SPOTLIGHT SERIES - casper3912
This is the Forty-Eighth in an ongoing series of spotlight debates. The purpose of the debate is to "roast" the user (and when I say "roast", I mean in a nice way). Please share all the good, humorous, and otherwise positive aspects about this important user of our community. Don't worry, I will be creating one of these every few days so your name may show up next!
Forty-Seventh in the series - nummi - http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/SPOTLIGHT_SERIES_nummi
Forty-Ninth in the series - TheThinker - http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/SPOTLIGHT_SERIES_TheThinker
|
3
points
2
points
Communists support not only socialism, but the working class. The state is the vehicle of class war, you mistake my support of one side for support of government, and fail to realize how your own support of the other side also supports government, although a much more entrenched and permanent one. I'm sure I read actualizable demand somewhere, although I may of been summing up an idea, irregardless its similar to or the same as effectual demand, as the phrase itself implies. 2
points
Unlike communists and socialists, capitalism supports no classes at all because classes are artificially created by government taxation law, so in a way, it supports everyone. The State loves the class warfare thing because it directly benefits while impoverishes everyone else. I would be interested to read your deluded explanation of how anarcho capitalism supports government in its much more entrenched and permanent way. Apparently, you have a hard time understanding the word anarcho. I have read much more economic literature than you, and actualizable demand is nowhere, you just made it up. 3
points
2
points
It's good to have an Anarcho-Syndicalist type on the site, but his views, as PF pointed out, are very inconsistent. He mostly supports the State. I would argue that he's a Liberal Democrat who's only less Statist than iamdavidh. Hell, I'd say that even I were more Syndicalist than he was, but then again, maybe not. I am against heirarchies, and I do agree with much Marxist philosophy (minus the part that says that Socialism is the economic answer or the inability to distinguish Corporatism from Free Market Capitalism.) Overall, good guy. Smart, free thinker, out of bounds. All that stuff. 2
points
2
points
The only thing I can say is at one point I declared him my enemy... and recently I took him off of that list because I don't have a clue as to why I declared him my enemy (this would be due to a fault in my own memory). But I do not think I have recently debated him, so I can't tell you. O.o 1
point
I will be honest. I do not know much about Casper. And he doesn't know everything about me. But we are great acquaintances. I will like to say friends if there is a mutual agreement of friendship between us. :) I do not know a lot of him to call him intelligent. HOWEVER, he hasn't proven to me that he is non intelligent. And not calling him intelligent saddens me but i think the reason is because i am ignorant. He shown me the "Brain in a vat" so i will say he has a philosophical point of view. And i have seen in mathematical debates and he has a mathematical point of view. And i thank him for showing me "Brain in a vat" because damn, that is interesting stuff. I can't be for sure if he is smart or intelligent. I can't say that for anybody i think. But i can say he is knowledgeable. :) And i think of him as a nice person. :D |
