CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
We don't need to, Jesus was a man, it is proven to be so. But he wasn't the son of any gods nor was a he a prophet. He was nothing more than a man! He was born around 6 B.C.E.
Lol, your a stupid one aren't you? Mohammed was also a person, much like Jesus, trying to spread some crazy religion. I believe that means your failing in history?
Sorry if I seemed cocky, I was confused but I understand now. About both Vishnu and the Equations vs. Inequalities.
Though I now agree with you on the equality vs inequality minidebate, I believe you may be mislead on what Vishnu is.
Vishnu is not "a God". Hinduism is not polytheistic. Hinduism is not Monotheistic. Some (me) might argue Hinduism is not theistic at all.
Vishnu is just a form of God. So are we, so is the Pope, so is Elie Weisel, so was Hitler. Hinduism is nondualistic. Hinduism is monistic.
Vishnu isn't/wasn't/isn't going to be anything seperate than you or me. He/She/It is a force called nature. Us Hindus just like to give it a name so we can understand it's qualities and live in better harmony with it.
There is not an equation that can prove the existence of God, but there are countless formulas which prove the existence of Vishnu. They include e=mc^2, f=ma, infinity=infinity +or-or*or/K, and all laws of Nature. This is God, nature is God. And we can become better if we learn to harness the formulas for Nature/God/Vishnu so we know how to live within it's realm: the universe.
Sorry if that is unclear, I don't know how to present it more concisely than that.
No, but I can not make an equation for it as the parameters Christian's self applied to the equation of Jesus are not trustworthy and are nothing more than random guesses.
No, but I can not make an equation for it as the parameters Christian's self applied to the equation of Jesus are not trustworthy and are nothing more than random guesses.
If Jesus existed, what do you believe he would have been like, according to the Bible?
According to the Bible, he would look like the stereotypical white, brown haired, middle-aged man. He seems to be passionate, wise, and morally secure. However, we can not confirm any of this until we have an equation which uses real evidence.
According to the Bible, he would look like the stereotypical white, brown haired, middle-aged man. He seems to be passionate, wise, and morally secure. However, we can not confirm any of this until we have an equation which uses real evidence.
He seems a very interesting guy.
If he existed, what do you think everybody would have truly thought of him?
Yet I could also provide an argument or an 'equation' that disproves that you have sanity, or could perhaps prove that you've got two fucking penis's under your pants. Either way, both arguments could have a logical outcome, IF we knew those circumstances would be pressured.
Yet I could also provide an argument or an 'equation' that disproves that you have sanity, or could perhaps prove that you've got two fucking penis's under your pants. Either way, both arguments could have a logical outcome, IF we knew those circumstances would be pressured.
So sane people have penis's under their pants?
I see.
So sane and rational people are either gay/bi men or straight/bi women but never straight men and never lesbian women?
Honestly?
So our mathematical formula for sanity would be p x g x b - w / m = sanity.
So sane people have penis's under their pants? I see
Insane people get unusually angry at small things like this, so have I got a flipping penis? Boy, you better be careful because you might be at risk of being sexist! Remind me the debate was about sexism and not Jesus?
Insane people get unusually angry at small things like this, so have I got a flipping penis? Boy, you better be careful because you might be at risk of being sexist! Remind me the debate was about sexism and not Jesus?
You mentioned people who had TWO penises under the pants, not one.
This implies that the person is gay.
I don't recall anybody naturally having two penises.
Nor do I ever remember anything called figurative speech, or maybe I forgot I just asked a question? Either way, if you don't give a proper argument, I'm just going to leave the conversation!
Nor do I ever remember anything called figurative speech, or maybe I forgot I just asked a question? Either way, if you don't give a proper argument, I'm just going to leave the conversation!
If what you said was a figure of speech, it would still be fallacious.
It is my decision if you are to leave the debate or not!
Whereas......J = Jesus and P = proof and 0P = zero proof. Thusly..the odds of Jesus existing are less than E which equals existence. So in summation...being less than existing is to not exist.
Jesus existed, but he wasn't the son of God or a prophet. Just a crazy religious rabbi. In fact there is a lot of proof about his existence. I will bring link evidence (that has been provided by Athiests) of his existence.
Whereas......J = Jesus and P = proof and 0P = zero proof. Thusly..the odds of Jesus existing are less than E which equals existence. So in summation...being less than existing is to not exist.
