religion, and not the other way around. Sorry but you sound so full of crap.
Honestly, your argument is that, "I agree with the parts of religion that sound nice, and disagree with the parts that don't." I mean, come on, what's really the point then?
The point is, I agree with most of what my religion says, not because the Pope says is, but because I agree with it. This is one case out of a handful that I disagree with. Besides, I believe in the central dogma of the Church, which is the real crux of religion. Everything else is morality. And morals are dependent on the person, not the faith. So yes, it is very possible to be religious and not "conform to your religion."
So you just ignore parts of scripture then? And scripture is the Holy word of God? Your directly ignoring God then you know. And that doesn't sound like a good Christian now does it?
Haha, well you have just about the most f-up sense of Christianity I've ever encountered. But whatever, I really don't think we're making any progress on anything at all, so goodnight, and enjoy your "religion."
I will enjoy my religion. I enjoy it every day of my life because it is independent of my morality. My religion is my belief in Christ and the central dogma of the church. My morality has nothing to do with this; sometimes it disagrees with the church but most of the time it agrees. I'm sorry if this is hard for me to explain, but it's 3:30 am and I can't sleep. I'm exhausted, but when my head touches that pillow, I'm wide awake. -_-
I don't think they should be allowed religious marriages either, which they usually don't get. My sister is getting married in August and she had to go through so much to try and get married in this one church nearby- really beautiful church. But nobody in our family is a member of that church, so they wouldn't let us marry her there. I think all churches either are like that or should be.
Honestly, I don't know. I know gays want the Church to change its position, which is close to impossible. But I think is all boils down to oppression, hate, and fear. I think the people who are against gays entirely have one of these traits in reference to gays. They are raised that way, unfortunately, and there is little we can do to change them, but we can get at their kids and teach them tolerance for all orientations and races, etc.
It was his choice insofar as his mind was overcome with pressure from others to conform. Nevertheless, it's always impossible to debate homosexuality with christians, because they have an irrefutable argument: "it's sin."
And my last post was well more than 50 characters. Are you saying it was a "dumb joke"?
The 50 characters thing is what it tells you when your argument is too short, in red text above the box. People paste it since it's at least 50, and it's the closest thing to copy over easily.
And I think that the practice is actually pretty annoying. It's really not that hard to come up with at least 50 characters to fill in the argument. See?
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
"Nevertheless, it's always impossible to debate homosexuality with christians, because they have an irrefutable argument: "it's sin.""
Thank you so much for lumping me in like that and for generalizing all Christians to be against gays, especially when many gays are Christian and many gay activists are Christian, I'm sure. Specifically, I know somebody on this site who is both gay and Christian! But I'll let that person tell you on his/her own. :)
Well, I was only able so assume based on your profile stating you are a christian and the fact that the Bible clearly states over and over that homosexuality is a sin. I've never understood how one can manage both beliefs at once.
As far as I am concerned, there is no Bible passage that says "Being gay is a sin and all homosexuals will go straight to hell." There are stories relating to homosexuality, like Sodom and Gomorrah, but I believe this all stems from the fact that marriage is between man and woman. I've always believed that the point of life is to be happy and to make others happy. Since being gay does no harm to others but can actually make another gay person happy as well, I can justify others being gay. If this goes against my religion, then I guess I'm just a bad Catholic. ;)
Really? Well it looks like you haven't been paying attention:
Corinthians 6:9 - Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals.
Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Jude 7 - So also Sodom and Gomorrah and the neighboring towns, since they indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire in a way similar to these angels, are now displayed as an example by suffering the punishment of eternal fire.
...Dozens of others.
So were you really just ignorant of these, or did you just try to brush them off?? Especially the Jude one clearly refutes what you just said. How do you explain that??
I'm sorry I haven't been reading my Bible recently. ;)
So no, I haven't been paying much attention. But scripture really isn't everything. The only thing I was upset about was the fact that you generalized being Christian as against gays. And I know from my social connections this is not the case.
I'm sorry but i have to call bullshit on this one. I guarantee I know more about Christian doctrine than you. Christian doctrine is definitely against gays, and that simply isn't debatable. Honestly, no mainstream christian will allow homosexuality. It's just so absurd, because it is directly condemned so many times in scripture.
I know Christian doctrine is against homosexuality! But Christians themselves aren't necessarily against gays. Obviously, a priest or a deacon or a layperson would be against gays, but a regular, run of the mill Christian might not be. Kind of like me.
How can you call yourself Christian without believing in Christian doctrine? I mean, pardon me, but isn't that kind of the point? Because if your just going to make up your own rules as you go, why do you need Christianity?
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
I love anecdotal evidence when supporting an argument. But are you 100% sure that he is "cured"? I am almost certain, even though I don't know him, that he is just suppressing his homosexual nature and acting straight....
Well it is also possible he's bisexual or he was going through a phase... Because that really sounds changed, but I know sexual orientation cannot just change like that. It's part of who we are, like a fingerprint.
Well lets just hope that he doesn't "change back" one day and leaves his wife and children to break free of his sexual oppression.
I mean, if people want to be something, fine. You can "be" anything you want to be. It's a free country. But I'm hoping that this religious oppression doesn't end in more harm.
If your mother or father were "ex-gay" and were just a person pretending to be gay, and one day figured out that that was not how they wanted to live life anymore. That they wanted to be with a person of the same sex, and had never really loved your other parent at all, would you not feel lost? I don't think we should take those chances and oppress those people in that manor.
I'd rather have gay parents, than parents who don't really love each other.
And I'm sure it's going to work for Larry Craig, too. When will you Christians understand that you suck just as much cock as we do, but in a different way? :P
(Was that a great way to cultivate cooperation or what?)
EDIT: Oh, I almost forgot to mention the almost utter inadmissability of anecdotal evidence in a debate. We're debating a system to effect change on many people, so unless you can find statistical trends that back it up, it's bunk.