CreateDebate


Debate Info

7
4
Yes, it should be allowed... No, it shouldn't be allowed..
Debate Score:11
Arguments:11
Total Votes:12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, it should be allowed... (5)
 
 No, it shouldn't be allowed.. (3)

Debate Creator

josh7579(5) pic



Should Animal Testing Be Allowed?

Animal testing allows products such as make-up and medicine to be tested without harming humans, however, it also causes animals to have pain, or death.

Yes, it should be allowed...

Side Score: 7
VS.

No, it shouldn't be allowed..

Side Score: 4
2 points

It is reasonable for animals to be used in the testing of medicines including life saving and pain relieving drugs, but not cosmetics nor any other product associated with the vanity industry.

Side: Yes, it should be allowed...
2 points

Another rare instance in which I agree with you completely.

Side: Yes, it should be allowed...

Animal testing is no longer needed. A supercomputer can give the results of the drug or product at hand. A super computer can simulate to the very atom how a nuclear bomb would explode on any given target, if the supercomputer can do that and can control millions and millions of devices all at once they can simulate the human body and a animal's body effects of a drug.

Animal testing is inhuman and should be illegal. But PETA does not seem to care enough as they have not shutdown animal testing.

Side: No, it shouldn't be allowed..
-Yuri-(284) Disputed
1 point

Please go site your sources to make anything you have just argued mean anything. otherwise your entire argument here is invalid.

Side: Yes, it should be allowed...
1 point

Basic knowledge if any government super computer tells you their is nuclear war simulations. Basic and more advanced super computer programming can get you a computer powerful enough to run a dialysis and test on a virtual human body.

Watson being used in the medical field.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_(computer) )

Super computers use to show and give predication and amount of disasters caused by nuclear warfare.

http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-11/advanced-supercomputer-models-supplant-nuclear-weapons-tests-are-they-accurate

This net source is saying it is not currently possible, But you of course would not understand that unless someone told you. When they invent and build a smaller microprocessor that runs less electricity than they will be able to make a computer powerful enough to give the structure of the entire human and animal body. This super computer mentioned does not have the power to run as fast as it is needed but if time is given than they computer would be able to diagnose and give a structured and detailed info on how that drug could effect the body. If you where to do testing on the current super computer you would get info and data but you would miss things and the computer would not give everything.

https://speakingofresearch.com/extremism-undone/alternatives/

Side: No, it shouldn't be allowed..
1 point

yea so now list your claim what does everything you have said prove?

Side: No, it shouldn't be allowed..