CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
6
Yes No
Debate Score:9
Arguments:4
Total Votes:10
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (2)
 
 No (2)

Debate Creator

NumberOne(422) pic



Science Is Not Science

To be a part of scientific inquiry, the subject of the inquiry must be observable, testable and repeatable.  Science is none of these things.  Therefore, it is not science.

Yes

Side Score: 3
VS.

No

Side Score: 6
1 point

It's tempting to fight this...

But then I think of the SciFi Channel (now renamed SyFy) and their ludicrous shows like Sharknado and I just have to admit that much of what we slap the label of science on really is a sad excuse for science. Heck if it's poor "science fiction" then either the science or the fiction must be stinking up the place.

Side: Yes
5 points

You are a retarded piece of fuck. Science is the process of testing, observing etc. and it is possible to test and observe and repeat the act of testing observing and repeating.

You can observe someone doing science and if the technology was advanced enough you would be able to monitor their brain activity and understand how it produces "scientific thought"

I should know, I am the 0bserver you ignoramus.

It's a scientific fact that science is scientific because science can scientifically test observe and and molest science in the ass. Yep, science can molest itself in the ass.

Side: No
NumberOne(422) Disputed
1 point

You are a retarded piece of fuck.

No sir, YOU are a retarded piece of fuck. You have taken this debate, which is an obvious parody and a troll, so seriously that you have actually become angry about it. I am laughing at you right now while I drink my hot beverage with a smug air of satisfaction that I will never, ever, be as stupid as you.

Side: Yes

Then it wouldn’t be sience. Something can’t not be itself. So, why is this statement being stated?

Side: No