CreateDebate


Debate Info

12
23
Yes No
Debate Score:35
Arguments:29
Total Votes:39
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (10)
 
 No (17)

Debate Creator

JustACorrect(20) pic



Should Religious Organizations Be Forced To Support Gay Marriage Cakes?

Yes

Side Score: 12
VS.

No

Side Score: 23
No arguments found. Add one!

No, but "support" is a loaded word. They should be forced to adhere to anti-discrimination laws, that require they serve the public. They should not be forced to "support" anyone (i.e. discounts, subsidies, free goods or service).

Side: No
3 points

no but they should be forced to do their jobs properly.

Side: No
2 points

No. People do not have to support same sex marriage. They have the right to oppose it, but they have no right to force that belief on other people. Freedom of belief is not the right to force that belief on other people. If you don't like same sex marriage, don't marry the same sex. It is really stupid the way conservative fanatics equate equalit with religious persecution. Gays wanting equal rights does NOT equal religious persecution! The antigay position is a religious idea that should not dictate the law. Furthermore, many Christians like myself support gay and bisexual rights.

Proof: http://www.gaychristian101.com/

Side: No
Atrag(5666) Disputed
2 points

hey have the right to oppose it, but they have no right to force that belief on other people

How do they oppose it without 'forcing their belief'?

Side: Yes
1 point

I will give you an example: In 2012, I voted to make same sex marriage legal. I was personally opposed to it, but did not wish to force religion on people. I am willing to vote against my own beliefs for an effective leader.

Side: Yes
1 point

Oh fuck! I meant to say that people do not have the right to OPPOSE same sex marriage. I am so progay.

Side: No
0 points

Of course people have the right to oppose same-sex marriage. I personally don't believe they have the right to try to push that opposition into law (at least without a substantial change to our Constitution), but you can not outlaw belief.

Side: Yes
1 point

If such an act would contravene the teachings of the baker's religion, then they most definitely should not be required by law to do so. The basic human right to be able to freely, and without fear of institutionalised persecution, to exercise one's religion is as equally important as the rights of those with deviant sexual orientations. In a number of instances, such as the ''Asher's Bakery'' case in Belfast, a gay couple willfully targeted a Christian owned establishment in the full knowledge that either their whole order, or part thereof would be refused, thus providing them with the grounds to commence litigation under the 'equality laws''. The mischievous gay trouble makers could have had their cake baked by the Christian bakery, (which the bakery did), and then had their gay message carried out by another party. Or, as normal and sensible people would have done, have someone else bake and decorate the cake.

Side: No

definitely not,they cannot be biased and cant be forced to support only one category or class as you say,it would lead to a heck of problems in case they are forced to advocate.

Side: No
1 point

Why should they?

Side: No
0 points

Should a baker be forced to serve an adultery and incest cake? :)

Side: No
Sitar(3680) Disputed
1 point

Gay and bisexual rights do not lead to those things. .

Side: Yes