Santa Fe survivor and CNN challenge Nancy Pelosi on Armed Guards
|
Watch Nanny Pelosi stumble through with what she thinks makes sense. Pelosi has armed guards but how dare we protect the children with armed guards that have guns. It is blatantly obvious that the Democrats do not want innocent people protected but if those innocents cross the border that reaches a level for them. Pelosi proves once again she is a dimwit. 2
points
At CNN's town hall event on Wednesday House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was challenged on her position against hardening schools by funding armed guards. Pelosi has been challenged by such simple questions as: Are MS-13 animals "animals"? What about the leader of Hamas bragging that the "victims" were almost all Hamas... Pelosi was faced with a question by a teen survivor of the recent Santa Fe High School shooting who inquired about arming teachers and was further pressed by CNN's Chris Cuomo who noted that Pelosi herself is protected by armed guards. Pelosi needs guards. She has more to lose... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ The Democrat struggled to find an adequate response often weakly suggesting that this simply was "not the answer" to the school shooting issue while citing "background checks" as part of the solution. More proof they don't want to fix the issue. They need the issue. "Where does the government stand on arming and training our teachers much in the way we use air marshals on airplanes?" asked Santa Fe senior Alexis Wilson. Pelosi offered sympathies to Wilson over the shooting but concluded that she and her Democrat colleagues "do not think that is the solution." A gun grab is their solution. It'll be easier to get the shock collars on us. So Nanny Pelosi does not want to protect the children ! Nope. She wants the issue every time. If kids have to die to give her an election talking point, the end justifies the means. 2
points
1
point
2
points
Like most left wing loonies this waffling political tartuffe knows what she considers shouldn't be done in any given situation, but hasn't the remotest idea where to even start to address this issue which is now a national crisis. As she struts around with her armed guards she has the audacity to object to young defenseless students, who now live under an ever present cloud of assassination, being afforded the same level of protection as she does. Only a loonie left Democrat could could display such a combination of arrogance and ignorance. 1
point
Like most left wing loonies this waffling political tartuffe knows what she considers shouldn't be done in any given situation, but hasn't the remotest idea where to even start to address this issue which is now a national crisis. Hey dopey, it is only by eliminating what should not be done that one can discover what should be done. Anybody who decides something without addressing the potential alternatives is an idiot, so I guess we can include you on that merry list. That must rank as the dumbest reply in the history of create debate as it graphically exposes the eye-watering stupidity of you dumb left wing shitheads who casually meditate over the best solution to a crisis which has been going on for decades, and all the while there are children being slaughtered. ''Well chaps, don't let's go off 'half cocked' here, there's plenty of time to muse over this problem. Now, what's for lunch''? The English language does not contain sufficient derogatory adjectives to describe you and your callous stupidity. It would be a beautiful sight to see what a piece of contemptuous filth such as you would look like if the parents of the murdered children could get their hands on you. 2
points
Hey NomenNazi. Leftists preaching no guns and walls use guns and walls to protect themselves. And when confronted by citizens about this, they double down, and still claim guns and walls are no answer to defending ourselves. That's the entire point of the thread you jagaloon. |
