CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Remember Romney's 47% comment? Hillary just called half of Trump supporters deplorable!
WOW! How stupid can she be? She just called millions of Americans deplorable!
Now I want you to witness before your eyes the hideous liberal bias in most of our media. Other than Fox news, you will see her unbelievable condesending eletist hateful words buried very quickly.
Remember Mitt Romney's 47% comment about how 47% of Americans will vote for Obama no matter what. His words overheard by someone in the audience were played non stop all the way up to the election by the biased media. He was crucified for his words.
Those words were not even in the same ballpark with Hillary's eletist Big brother insulting attacks on millions of Americans who would vote for Trump. She labeled them all sorts of names (homophobes, xenophobia, Islamaphobe, and many more).
These words spewed by Hillary would be the death sentence for any Repubican but when the Democrat party has most of the media in bed with them, she will once again escape accountability as she did with the emails, benghazi, and all of her scandals. Those on the Left will STILL vote for this condescending extremist. Remember when she said she cares about the middle class? LOL, no she thinks you are deplorable if you vote for Trump. We all know that Democrats care only for their voting blocks. The rest of us are deplorable.
She just showed all the world what Conservatives have known for decades. Liberals are arrogant extremist control fanatics who believe they are the enlightened ones who must transform America to their progressive socialistic ideology. They believe they know better how we should spend our money. They will redistribute our hard earned money to their voting blocks. PURE ARROGANT CORRUPTION!
Those words were not even in the same ballpark with Hillary's eletist Big brother insulting attacks on millions of Americans who would vote for Trump. She labeled them all sorts of names (homophobes, xenophobia, Islamaphobe, and many more).
True. Romney was way fucking worse. Romney attacked people who vote for him. Romney attacked people who the Republicans claim they can help better than Democrats. Romney's statement caused the Republican party to shit itself. Labeling people that hate gays as homophobes is not a bad thing. It is attacking someone for their beliefs.
STOP BRINGING UP REPUBLICAN SCREW UPS WHEN YOU ATTACK HILLARY. IT MAKES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY LOOK STUPID.
Hold up there Democrat you mean to say Hillary can talk about what she really thinks bout Americans but if Trump talks about Mexicans he is unfit for president. You have an open forum explain yourself.
Oh he's unfit for president for his policies not what he says. What he says, apart from being 99% broken sentences that a Mexican would probably make an English speech using, well he's an okay talker.
Now you said the KKK was started in 1974 are you truly that ignorant of history. I am enjoying your spin and your stupidity so continue to entertain me.
I said: "he founded the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan" (emphasis added.) Perhaps it is you that doesn't know the structure or history of the klan. Considering all the things you are ignorant about, maybe this one isn't so bad...
Let me expose you for the dummy you are. Original Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (Louisiana 1964-1965) so said by the FBI. Now can you imagine who the Governor of Louisiana was at that time ? Yes a Democrat by the name of John Julian McKeithen (May 28, 1918 – June 4, 1999) was the 49th governor of Louisiana, with service from 1964 to 1972. A Democrat from the rural town of Columbia, he was the first governor of his state in the twentieth century to serve two consecutive terms.
This is going to be impossible for you to understand, but the "Original Knights of the KKK" are not the same people as the "Knights of the KKK". They would have 2 different formation dates.
The Original Knights of the KKK is a different group than the Knights of the KKK.
Duke claimed to be part of the Knights of the KKK (chartered in 1956 - ref), but the people that were there with him said he started his own group - ref
Does Matthew Heimbach (founder of a white nationalist group) support Trump?
Does the American National Super PAC (founded by William Johnson who runs a white nationalist political party the American Freedom Party) make robocalls on Trump's behalf?
Was Trump endorsed by the Neo-Nazi blog The Daily Stormer?
You can't refute things that the people themselves freely admit.
I am going to use your words to expose you for the fool you are and guess what you signed up for it by showing your own stupidity. Better learn some history Democrat and get off that Democrat Kool-AID.
Hillary is a brain damaged candidate that the Democrats just can't deal with. The woman does not know what she is saying hell she can barely make in into a van. She is to compromised for high ranking Democrats and they are already looking for a replacement for the idiot !
Actually I agree with you it was stupid and I agree it has strong parallels to Romney's 47% comment.
Yet here's the "however". However,
1) Just the same as Trump's tough straight talk makes his supporters smile so does hers. Quite frankly the people who are not already in the Trump camp have this low of an opinion of him and his supporters.
2) Demographics allow Democrats to get away with this but not Republicans. Seriously. The size of political party affiliations in this country go a) Independents, b) Democrats, c) Republicans in that order, and Republicans are only about 2/3 the Democrat size. You can find this in Pew data and I've pasted into this web site several times in the past on other debates. My point is a Republican MUST make up ground from Independents or opposition in order to have a chance to win and alienating those groups makes that a fail. Meanwhile, Democrats have more numbers already, so they just need to not lose from what they've already got. She'll probably get away with this comment whereas Romney did not.
Finally, 3) consider this: the conservatives and Republicans on this site ROUTINELY insult and smear both Democrats and Independents. Can't you see now why you NEVER succeed in converting anyone from the neutral or far side of the political aisle to your cause? You pretty much daily do exactly what Romney and Clinton did, and which you acknowledge is a tactical error on their part. Yet you do it. Think about it.
I think you said this site specific, that I'm not sure of.
But in general, media steers and its liberal and democratic. And they smear, fabricate, steer, ignore news, and blow up other news. The conservatives seem to respect individualism and true free thought. Where as any freedom on the Democrat side is a mirage.
That has no direct clash with my main arguments a) it's comparable to what Trump says and gets praised for, and b) demographics make harm to the Democratic support minimal.
And in terms of c) what people on this site say, there is a nonstop insult of all political opposites on this site. After you discover which will give you a fair shake despite being on the opposite side of the position then keep talking to those folks.
Really? Liberal agendas are birthed in depravity and fester like viruses to blind us. A road to one world government with antichrist reign.
This is the true reality:
The dance of the two step, will stop like musical chairs, those standing the winners, those sitting ensnared.
Satan through time midevil Popes, rules of Rome, the mischief of Jesuits, deceptions unfold, Illuminatie bows to Lucifer, atheism bows to illuminatie, and the world takes his image.
One god of this world, his image a beast, darkened man is his seed.
Their feet go to the depths of Sheol, their hands pull men down, the reach of depravity an eternal unquenchable flame.
God calls out, "Oh naive ones, turn back and be filled, or the feast I've prepared, will catch you and will be your snare!
It's beyond politics, it's depravity to the fullest to the end of our days.
Of course not their snakes in the grass, they are depravity exalted, they are a git with a right hand, then taken by their left hand. They are Hitler and Marxism, and Jesuits of Catholocism, they are the seed of the destroyer marching toward a one world reign sold to the naive as social justice.
They are dark minds of Atheism, Satanism, Luciferism, the are illuminatie and the darkness that has one end goal plan, to fulfill Revelations yet write in a different end.
They are deceptions of depravity on the world's stage, moving the boundaries of darkness as their viruses grow.
That pretty much sums it up!
They are those seared on their forehead, a beast it's image.
These are the left, a fish hook of nonsense, with candy covered worms as its bait!
Voluntary abortion conspicuously doesn't appear in the bible, and causing an abortion by accident is treated as a property crime against the father, not murder, etc.
And we see two evil governments doing its dead, targeting babies with murder. Pharoah who enslaved Egypt, a king and ruler the god of the ancient world in that day. Moses escaped in a basket, but Satan's lust for greed and power through Pharoah who dishonored life, God's creation.
Then another government ruler, Herod, murdered babies in Bethlehem. Again the ruler of this world moving through every generation of our days.
Then you see another reign of terror against the creation of God, Satan's advancements get a head start, of course what did we expect he would do.
God said, from the beginning,
Genesis 3
14 The Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, Cursed are you more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you will go, And dust you will eat
All the days of your life; 15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel.”
God said, Satan is an enemy to our seed! And we know Satan is a murderer and lier from the beginning. will place enmity between your seed and her seed!
Satan was cursed to eat dust, the dust of man's flesh, and to the decay of man's death. Don't worms eat the flesh of man? Is there no end to his appetite?
1 Corinthians 15
38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body.
Romans 4:16
Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,
Luke 21
22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
You can see Satans ugly fingers corrupting man through time.
A shape-shifter, deciever, mutating, festering and doing his will, against God. Taking man as his slaves and branding his cattle, marking them with his ugly beastly image, a beast mind in stead of a man's mind. Frontal lobe seared in the image of Satan, his viral sperm, creating slaves not children, his seed, his image!
Satan the beast tears, rips, and destroys. He is the god of this world, so if you have eyes that can see, and not covered by his snake scales, then maybe instead of opinion, you should stand on truth. Opinions are a dime a dozen at best, but truth is more costly than pure gold. Fill a treasure chest with truth, to have greater wealth, a wealth to pass on, yest riches you can take with you. It's the only wealth you get to keep beyond the grave.
1 John 3
7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.
Revelations 12
15 And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
16 And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
"If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life."
-Exodus 21:22-23
If the woman is hurt, the punishment is eye for an eye, life for life - if the baby is killed, the punishment is a fine.
Pharoah who dishonored life
Did the Pharoah kill all the first-born of Egypt, or did God? (or, grain) Also, were these abortions?
Herod, murdered babies
Again, young children, not abortions.
Did God kill a lot of unborn babies with a worldwide flood killing all but one family on earth?
Pharoah killed all the baby boys of the Hebrews over years, because they were growing and he "felt" that they could fight their way out of slavery. And his riches were made on their backs, so killing their babies was his solution! And it wasn't one day of murder, it was years of murder, murder of babies!
Archeological findings found massive infant graves in the regions of Ancient Egypt. They considered the increase of infant mortality to maybe be an epidemic that effected just babies, but then found the graves to be male babies.
Then followed by adult graves in the period of a lifetime aftet, in their usual life expectancy, graves showed a 30% decline in male population shown in those adult graves with 30 % more female graves during that time period.
The details and time periods match up perfectly to the biblical record of slavery of Hebrews, murders of babies, when Moses would have been born and the Exodus from Egypt, when Moses would have been born an older man.
God did send that plague, after many other plagues. That plague was Gods last plague sent, not His first! That last plague was the only one that moved Pharoah to listen and let His people go! So Pharoah was warned, so he killed Egypt 1st born that Day, not God! They also found massive graves matching this story, With details matching the biblical History of the Exodus event.
Atheists don't just leave out truth and history regarding the biblical text, they change history, close the door to knowledge, and even destroy artifacts.
So in education they teach wrong information, in order to discredit the Bible, and mislead people in order to illuminate biblical faith.
.
That's not true. Free thinkers are really dictators of thought. Atheists and skeptics close the door on finds that prove the Bible. The literally direct it, control it, and it comes down to ruling, one world government, dictatorship.
There has been an agenda throughout history to discredit the Bible even in historic value.
So in the 1930s, they had determined Exodus to be in Rameses as Pharoah. Without finding anything they declared, the bible and God to be dead. Then with atheism force of their agenda, based in Satanism really. Satan rules and the goal is to eliminate God and His people and that's what we see today, no matter how unreasonable, it's a closed door.
But the door was closed for all of you "free thinkers" by the dictating "free thinkers"
1st of all I'll say many Biblical scholars were asleep at the wheel. So they are to blame for apathy.
Genesis is very detailed on geneology, just math tells you the approx time period of Exodus.
There was a place called Rameses generations before Exodus, because the word Rameses as in the place, the jumped to a conclusion, and instead of using simple math, the intellectuals did it their way, conveniently.
So your a historian you have simple math in ancient texts, do you study it? Or assume based on word association?
Apparently simple is to easy for the atheist and skeptic, so let's just go with word association!
"Patterns of Evidence-Exodus" is a well done documentary proving all stories from Joseph to Moses to the walls of Jericho!
Right were it's supposed to be be by my own study of simple math in geneology purposely detailed by God in Genesis.
Also location is tricky for a few reason, changes in names modern map compared to ancient map. And also commercialization, if a location says this is a Biblical place, the location can make money in tourism, some areas welcome that and exploit it. Whereas other government do not at all want to confirm biblical artifacts and places.
One factor is Muslim countries do not want to cooperate with confirming biblical History, for obvious reasons.
And all these are obstacles the dictators of free thought don't tell the little free thinkers, because the dictating free thinkers want to discredit the Bible and remove God and Christianity.
Only Jews and Christians, although there are some that want to eliminate violence of Muslims, the religion doesn't bother them.
None of the others bother them, why? Because Satan is behind it, and he is still trying to ascend above God.
The question I have, same with liberal media, I get conservatives do it also, but not nearly to the degree of liberals.
In liberal politics, the free thinkers dictatorship organizations are working conspiracies, and universities also have been infiltrated, Republican also have been infiltrated. But the left is much more of a useful tool. They are tools! And media and universities all tools. Using each other by taught skills of exploitation, manipulation, using everything, even causing harm, to "fix it"
Because the goal is one world rule, basically one world communism. The question is, do you think they wear that on their sleeves, and on display?
So you have this big giant that controls what you get to choose.
So they only allow what they want you to think, and gift wrap it for you all, and call it free thinking! But wouldn't free thinking be to give you all the information and let you all think freely, and conclude freely?
So they found everything in a time line the Bible itself said it would be in, yet they dig 200 years outside of it and tell the world, "see nothing" and when people of integrity in the field show everything, even in sequence of order, they keep the door shut, thereby keeping the door to the little free thinkers minds closed also!
I'd be passed if someone controlled me, I hate it.
Indoctrination through education took root pretty early in American History. As it already established global prominence by elite educators like Dewey.
Dewey and his socialist brotherhood, a hundred years ago, decided they would use the public schools to transform the entire society. They first had to seize control of what is taught in K-12 classrooms. Dewey and his successors settled on two major strategies for controlling what educators call "content."
First, they discarded as much of the traditional curriculum as possible – i.e., knowledge was thrown out the window by the boxload. Secondly, they invented many techniques for scrambling classroom instruction so that knowledge was no longer taught efficiently.
So we have here, across a wide front, a well organized war against knowledge and the transmission of knowledge. Dumbed down schools were created intentionally in order to create dumbed down students. That, my research suggests, is the horrible reality.
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Have you watched Patterns of Evidence-Exodus? I think it may currently be on Netflix.
There are many others documentaries as well. And David Rohn is a great resourse- videos on youtube.
I like the presentation of Patterns of Evidence because it discusses sequences in finding that are in order of the biblical History, and findings or coincidentally seen in a time line are in accurate sequence that match the biblical historic account.
It's denial is more a byproduct of militant atheism, and political control of education for social indoctrination, then for independent thought, and true free thought.
So if there is evidence of Joseph, which there is, and also evidence of the events recorded ie… a long term famine, and also followed by slavery, a massive migration, then conquests of places like Jericho, I'd be inclined to think the digs should be taken seriously, rather than leading education and thought by its denial of the findings and their appropriate applicaton.
And again minds of beasts leading little minds to be minds of beasts! This scripture actually condemns abortion, and also crimes where an unborn child is killed.
The payment if the childs life is lost is life for life!
Seriously? How isn't that plain as day.
If no mischief follows -
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Depart from her - premature delivery! If no mischief or harm to the baby - a fine!
.
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
Premature delivery! If mischief or harm to the baby - not a fine, a life for a life!
On what basis do you say that left-wing outlets "smear, fabricate, steer, ignore news, and blow up other news" while conservative outlets "seem to respect individualism and true free thought"?
Do you want me to go ahead and provide evidence of conservative outlets doing exactly what you accuse left-wing outlets of?
Not an insult at all! Insults are spoken to insult.
I'm not trying to insult anyone.
I've decided a more direct approach is warranted because of time. These issues of this generatiom are born from a place that leads to death, and the whole world is unaware they are set on its path. Quickly now happening, as we stand and where we stand.
So those who are not insulted, should consider a possibility of truth. I know the mark is being seared on foreheads now, right now. It soon will be too late.
Intent is not require for it to be an insult. I asked you to justify your claims regarding left wing media, and your response was to say that people on the left are of the devil.
If you don't understand how that is insulting, then you probably shouldn't be on a debate website.
But this right here demonstrates my point. What you are doing isn't debating, at all.
So why did you come to a debate website to essentially preach (and without even providing any sort of justification or arguments in favor of some of your claims, like this)?
Your correct I am not, I debated yesterday, and found through debates, no matter how logic is presented, people still hold opinions of nonsense. And today, I'm not interested in arguing stupid opinions.
There are most of you, that are ridiculous. You argue an orange ain't an orange just to support wrong wrong wrong stupid opinions.
So now, debate my points, tell me how the mark of the beast is a chip, no doubt a conservative control, no not the left who want to hold hands and be gods, all under one ruler, Satan, the beast of beasts, whose image is taken.
It was an insult within the context of her crazy talk. Among the more "out there" Christians, such as herself, saying people are of Satan is most certainly an insult.
