CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:38
Arguments:34
Total Votes:53
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Should Iraq or Kuwait be blamed for the Gulf War? (32)

Debate Creator

stan701(67) pic



Should Iraq or Kuwait be blamed for the Gulf War?

Add New Argument
2 points

Kuwait was the be blamed for the Gulf war, and is especially the cause of economic reasons resulting in the invasion of Kuwait.

Kuwait was unwilling to waive the debts that Iraq had borrowed from the Iraq-Iran war. Before the Iraq-Kuwait conflict took place, Iraq had a war with Iran, fighting against the Iranian government ideology that wanted the Middle East to be a Muslim region. During this war, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait had lent Iraq money for them to fight Iran. However, after the war ended, Iraq was left with a devastated economy. Originally, Kuwait refused to waive the war debt Iraq had taken from them, which left Iraq's economy in a poor state. Although they did waive the debts later on, Iraq's economy was so poor then that Iraq had to turn to the invasion of Kuwait in order to gain resources to sustain her economy. Hence, Kuwait was to be blamed for the conflict as Kuwait had originally refused to waive off the debts Iraq had taken for the Iraq-Iran war.

1 point

the inability to pay off debts do not justify the invasion of Kuwait and the insidious genocide of it's people that happened then after. And it also just not justify how Saddam did show intentions to launch and attack on Saudi Arabia by massing troops and tanks on the southern border of Kuwait and setting up 3 lines of defences. The armour on the south, more troops around Kuwait City and also the last line of defence - The Iraqi Republican Guard; Saddam Hussein's elite force.

Nobody should be given the right to kill another because he slapped him.

1 point

I agree. Kuwait had a legitimate excuse to feel reluctant in waiving Iraq's wartime debt, as the total sum they had lent to Iraq amounted to millions. Let's say for example that Kuwait and Iraq had been represented by you and your friend respectively. You lend your friend $10,000. He then spends it and gets into debt. Then he tries to accuse you of stealing money from him in an attempt to get some quick cash. Of course, you would feel insulted and you would not want to waive his debt to you. Of course, in the end you do, but then he starts bullying you. That is probably how Kuwait feels.

pasakorn(23) Disputed
1 point

First of all, there was no "inability" to pay off debts. Kuwait had sufficient resources to waive off the debts.

One of the reasons that Saddam Hussein claimed while invading Kuwait was the poor economy of Iraq that was propagated by Kuwait due to two reasons: Kuwait's refusal to abide by OPEC regulations, and Kuwait's refusal to waive off the war debts. You are right to say that an impoverished economy does not directly give Hussein reasons to attack Kuwait, but it is one of the factors which drove him into a corner so much that he had to invade other countries for resources.

Do also take note that the motion is about the causes of the Gulf War and not the consequences resulting from Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The mistreatment of Kuwaiti and Saudi Arabian civilians is a consequence and is not directly related to what originally caused the invasion in the first place.

1 point

Blaming-IRAQ

Iraq's intent on invading Kuwait was to gain resources for its own benefits. After the 8 year Iran-Iraq war, Iraq's economy was suffering. Also, since Iraq was landlocked, they had very little resources. Sadam Hussein then resorted to invasion of other countries to gain resources. By invading Kuwait, Sadam could gain wealth and natural resources to solve its financial problems. Hence, Iraq was to be blamed for the Gulf war as they themselves wanted the resources from Kuwait to begin with.

1 point

Iraq should be blamed for the Gulf war. Iraq's economy was getting worse after the war with Iran and the war plunged Iraq into a deep financial crisis and debt which Saddam could not pay off. Since the sum was up to 400 billion, Saddam invaded Kuwait as Kuwait was full of resources and it was rich.

Saddam also wanted to lift his own national prestige by showing that he was a liberator. So he wanted to capture Kuwait so he could get funds to pay off the war debt and fund the reconstruction programme that he promised the Iraqi's after the war against Iran.

argh_booo(1) Clarified
1 point

Was that really why Iraq invaded Kuwait? What were the other reasons that Iraq had to go into war with Kuwait?

1 point

I feel that Kuwait was to be blamed although Iraq was the main aggressor.

Kuwait knew that Iraq was war-torn economically and yet over-produced oil (defying OPEC regulations). This made Iraq lose billions of dollars through their only marketable resource, oil.

Also, Kuwait wanted more land despite them committing to such acts. This led to increasing tension between Iraq and Kuwait. Sure enough, the Iraqis became paranoid too and blamed Kuwait for taking their oil in the Rumalia oil field through slant drilling.

Thus, Kuwait caused major tension between Iraq and Kuwait before the Gulf War actually began.

pasakorn(23) Disputed
0 points

Are you exactly sure that Kuwait "wanted more land"? Weren't the two islands and Rumaila oil fields originally Kuwait's in the first place?

argh_booo(1) Disputed
1 point

http://www.ontheissues.org/images/iraq_Map.gif Won't Kuwait want more land comparatively to the countries around it? It's so small in comparison!

1 point

IRAQ WAS TO BLAME.

During the beginning of the invasion of Kuwait, Saddam advanced aggressively towards the Southern Border between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia with a large number of troops and tanks massing around the area. Hence this was way beyond Saddam's alleged claims of it being a personal confliction between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia but a bid to take over at least 50% of the world's oil supply and control over the region because Kuwait and Saudi Araba had small armies.

THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL gave SADDAM HUSSEIN a DEADLINE to WITHDRAW in 6 WEEKS, but he ignored it. Although he showed no signs of attack, he showed no interest to WITHDRAW. The world lost their patience while looking at Iraq unrightfully taking over Kuwait and conducting public executions and torturing it's people as it became common.

1 point

Iraq was to blame as it provoked Kuwait by refusing to recognize Kuwait's Independence and claimed that Kuwait was a part of Iraq. Iraq also accused Kuwait of stealing oil from the side which Iraqis claimed to be theirs and demanded compensation. Saddam Hussian also claimed that the Kuwaiti revolutionaries had written letter to him, seeking his help to overthrow the government. Saddam also latter ordered the troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border and postponed the negotiation talks.

1 point

Iraq should be blamed as they were unable to solve the disputes between them and Kuwait through reasoning instead of fighting.

pasakorn(23) Disputed
1 point

If that is the case, shouldn't you blame international peace keeping organisation such as Arab League or UN for failing to resolve this issue?

Padme01(17) Disputed
1 point

If two parties get into a fight, usually the aggressor would be the one who started the fight, and he should be blamed and punished accordingly. The Arab League or the UN could be blamed for turning their backs if they had simply ignored the fighting. However, they had actually tried to help. The fact that they tried to help shows that they had indeed tried to resolved the issue but it is not possible for them to always succeed. They tried, that is what matters.

1 point

Iraq was to blame as Saddam Hussein who was desperate to save Iraq's economy and decided to invade Kuwait. Iraq's economy was suffering after their war with Iran and Saddam Hussein already had a large army as well as angry people who were unhappy with the rise in prices due to the economy. Saddam Hussein thus fearing the army would turn on him decided to invade Kuwait. As Iraq was the one who took the offense first it was to blame.

1 point

Kuwait is to blame.

In 1990, Kuwait breached the OPEC quota of production, keeping the prices of oil low, resulting in Iraq to lose revenue from selling oil, unable to repay debt to Kuwait

1 point

I feel that Kuwait was to blame. Kuwait, along with the UAE ignored OPEC quotas and produced oil above their assigned limits. This caused the oil prices to fall from US$18 to US$7 per barrel and because of this, Iraq-who had fought against Iran on behalf of it's neighbours and thus was in severe debt from war-lost a lot of revenue (US$1 billion from oil sales each time the prices of oil fell by US$1). Hence Kuwait was not exactly the most cooperative and helpful neighbour, thus aggravating Iraq. Kuwait knew that 90% of Iraq's income came from the sales of oil and hence Kuwait's actions were equivalent to economic warfare.

mirz97 Disputed
1 point

After the July 1990 Mediation by the Arab League, Kuwait had agreed to revert back to proper OPEC quotas. This shows that Kuwait was reasonable and would settle its disputes in a peaceful manner. This is compared to Iraq's way of aggression by stationing Iraqi soldiers at the border of Kuwait. In addition to that, Iraq postponed these peace talks as well as started the invasion of Kuwait. Thus, although Kuwait was blamed for ignoring OPEC for a short period, Iraq was the one who "triggered" the war.

1 point

Iraq was to blame.

Iraq accused Kuwait of using slant drilling technology to steal oil from Iraq's side of the Rumalia oilfield, and made unreasonable demands to Kuwait by demanding Kuwait to stop drilling from the oilfield immediately, and US$2.4 billion as compensation.

Iraq also attempted to take the Warbah and Bubiyah islands from Kuwait by force from the 1960s to the 1970s, which is as good as invading and trying to take over Kuwait's territory.

Iraq also started the aggression against Kuwait by sending their troops to invade Kuwait even after Kuwait wrote of Iraq's previous debt and loaned them another US$500 million.

pasakorn(23) Disputed
1 point

It should be noted that Kuwait waived the debts an extremely long time after the Iraq-Iran war. Iraq's economy was already devastated at the time.

1 point

Iraq was to be blamed. During the period before the Gulf War, Iraq and Kuwait actually met to attempt to solve the problems during the Arab League Talks (July 1990) However, Iraq was seen to be unwilling to negotiate. This is evident as Iraq had been delaying and postponing negotiations.Iraq started to station Iraqi troops at the border of Kuwait which Kuwait dismissed as a bluff. After that, Iraq then attacked Kuwait a day before the supposed negotiation. This shows that Iraq had initiated the war towards Kuwait using aggression despite peaceful means being implemented, showing the direct cause of the Gulf War.

1 point

Kuwait was to blame as they did not help out Iraq withs it's problems and caused Iraq to suffer in its economy by decrising the price of oil by overproducing it more than OPEC's oil quotas. With Kuwait causing Iraq to face eonomic warfare by attacking its economy by overproducing oil, Iraq was forced to attack and thus Kuwait was to blame for attacking Iraq's economy first.

1 point

Iraq was to be blamed for the Gulf war as, when they were in financial trouble, they did everything they could to try to accuse Kuwait of stealing from them, so that they could get money. Iraq also invaded Kuwait before they had even finished the debate on peace-making. Saddam Hussein was impatient and greedy, trying to make as much money as possible. They also attacked Kuwait, even after Kuwait had written off their wartime-debt, which actually was not an obligation of Kuwait.

1 point

Kuwait should be blamed for the war as they worsened Iraq's financial situation after Iran-Iraq war by selling more oil, causing oil prices to drop. This could be the reason why Iraq's economy suffered so badly after the war, causing them to resort to other means to help restore their economy such as invading resource rich Kuwait.

0 points

Iraq should be blamed. They initiated the conflict. They took military action without confiding with the other nations in the Arab league.

stalin(2) Disputed
2 points

Does initiating the conflict warrant being blamed for the gulf war? Were there other factors that would have lead up tithe conflict?

-1 points

Iraq was to blame.

The middle wastern community felt that Saddam's invasion should be dealt in arab context instead of the western. Saudi Arabia hence submitted a proposal for Iraq to withdraw peacefully and still acclaim victory. Kuwait also had to gave away 2 islands to Iraq that were blocking their limited access to sea areas. However, Saddam himself wanted to gain something for this deal and refused to spare an attack on Kuwait. Thus it is evidently quite clear that Saddam was to blame.

wenkai31(4) Clarified
1 point

It should be Middle Eastern in the first sentence... last sentence; Saddam was technically the one to blame but as a result of his greed, Iraq was ultimately blamed.

-1 points

I feel that Kuwait was to blame as it is not willing to help Iraq. Kuwait initially did not want to erase Iraq's debts but finally unwillingly did it as other countries pressurized it to do so.

Padme01(17) Disputed
1 point

That is true, but before the war, Kuwait did lend a large sum of money to Iraq and it is not easy for them to agree to erase Iraq's debt when millions of dollars were involved. Kuwait may also have felt hostile towards Iraq as, after they had lent Iraq millions to help them in the war, Iraq threatened them, accused them of stealing from the Rumaila oilfield and challenged them in their sovereignty over the Warbah and Bubiyan islands.