CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Proof of God, Scientific sense
Apologies to stephen hawkins whom i have insulted severally because atheists on this site misquoted him or rightly quoted him in wrong situations which led me to think he was equally as idiotic as they are. At least, he is agnostic and for sensible reasons......(my opinion can still change when exposed to some new knowledge worth my attention)
I love how I look at atheists and say that they completely ignore science, but they look at me and say "you believe in a God? you must completely ignore science!"
What a truly dreadful video where an idiotic commentator claims that the world at science is ' staggered ' at the revelations made in this pile of bullshit , if that's the case where are these scientists that are so convinced by this bullshit ?
You also resort to typically lying about Hawkings beliefs , he's an atheist you idiot , in his own words .........
According to Huffington Post, Stephen Hawking says he's an atheist, arguing that science offers a "more convincing explanation" for the origins of the universe and that the miracles of religion "aren't compatible" with scientific fact.
"Before we understood science, it was natural to believe that God created the universe, but now science offers a more convincing explanation," the celebrated physicist said in a video posted by Spanish newspaper El Mundo. "What I meant by 'we would know the mind of God' is we would know everything that God would know if there was a God, but there isn't. I'm an atheist."
Hawking's remarks came in response to a question from El Mundo journalist Pablo Jauregui, who quizzed Hawking about his religious leanings in the lead-up to this week's Starmus Festival in the Canary Islands. The "mind of God" reference was Hawking's effort to clarify a passage in his 1988 book "A Brief History of Time," in which he wrote that scientists would "know the mind of God" if a unifying set of scientific principles known colloquially as the theory of everything were discovered.
You also resort to typically lying about Hawkings beliefs
Says the guy who spent 4 days telling lies about Niels Harrit because he couldn't debunk his science. Your double standards are shameful. You're a retard who doesn't believe in climate science. Enough said.
Says the guy who won't admit that Haritt lied on Danish TV and that he was not peer reviewed ,he has no science to de -bunk
LOL.
The reviewer's name is Prof. David L. Griscom. Among his impressive credentials, Prof. Griscom is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and a Fellow of the AAAS. I quote a brief excerpt from his blog and encourage you to read all of it:
"The 2009 publication in The Open Chemical Physics Journal (TOCPJ) of a fabulous paper by Harrit et al. entitled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”:-
"Some disparagers of the 9/11 Truth movement have alleged that TOCPJ is a place on the web where anybody can buy a publication without peer review. Absolutely false! I know this because I was one of the referees of the Harrit et al. paper. The editors asked for my opinion. And after about two weeks of studying what the authors had written, checking relevant references, and gathering my thoughts, I finally provided my advice to authors in 12 single-spaced pages, together with my recommendation to the Editors that they publish the paper after the authors had considered my suggestions. Still, some skeptical readers may ask how anyone can rate a scientific paper as “fabulous.” Well, I am the principal author of 109 papers (and a co-author of an additional 81) in peer-review journals. And have refereed a least 600, and possibly as many as 1000, manuscripts. So you would be right in calling me an aficionado of articles published in scientific journals. And I found absolutely nothing to criticize in the final version of the Harrit et al. paper! Apropos, twelve of my own publications have appeared in the American Institute of Physics’ Journal of Chemical Physics (an old fashioned paper journal), so it is accurate to say that chemical physics (of inorganic materials) is my main specialty."
Hilarious 😂😂😂another Copy and paste mock up by an 9/11 'truther ' , your bullshit is getting desperate Haritt was never peer reviewed and he was caught lying on Danish TV ; it's seems you share similar traits with him doesn't it ?
There you go bringing up Jews again typical holocaust denier ; you're absolutely shameless and a prize retard to go with it .
Amusing that you use the term ' intelligence ' which is something you totally lack ; anyone who disagrees with your gibberish is labelled 'a retard ' which is hilarious coming from a holocaust denier
I put forward a debate about the genetic code proving design last week, so you are late. In fact, I first put this debate forward in 2008, so you are very late.
You also are wrong. Evidence of design is not (necessarily) evidence of God. Not unless you redefine your understanding of God and throw out all the fire and brimstone, bearded pillar of wisdom bullshit. If my friend Dave writes the code for an open world computer game, then that does not make my friend Dave a god to anybody except the characters in the video game. And if Dave himself is a religious man, then everything becomes a gigantic clusterfuck. It's a question of perspective.
God is simply a concept humanity invented to explain their inexplicable predicament (i.e. on a rock in the middle of nowhere). Over time, that concept was refined, patented and exploited by people looking to use it to their own advantage. Throw the idea of God away and reassess the situation from a purely scientific perspective. Either the universe was designed or it came about by accident. But if it was designed, then that does not necessarily make the designer God in the literal sense.
Also you are trying to tell me there is design without a designer.
No, that appears to be a straw man argument you have made up on the spot because you can't get your head around the possibility that a designer doesn't necessarily have to be a bearded omnipotent wizard who gave us ten commandments to obey.
I am disputing that, if there was a designer, it necessarily has to be the biblical God, as implied by the initial debate statement.
You never stated it clearly this way.
The main bases of the video was to prove first that there is a designer(God) in science.
Then he added his personal notions to attempt to describe the character or nature of the designer(God) by relating it to the way His creations behave which is 'relationship'; family, friendship etc.
He must have created his creations with most of his character; love, anger, relationships.
You must understand a creator is also a father(relationship).
Relationship is religion not science.
When your father is also your boss(designer) at work(universe).
Work is strictly business; principles, ethics, logistics, formalities~ science.
As a father, he can give favours without any ethical formalities and outlookers will not understand(Religion).
(Just like i see people inlove are just being stupid, it doesn't make sense)
Religion was established by the creator(a conscious intelligent being over trillion times than any human ) to have a mutual relationship beyond chemistry, physics, biology(formalities) with man.
And the only logical religion is the Christian God. The Bible makes predictions about the universe long before it was proven by science or time.
Look at what islam is doing to the world. Other religions do not claim a God but many gods(even there is conflict among some and possibily couldn't have come together to create this one world, even if half created it, the others will be taking time destroying their enemy's universe back to ashes~millions of years no signs in space, and enemies couldn't be existing the universe owned by their enemies........it simply was created by one).
Atheism is being a bastard(fatherless) and jobless(no boss~ you can't be atheist and call yourself a scientist; a clown you are).
Oh, so it's my fault you deliberately misinterpreted my argument is it? Jolly good. Except if there were any confusion you could have simply asked for clarification instead of inventing your own false version of what I said.
The main bases of the video was to prove first that there is a designer(God) in science.
The words designer and God are not interchangeable you gigantic fuckwit. That's the entire basis of my argument.
I do not believe morality even exists in the objective sense.
I did not highlight this part because it transcends deeper into religion.
But addressing it, you and i could be judged on moral bases from how we have argued here. You have been insultive throughout which could easily qualify you for hell and i opposite.
Because you enjoy sin and everyone else around you seem to, it doesn't conclude the whole universe does. There people who are extremely moral and are influenced by one thing or another(Bible, Experience, Culture, etc.)
I know for a fact that more than 95% of Americans will go to hell.
Every sin is justified.....Gay, Transgender, Ocean of shameless fornication(fashion), Disrespect to elders, atheism, evil political conspiracies, demonic churches etc. And i am not surprised if any American says morality does not exist, you are just saying what you see(around you). The 21st Century Sodom and Gomorrah. Children will grow up as such no chains of morality.....it only exist in words.
Americans are so delusive that they think what is happening in their country is the same as everywhere.
(One even said America can destroy both Russia and China at once).
Becareful, there are people living very different from you.
In my country a Gay will be beaten to death thus；after being denounced by parents. That is morality, hate for perversion, and not condoning , which goes beyond laws or anything like human rights(equal to armed robbery).
You try to define it as babarism as an American but that is why you will never make it to heaven as an american you have no value or essence for your soul but it's all about flesh. Flesh(fleshy desires) is to be roasted by fire in the long run.
What a dishonest video. The 3 points it is peddling as being new facts are 1) the universe had a beginning 2) the universe is just right for life (I guess he meant the Earth but whatever) and 3) DNA coding reveals intelligence.
None of this is new people. Fake news! waves tiny little hands
Saying it's fake news is not an argument you know right? Take the points one by one and refute them in the same sense......……………………………………………………………:……��………………………………��…………………
A nice little video if you are of a Christian persuasion, and for those who are easily swayed it could be a decider. However, it does not present anything new or untold, and the only claim is the same old story that all of these 'special conditions' must be the work of an intelligent designer or god.
It only leaves you, at the end of the day, with the overwhelming sense that everything we know is balanced on a cosmic knife edge, and we still do not know how or why. Is it by design or is it a happy coincidence waiting to be proven by being repeated elsewhere in the universe?
An atheist or a devout believer could equally fight their corner as a result of this video, and the agnostics could probably watch it over and over again, so it will be loads of fun for them.
There have been no earth shattering discoveries or revelations made here.
