CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
"Shithole countries"-Trump am glad Africa heard it for themselves
I always told them, they never believed me, i wish to invite many to come here to see all the racists on display, Antrim, Dermot and Co. I should bookmark/archive all the links to the racist topics and give them something good to read.
The only person i got respect for here is Minttea though we fight a lot on moral and religious basis.
Only last year you proclaimed Donald Trump was your hero now you do not like him because he correctly called some African countries shit- holes , how quickly your adoration has changed
To call a country like Zimbabwe , Chad or the Congo a shot - hole is correct , how would you label them ?
To call a country a shit - hole is not racist you idiot a country is not a race , also regarding your claim that I posted up “ racist debates “ prove it bet you cannot , why’s that ?
You are one of the sites biggest racists and a hypocrite as well , you claimed white people were pigs and white women worthy of rape , you also claimed Irish people were filth and blacks used them as prostitutes
But to say one is offended does not constitute an argument it’s used to shut down debate , I’m afraid it doesn’t work with me .
To call certain countries shit - holes is actually an honest and fair assessment of some of these dreadful countries , tell me how would you describe the Congo , Chad , Somalia , North Korea or Saudi Arabia ?
Also why do some countries my own included take in people from various countries as a humane gesture if they’re not shit - holes ?
I was replying to grapes because he seems to think that when the truth and someone's feelings are in contradiction we should ignore the truth to save the person's feelings.
Apologies Winston , I spied disputed and presumed it was directed at me , I should have known better as I mostly find what you have to say perfectly sensible and pertinent
I think its more the point that most Americans wouldn't be able to tell you were Zimbabwe, Chad or the Congo are on the map but yet have such pride as to even express an opinion on them - thats one issue. Another is merely that a head of state would damage international relations just because he feels he needs to express that opinion.
You say ....... Another is merely that a head of state would damage international relations just because he feels he needs to express that opinion............
How does one damage international relations by honestly expressing themselves ?
Fellow politicians and high ranking governmental officials know these countries are shit - holes but prefer to go along with the pretence that the opposite is true so no one gets upset or outraged
My country like many others is involved in exporting vast amounts of various products to Saudi Arabia yet will never condemn them for their despicable human rights abuses , this is obviously despicable behavior but there again we wouldn’t want to damage international relations would we ?
How does one damage international relations by honestly expressing themselves ?
Pretty easily. I would wager that most other heads of state think Trump is a complete idiot and that the country is in many ways a shit hole but but would never say it. If Mexico called the US a shit hole, you don't think it would affect how Mexico deals with them? Its just plain stupid.
Every country in the world has problems and no country is perfect but we are talking about countries that are recognized worldwide as hell -holes , you are now narrowing it down to personalities as in Trump and perceptions of him worldwide , I fail to see your point as the difference between a country and a personality is obvious .
So tell me why is it internationally acceptable to call North Korea a living helll as the majority of politicians do , but not any of the countries I cited ?
This is unfortunately the American attitude. We are NOT talking about what we say amongst a group of us talking about an outsider group. America should be doing business with countries like Haiti and should be welcoming people from there too.
So tell me why is it internationally acceptable to call North Korea a living helll as the majority of politicians do , but not any of the countries I cited ?
I have never heard any head of the state call North Korea a hellhole, apart from Trump. But it is slightly difference because we want to move the rhetoric towards potentially supporting military action against them. Why does Trump want conflict with Haiti? Because they are poor and a different colour to Americans.
Why should America be doing business with Haiti ? Why should America welcome its people ?
Dishonesty amongst heads of state is appalling North Korea had over a million people die in its famine and cowardly politicians and media types dance on eggshells not to cause “ offence “
You honestly think Trump wants conflict with Haiti because of their skin colour ?
By the way I’m not a fan of Trumps by any stretch but I like the fact that he calls a shit -hole exactly what it is
Seriously? Cotton, rice, clothing. Look up how many hundreds of millions (literally) of dollars worth of goods are imported to the US. You think a country that defines being "great" as having money exists in a bubble?
Why should America welcome its people ?
Why not? Why are they less useful than people from other countries? Because they're from a shithole country. THAT is what is racist.
You honestly think Trump wants conflict with Haiti because of their skin colour ?
No not really skin colour. It is more because he sees them as the dirty type of people. The shitty people.
The market is obviously not as attractive as you make out otherwise Haiti would be thriving , I never stated any country exists in a bubble
But the U S has people from most countries in the world of every shape colour and creed including Haitians , denying people entry to a country is nor racist
I don’t recall Trump calling them “ dirty “ or “ shitty “ but they certainly live in a shit - hole which cannot be denied
The market is obviously not as attractive as you make out otherwise Haiti would be thriving , I never stated any country exists in a bubble
I don't find it particularly attractive, I never claimed that it was. I was saying that they give the US a lot and deserve respect.
But the U S has people from most countries in the world of every shape colour and creed including Haitians , denying people entry to a country is nor racist
You think that denying people entry to the country based on them being from shit hole countries is a legitimate reason that isnt racist?
I don’t recall Trump calling them “ dirty “ or “ shitty “ but they certainly live in a shit - hole which cannot be denied
The quote is exactly what you are denying: "Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?" What is the quality he is assuming from people from shithole countries?
But many Haitians in the past were given entry also if Haiti is not a shit - hole why do they not want to live there ?
They are not being denied for being from a shit - hole any legitimate claims are catered for ........
recommendations received as part of an inter-agency consultation process, Acting Secretary Duke determined that those extraordinary but temporary conditions caused by the 2010 earthquake no longer exist," a statement from the Department of Homeland Security said. "Thus, under the applicable statute, the current TPS designation must be terminated."
According to DHS, the department can designate a country for Temporary Protected Status when it has been affected by "conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country's nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately."
This can include situations like civil wars or natural disasters. Individuals who are already in the United States from the designated countries are eligible and are then protected from deportation.
When their protected status expires, individuals living in the US under those protections will revert to the status they would have had otherwise or the status they applied for in the interim, meaning thousands could become undocumented overnight if they do not leave or qualify for residency another way.
According to Monday's announcement by DHS, "the termination of TPS for Haiti will be delayed 18 months," in order to ensure a smooth transition.
I’m denying nothing no one has called the people “ shitty “ or “ dirty “ but the reason they flee their country is because it’s a shit — hole
But many Haitians in the past were given entry also if Haiti is not a shit - hole why do they not want to live there
Whether it is actually a shithole (whatever that means) is not the issue. If it is a shithole - why do the majority of Haitians stay? (see: stupid question isnt it?).
If you don’t know what shit - hole means what are you arguing about ? If it’s not the issue what are you arguing about ?
Shithole is just a meaningless insult. Every Trump support is desperately scurrying around to find evidence of how poor countries could legitimately called "shitholes" when all Trump meant by it was to be insulting. Why are we letting these people from the twatty countries come? Why are we letting these people from the cockface countries come? Its clearly a racist statement. It is saying this massive group of hetrogenous people - they're all negative and they shouldnt be here.
I'm not a Trump supporter , no one is scurrying around looking for a reason to call a shit - hole exactly what it is and it's not " illegitimate " to do so
To call someone a twat or a cock face is a personal attack to state an obvious truth is not
If they are legally entitled to enter or stay in the U S it's not a problem if they are illegally there they're criminals from a shit -hole of a country
If they are illegal then they are criminals from a foreign country. If they are illegal from a country I hate (hatred of a whole country, and their people, can only ever be due to prejudice) then THEN are they a criminal from a shit hole country.
One can't read Graham's, Obama's, nor Trump's minds. And no liberal wants to unless it's Trump.
Shithole isn't a term used to describe a person. It's a term used to describe a place. That's how English works. Look up Haiti on google pictures. It's a hell hole. To say anything else is to just be full of crap.
You say ...... If they are illegal from a country I hate (hatred of a whole country, and their people, can only ever be due to prejudice) then THEN are they a criminal from a shit hole country.........
Whether you hate or love a country makes no difference to whether an immigrant is illegal
So hatred of North Korea is only due to “ prejudice “ , really ?
Haitians are indeed from a shit - hole do some research
To call someone a twat or a cock face is a personal attack to state an obvious truth is not
Of course it isnt. It isn't literal.. Trump isn't literally saying it is a hole full of shit. He is merely expressing his negative opinion on how he sees them. Twatty place would be just as meaningless.
Nonsense , you say ....... Twatty place would be just as meaningless....
That expression is indeed meaningless and was used by you as a red herring as the term “ twat “ is used to describe a person , shit - hole is used to describe a place
If Mexico called the US a shit hole, you don't think it would affect how Mexico deals with them?
Are you actually advocating relationships based on dishonesty and fiction?
The US and Mexico each have things of value to offer each other in trade. Likewise, the relationship between the two includes common borders and related security issues. That does not change the fact that any objective evaluation of each one by the other is to the advantage of each in shaping how they develop the relationship.
Moreover the comparative condition of each country is clearly shown by the immigration imbalance. Millions of Mexicans would rather live in the US than in Mexico, many of whom are willing to walk across miles of desert to get here. The same is not true of American desire to live in Mexico.
Carlos Mencia said on Mind of Mencia that "Mexico sucks" so bad that Mexicans who move from Mexico to Barstow, CA are happy to be in Barstow.
I have been to Barstow. It is a SHITHOLE, and for more reasons than the weather.
Think about what that says about Mexico.
The fact is that millions of Mexican immigrants voted by their choice of residence that Mexico is a shithole, and this is a basic factor in the relationship between the US and Mexico. This is both a cause and a result of the comparative wages in each country, and multiple aspects of US-Mexico trade relations.
It does nobody any good to pretend that horrible places are nicer than they actually are. In fact, the acknowledgement of exactly how bad each place actually is contributes honesty and reality to the relationship. Certainly it should inform whether or how the countries do business, and whether either would profit by immigration of unscreened people from the other.
Any of the following is sufficient to make a country so undesirable as a place to live that shithole is a fair moniker.
-Oppressive widespread poverty
-Unusable, dilapidated, or undeveloped infrastructure
-Chaotic or unstable political situations
-Violently oppressive governments
-Lack of commitment to human rights of the citizens
-Economic failure and dismal economic outlooks
-Lack of educational opportunities and widespread low education levels of citizenry
-Average national IQ less than 70 (which is counted as mentally retarded)
How can these issues not affect relations? Why would these sorts of problems be irrelevant to immigration policies, trade policies, and political relations?
Why are we letting all these people from Barstow live in other parts of the US?
We don't. It is surrounded by desert, and the liberals refuse to fund a wall; they say the natural barrier is enough. :)
You point out the difference between citizens and guests. Citizens have a right to be in a country because it is their country, and they may go wherever in the country they please. They may leave shitholes like Barstow, Mississippi, or Alabama, and go to Dallas, San Diego, or Honolulu, or wherever else they like.
By contrast, people from other countries have no right to go even to Barstow without permission. That permission should be contingent on evidence that those allowed into our country will improve it. That means that random people should not be allowed in just because they won a lottery, or have relatives here...
...even if they want to go to Barstow.
Too often, people forget that countries are the residents' homes. Lots of US foreign policy disasters are the direct result of the US government ignoring this particular reality.
Do you let random strangers move into your house?
Do you let anyone outside the people who live with you decide who may come into your house?
Do you not have some standards about who you let into your house?
Do you let a guest in your house stay longer than you want them to?
Do any of your guests have the right to go into any room in your home they want?
If a stranger knocked on your door and said their toilet was broken, and then asked to use your toilet, wouldn't you want some reason to believe that they were not going to do to your toilet whatever they had already done to their own?
Good questions. But, lemme ask you this. When Mexicans traveling north reached the border, did they see a do not cross sign, or did they see a help wanted sign?
But, lemme ask you this. When Mexicans traveling north reached the border, did they see a do not cross sign, or did they see a help wanted sign?
They see signs that the Border Patrol is trying to stop them. I think that counts as "do not cross."
They have to go further to get to the "help wanted if you will undercut citizens' wages" signs. Those are put up by the people who don't want to obey the law any more than the illegal immigrants do.
If they get to the outskirts of LA, San Francisco, or Chicago, the see signs that Democrat politicians put up that say, "lawbreakers welcome here if you will vote Democrat".
Regardless, they are greeted by bastards on all sides of the issue
-those who want them illegal, so they can cheat the economic system.
-those who want them legal, so they can cheat the political system.
Every Middle Eastern country refers to America as the Great Satan. Not particularly diplomatic would ya say? How about ol Kim Jong Un in N Korea? How do you feel about his diplomacy skills? Perhaps the leader of China? None would pass a liberal pc test, and you know it.
The only liar is you and your posts demonstrate clearly you are incapable of posting anything but nonsense , now back to your shit -hole of a country with you
Great countries such as the United States of America deserve to be described as such.
In the same context 'SHITHOLE COUNTRIES such as Mexico and most African nations should be accurately portrayed for what they are.
I didn't make the United States a great country nor did I make so many of the African states shitholes.
So why criticize the truthful authors for their candid accuracy?
Do fools such as you think that if we describe SHITHOLES such as Liberia as a prosperous and progressive country with one of the highest standards of living in the world that it would miraculously come to fit the description?
Wise up shithead and smell what it is you're trying to shovel.
We can't be described as a great nation. We elected a sociopath for president, care more about out military than education, and can't even agree with ourselves, let alone other countries.
Then there shouldn't be anyone from a shithole country more successful(business wealth made) than you are. Are there any? Can you confidently say there are none? If No, why? What is the your essence in life if shithole people are above you.
Trump is an idiot because his dad gave him a million to start business as a young boy back in the 1900's and so far he only made 3billion. If not for the million i believe his life will be a shit-truck today. There are many who started with zero and above him today even from shithole countries. Had trump been a country, he would have been worse than anyshithole in africa because he is an idiot who couldn't multiply resources well.
I dont think you really understand the point, he is calling those countries a shit hole because politically, economically thats what they are, we are talking about a national level not a personnal level.
If my calculator is correct he made a gain of about 300 000%, if that isnt multiplying resources then what is?
"There are many who started with zero and above him today even from shithole countries" well to be honest I dont know a single one, the only rich people from african countries I have heard about are the dictators who take 80% of the national taxes and tcheat during elections to get elected for life
So there are 7 african people richer than Trump... great, I suppose you knew it before you jumped unto google? Nope you didnt and ill tell you why: even though they are rich they still come from shit hole countries
You are correct Antrim success of any kind by a white person greatly upsets Jeffrey , also he failed to mention his own president who is a renowned swindler and charges people massive sums of money to sit in his company ........
The controversial $100,000 charge slapped on Chief Executives Officers (CEOs) of expatriate companies to sit on the same table with President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo at a dinner during the Ghana Millennium Excellence Awards has made it to the international news portals.
The matter which has generated a heated controversy among members of the New Patriotic Party and the National (NPP) Democratic Congress (NDC)
Ok to clear it up, the president had no idea of that and when he heard the rumour, he made sure a committee was set up to investigate the matter and interrogate his own party man; the organiser(a very wealthy man).
The committee found no truth in tbe accusation. The accuser is from an opposition party trying to paint the current government black. The accuser has received a lot of condemnation from the whole nation and can be sent to court for making up such s huge lie by the organiser. But he is a big wealthy man, that insect cannot even climb up even to the level of his window to bug him...
Nonsense , listen if your president is an admitted plagiarist as in below why would I believe you ?
The C E O ‘ s of state run countries are bleeding the country dry and are receiving massive salaries and bleeding your country dry why would your president be any different
JOHANNESBURG - In an embarrassing start to his new presidency, Ghana’s new head of State has apologised for plagiarism during his inaugural speech.
The office of Nana Akufo-Addo issued an apology on Sunday after he was accused of lifting passages from speeches by Bill Clinton and George W Bush during his inaugural address to the nation, Al Jazeera reported on Monday.
READ: Ghana president faces outcry over plagiarism in inaugural speech
Following his Saturday swearing-in-ceremony in the capital Accra, social media users started pointing out similarities between Akufo-Addo’s speech and those delivered by the two former US presidents.
“Though our challenges are fearsome, so are our strengths. Ghanaians have been a restless, questing, hopeful people. And we must bring to our task today the vision and will of those who came before us,” Akufo-Addo said.
It echoed Bill Clinton’s 1993 inauguration speech: “Though our challenges are fearsome, so are our strengths. And Americans have ever been a restless, questing, hopeful people. We must bring to our task today the vision and will of those who come before us.”
In another instance, Akufo-Addo said: “I ask you to be citizens: citizens, not spectators; citizens, not subjects; responsible citizens building your communities and our nation.”
What i know is he didn't type it, there are people in charge of that, if he had it on the day of his innuaguration, there was nothing he could do about it within that last hour whether he liked it or not or was his original or not.
A win in a competion of just two especially with a woman competitor for such a position is not any achievement, really. When last did America vote for a female president? uuhhhhhh? NEVER.
Everyone knows trump is an idiot. Read his lips which always gets him into trouble. You think a man who plays with nukes like a toy gun is not an idiot? wow, In an interview where he was asked about how to solve global warming and his solution was getting people more jobs. Wow he is really not an idiot.
Now he talks trash about a continent and all America ambassadors are being questioned what their superintelligent president really meant.
He is a stable Genius at being an idiot, be illuminied.
Not bitter, he is on display, am only reporting accurately.
If had 1million in 1900's as a young boy i would be a 1 trillonaire by 2025.
A win in a competion of just two especially with a woman competitor for such a position is not any achievement, really.
You do not live here, so I would not expect you to know: There were four main candidates for the Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, and Green parties, plus (depending on the state/district) several other parties' candidates.
The fact that Hillary (Democrat) and Stein (Green) were women made no difference. Both were weak candidates who did not propose clear and economically workable solutions to the nation's problems.
An experiment at New York University was intended to show that Hillary was disliked because of being a woman, but the experiment demonstrated the opposite.
If had 1million in 1900's as a young boy i would be a 1 trillonaire by 2025.
This is doubtful.
Creating that much wealth is harder than you think. Lots of people start out with millions, but never make it to be billionaires. Some even start with billions, but nobody has ever made it to trillionaire.
Moreover, making a million dollar investment yield a 300,000% return requires skill and careful planning and execution.
You are careless with your spelling (A win in a competion..., ...trillonaire..., and ...be illuminied...), capitalization (...toy gun is not an idiot? wow, In... and ...i would be ...), and punctuation (He is a stable Genius at being an idiot, be illuminied.)
I would expect the carelessness (as your language indicates) to hamper your success.
But a competition win is a win especially when it’s for possibly the most powerful position in the world , in fact its a major win
You adored Trump last month now he’s an idiot , Trump may be many things but he’s not an idiot .
You’re assuming you would be a trillionaire and of course you base this on nothing except an egotistical boast , it sounds to me like you’re merely jealous of how high an alleged “ idiot “ like Trump has climbed
If anything, we're a hole country. At times of piece, we're increasing our defense budget because we're paranoid. We let our president run rampant and insult countries undeserving of our hate.We, for some reason,use an absurd amount of energy. We have the third most people but use the most energy. And we ruined a country by sending back 200,000 people who will all need jobs (jobs that their country won't have).
Race has nothing to do with what Trump said, nor does it have anything to do with whether any particular country is a shithole.
Here are some general guidelines to whether your country is a shithole.
- If your country is so bad that, in order to get people to stay, the government has to shoot people who try to leave, then it is a shithole. (DPRK)
- If your country is so bad that people will fill boat after boat to overflowing, and risk drowning in order to leave, then it is a shithole. (Libya, Syria, Yemin, etc.)
- If genocide is happening in your country, then it is a shithole. (Myanmar)
- If your country is so bad that it can be described using the words "One of the poorest countries in... ," then it is a shithole. (Haiti, Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, Birundi etc.)
- If your country is so bad that a third of your citizens live in some other country, then it is a shithole. (El Salvador)
People keep twisting the argument by first twisting the truth.
Africa was the word trump used , he didn't mention specific countries in Africa. Africa is highly recognised for a particular race;Blacks, sooooo he is a racist.
When people hear Africa they think poverty, corruption, crime, and the constant overthrow of governments. Maybe you think of it in terms of race, but many people do not. BTW, the northern part of Africa has over 200 million people who are not black. That is a lot of people.
Africa is highly recognised for a particular race;Blacks, sooooo he is a racist.
Africa is not only known for Black people. It is also highly recognized for poverty, cleptocratic dictatorships, and political instability and violence.
Why would you pick the only one of the four that has nothing to do with making so many countries in Africa into shitholes?
Seriously, why do you think poverty has nothing to do with making a place awful?
Consider:
Of the 30 poorest nations (by per capita GDP in terms of buying power) 24 are African countries.
Only 5 African nations have per capita GDP above $15,000/year.
Only 11 African Countries are in the top 100 nations by per capita GDP.
Explain to me how the characterization of Africa as a shithole is an expression of racism, not the result of objectively measurable economic standards.
I like your honesty. Only uneducated minds will still deny.
It is also
Nice way to make your next/actual point.
Do you have any mental image of a shithole? you call a human settlement that? Who shits in that hole?You? Are you better/important/globally influential than every individual there?
Why do European/Asian/American companies seek customers there for their products to make money. If africa shoul block international trade/impiorts, do you know the damage it will do to foreign companies and countries as a whole. All raw materials can be grown in Africa.
Infact if africa stops exports the world will stop having tea and chocolate lol(a quip, but factual).…… Pray Africa never establishes all factories to refine all their natural resources. In other words pray africa remains a shithole
I have a set of criteria for being a shithole. Places that do not meet the following criteria are shitholes.
- Stable government
- No genocide
- No starvation
- Actual enforcement of laws against slavery
- Infrastructure that reaches at least 85% of the population. This includes roads, bridges, electrical grids, communication grids, water and sewage treatment, trash pickup and disposal, medical services (hospitals, etc.)
- Universal education system (Religious education does not count.)
- Economic self-sufficiency
Maybe I am wrong, but as far as I know, every single nation in Africa fails to meet no fewer than two of these criteria.
You tell me, how many of these criteria does Ghana meet?
+++
This is why Africa gets SO much international aid.
If a nation is not self-sufficient, and it is receives foreign aid on a regular basis, and still has starving people, places without medical care, fresh water, and no sewage treatment, then it is a shithole.
Every single nation in Africa has been receiving Official Development Assistance (ODA) from the DAC since prior to 1970. (This does not include private donations from NGOs, churches, Red Cross, etc., nor does it include aid given to nations for disaster relief.) The average annual Official Development Assistance (ODA) aid to Africa from 2010-2014 was $52.6 Billion.
The total ODA given to African nations since 1970 is $1.46 Trillion (NOT adjusted for inflation).
This data is from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report in 2016.
- Infrastructure that reaches at least 85% of the population. This includes roads, bridges, electrical grids, communication grids, water and sewage treatment, trash pickup and disposal, medical services (hospitals, etc.)
- Universal education system (Religious education does not count.)
- Economic self-sufficiency
Maybe I am wrong, but as far as I know, every single nation in Africa fails to meet no fewer than two of these criteria.
Bullshit, are you saying there are no genocides in USA, Europe, Russia and China? America should have the highest records in inland genocides, outland genocides in wars and attacking African personalities.
Are you saying there would not be found a single person starving in Asia, Europe, Russia and USA?
You are really dumb to think cartels and powerful people in other countries do not buy slaves.
Rich people across the whole world capture people for body parts like kidneys to replace their sick dying ones.
It even happens in China.
Wtf do you mean by stable government? Name an African country that had instability in the past that didn't have American or European hands secretly backing it.
Fuck your stupid economic self sufficiency when America takes advantage of wars in Africa to steal natural resources to support your economies. Where did Europe get all the wealth from? You were fucking broke.
You would starve to death exactly 100yrs after Africa becomes self sufficient just like after independence you lost easy access to stealing it's natural resources. That can easily happen if Africa begins to produce more instead of importing more because we don't require raw materials from any continent.
When you talk about international aid, you should realise that it has not changed the state of Africa in the slightest because the money stops flowing when it reaches the leaders, it doesn't reach the ordinary citizens and the ordinary citizens don't depend on aid. (You are only aiding African leaders to remain rich and (poor will remain poor) according that stupid thing you call GDP again) Which is a false economic stats indicator particularly for Africa because most micro businesses run by the ordinary citizens are not registered. Almost everyone i know has a source of income. People neither want to waste their money in taxes because they know it will not yield any results for them (as a country) because most of that money will just vanish into thin air and have no impact on society or their children. It's everyone for himself in Africard Fuck GDP stats
Jeffrey I think it’s about time you realized most African countries are indeed shitholes and cannot run themselves without foreign aid and even with that they’re still shitholes , stop blaming the white man we left your shores a long time ago and you’re still shitholes own it buddy
we left your shores a long time ago and you’re still shitholes own it buddy
You never left our shores because the Irish never were at our shores. Don't forget too soon the status of you's(Irish) back then; miserable and starving voluntary cheap slaves at the mercilessness of your fellow 'White' brothers. Just a reminder.
You never left our shores because the Irish never were at our shores.
Indeed , yet I can give you list after list of Irishmen you ran and controlled ships who’s cargo was slaves taken from your shores
Don't forget too soon the status of you's(Irish) back then; miserable and starving voluntary cheap slaves at the mercilessness of your fellow 'White' brothers. Just a reminder.
Yet look at the Irish now compared to Africans who still have the begging bowl out , make you proud does it buddy?
Indeed , yet I can give you list after list of Irishmen you ran and controlled ships who’s cargo was slaves taken from your shores
Not that am granting it's true but it all doesn't matter because slaves from Ghana weren't miserable voluntary slaves neither were they slaves conquered by foreigners but slaves conquered by fellow blacks in tribal wars and sold to the British. The British weren't so fierce to the Asantes(my tribe) because there was one time when one from our tribe called Asamante was a very friendly business trader with the British exchanging Gold or slaves for Fire Arms and one day after buying all the weapons, he and his army arrested all the British Army with their Governor and imprisoned them in the Christian burg castle for several months until they settled him with a ransom then he released them but keeping the keys of the castle and making them make new copies of keys. The British dominated because they stopped selling weapons to the Asantes after they thought they had enough gold. Even yet, the Asantes see themselves as the winners of the Wars because they were protecting 'The Golden Stool' which they believe holds the spirit of the tribe not the 16yrs old King Prempeh II who was taken into exile in Seychelles Island by the British to prevent him from succeeding in uniting the other Kings after the death of his predecessor and also making them recover from the state of shock the surprise attack of the British on their Capital effected on them(their city had never been penetrated before). He was a young king and wasn't influential yet. The stool was more important to them than the King who is easily replaceable and of which they succeeded to protect. So the Asantes were domineered due lack of sufficient fire arms because they had made war with their sole suppliers if not so, they had two examples of what they could have done if they were as equipped as the British.
While the Asantes were fighters, the Irish on the other hand voluntarily , desperately and miserably sold themselves into slavery to survive.😂😂😂😂🙈🙉
Your copy and pasted plagarised article is basically a long winded attempt to avoid answering what I really said as in .....Yet look at the Irish now compared to Africans who still have the begging bowl out , make you proud does it buddy?
I will make a deal with you ok I will prove it when you offer up proof for your god .... bet you cannot
But you cannot prove that God doesn't exist, what if we live inside a black hole connected to another universe where space and time don't exist and so everything happens at once which allowed for the spontaneous assembly of a superbeing beyond our space/time which created our finite and organized universe to help it make sense of reality.
The same way you cannot prove unicorns , ghosts or goblins don’t exist but I know what’s more probable as I’ve no reason to believe in any of the listed
If you believe in god does that include the countless gods that people around the world claim to exist if not why not ?
If you believe in them all why do so if as you state you’ve no proof for such?
I don't believe in anything, I especially I don't believe in things which have been proven wrong. And you have been proven wrong at least 384 times to be precise.
So how can one whom does not even exist, ever hope to win a debate?
Says the idiot with 71 alt accounts who famously wailed “ buh ,buh steel cannot melt “ and gets his sorry fat ass kicked by everyone on C D .... Remember when you claimed to be a journalist until fellow members tested you on your claims and you fled to an alt account 🙀👋😂😂😂😂😂
Jeffrey I think it’s about time you realized most African countries are indeed shitholes and cannot run themselves without foreign aid
Foreign "aid" is the reason most of them are shitholes in the first place you bone thick Irish twat. Are you really telling us you are naive enough to believe countries like America are charities? That isn't how it works, baboon brain. Foreign African governments are often bribed with vast amounts of money in the form of loans which the lenders know full well they will never be able to afford to pay back. Once they default on the loans these same lenders then arrive to acquisition the natural resources. You really are pig ignorant enough to believe it is just coincidence that the world's richest source of diamonds and precious metals is the poorest continent on Earth, aren't you? A typically ignorant, brainless paddy twat is what you are buddy.
Foreign "aid" is the reason most of them are shitholes in the first place you bone thick Irish twat.
Gibberish and typical nonsense yet again from Nom the brain dead Stalinist
Are you really telling us you are naive enough to believe countries like America are charities? That isn't how it works, baboon brain.
I haven’t a clue what you’re babbling about forget to take your meds again Dumbo?
Foreign African governments are often bribed with vast amounts of money in the form of loans which the lenders know full well they will never be able to afford to pay back. Once they default on the loans these same lenders then arrive to acquisition the natural resources. You really are pig ignorant enough to believe it is just coincidence that the world's richest source of diamonds and precious metals is the poorest continent on Earth, aren't you? A typically ignorant, brainless paddy twat is what you are buddy.
Nonsense , African blacks couldn’t organize a piss up in a brewery as they are mostly lazy work shy brutes who rely on welfare and foreign aid as a way of life rather like you claiming social welfare on account of your extreme retardation
Bullshit, are you saying there are no genocides in USA, Europe, Russia and China? America should have the highest records in inland genocides, outland genocides in wars and attacking African personalities.
I said no such thing. Every continent has many more than a few example of genocide in history. Make no mistake, I do not care what else is going on in the country, genocide turns it immediately into a shithole.
This includes the US, but this nation got past it. There has been no genocide in the US since the Indian wars that ended in the 1890's.
In addition to no genocide in the US, for over a century the US has also had:
- Stable government
- No starvation
- Actual enforcement of laws against slavery
- Infrastructure that reaches at least 85% of the population. This includes roads, bridges, electrical grids, communication grids, water and sewage treatment, trash pickup and disposal, medical services (hospitals, etc.)
- Universal education system (Religious education does not count.)
- Economic self-sufficiency
That is why so many people want to move here.
When you talk about international aid, you should realise that it has not changed the state of Africa in the slightest because the money stops flowing when it reaches the leaders, it doesn't reach the ordinary citizens
People neither want to waste their money in taxes because they know it will not yield any results for them (as a country) because most of that money will just vanish into thin air and have no impact on society or their children. It's everyone for himself in Africa
Having a government of the quality you yourself describe is a pretty solid argument that your government makes your country into a worse place to live than it would be. Infrastructure and universal education are the responsibility of government. If your government does not support those, then that is two of the criteria I listed that your nation fails to meet.
You would starve to death exactly 100yrs after Africa becomes self sufficient just like after independence you lost easy access to stealing it's natural resources.
How do you figure that the US would starve when Americans grow three times as much food as we consume?
When you lie through your teeth about American genocide, i get loss of appetite to continue talking. I piled some a lot of links to share but I got sick of this shit so I stopped. America almost wiped out North K this year. America wiped a lot Liberians with Ebola virus since they couldn't throw a nuclear missile like they did to Japan. That moron who killed 30people , injured 500 and finally killed himself was American, America killing 400 Syrians a day happened in 21st century, America has been behind so many genocides that favoured it's political agenda. America sits it's ass on great burning red debts including 1.2trillion to China in Treasury bills but keeping a comfortable face. You talk about some stupid aids to gain influence in new African governments with conditions from IMF such as limiting the levelbof employment and reductions in salaries. Foolish hypocrites. Everything America projects in the media is fake. Everything is a cover up. America steals natural resources/minerals, politics is deadly in America, the CIA kills on rampage. 9/11 you recently had a memorial of and I saw in the news being blamed on terrorists of Bin laden's group another stupid story. Don't tell me any shit about stable government. Because there is no democracy in American governance, the vision of America is preplanned by it's forefathers and every one occupying office must abide by it or removed from office; you have a stable vision not government.
There is nothing like economic self sufficiency, if you are self sufficient, why do you need raw materials to produce in your country? Without production you can't make money and without Africa you can't produce so you are not self sufficient economically. There are people on the streets of America begging day and night even in Hollywood don't be stupid. Where is slavery going on in Africa?
While Africans move to America, they move to other countries as well; in Africa, Asia, Russia, Europe and there are Americans also here schooling and doing business what's the big deal? Wtf is ya problem with that?
Regarding genocide, you wrote, The public record of violent deaths following the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Documented civilian deaths from violence: 182,078 – 204,334.
You do understand there is a sharp and clear distinction between war and genocide, don't you?
" the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group"
-Merriam Webster Dictionary
Note that the genocide is characterized by the pointed and purposeful ("deliberate and systematic") destruction of some cohesive group. This is distinct from the mass death that results from the chaos of war and the wanton destruction of the landscape, including any people who happen to be there.
- Infrastructure that reaches at least 85% of the population. This includes roads, bridges, electrical grids, communication grids, water and sewage treatment, trash pickup and disposal, medical services (hospitals, etc.)
- Universal education system (Religious education does not count.)
- Economic self-sufficiency
Maybe I am wrong, but as far as I know, every single nation in Africa fails to meet no fewer than two of these criteria.
Bullshit, are you saying there are no genocides in USA, Europe, Russia and China? America should have the highest records in inland genocides, outland genocides in wars and attacking African personalities.
Are you saying there would not be found a single person starving in Asia, Europe, Russia and USA?
You are really dumb to think cartels and powerful people in other countries do not buy slaves.
Rich people across the whole world capture people for body parts like kidneys to replace their sick dying ones.
It even happens in China.
Wtf do you mean by stable government? Name an African country that had instability in the past that didn't have American or European hands secretly backing it.
Fuck your stupid economic self sufficiency when America takes advantage of wars in Africa to steal natural resources to support your economies. Where did Europe get all the wealth from? You were fucking broke.
You would starve to death exactly 100yrs after Africa becomes self sufficient just like after independence you lost easy access to stealing it's natural resources. That can easily happen if Africa begins to produce more instead of importing more because we don't require raw materials from any continent.
When you talk about international aid, you should realise that it has not changed the state of Africa in the slightest because the money stops flowing when it reaches the leaders, it doesn't reach the ordinary citizens and the ordinary citizens don't depend on aid. (You are only aiding African leaders to remain rich and (poor will remain poor) according that stupid thing you call GDP again) Which is a false economic stats indicator particularly for Africa because most micro businesses run by the ordinary citizens are not registered. Almost everyone i know has a source of income. People neither want to waste their money in taxes because they know it will not yield any results for them (as a country) because most of that money will just vanish into thin air and have no impact on society or their children. It's everyone for himself in Africard Fuck GDP stats
It's not racist to call a continent or country a shithole. It's a crude way of expressing that there are serious issues in that country/continent, be it with human rights, sanitation, access to education etc.
There are youtube compelations of Democrats, Republicans and news personalities using the same and similar language. Lyndsey Graham called them hell holes in one speech 5 times.
To be clear, people in the room say it wasn't said, and Durbin is a known fabricator even according to Democrats.
Almost all of africa is a shitty penis vagina hole. Everyone in africa has either killed a hundred people or died of malaria before they had a chance to kill people.
