CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
4
Yes No
Debate Score:8
Arguments:7
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (3)
 
 No (4)

Debate Creator

HappyCat(61) pic



Should a party that supresses speech, demands masks and locks down businesses

Should a party that supresses speech, demands masks, locks down businesses and panders to the mass murdering regime in China be calling anyone tyrants, Hitler or Nazis?

Yes

Side Score: 4
VS.

No

Side Score: 4
1 point

Should a party that supresses speech, demands masks and locks down businesses

Hello H:

We've discussed straw men before.. I guess you were out that day. If you wanna HAVE an intelligent argument, you CAN'T start it off with a straw man.. You just can't..

Here's what the dictionary says about straw men. You know what a dictionary is, right??

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=strawman

noun: straw man

1. an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

2. a person regarded as having no substance or integrity.

So, whadya want? Door number 1, or door number 2??

excon

Side: Yes
TigerPaws(18) Disputed
1 point

We've discussed straw men before.. I guess you were out that day. If you wanna HAVE an intelligent argument, you CAN'T start it off with a straw man.. You just can't..

Here's what the dictionary says about straw men. You know what a dictionary is, right??

It would only be a strawman if the left wasn't suppressing speech, wasn't demanding masks and wasn't shutting down businesses.

1)I'll assume you are mentally handicapped and give you the benefit of the doubt.

2)You ignored the point because you have no defense of your psychopathic political religion or the Hitlerian things it does.

Side: No
BigOats(1403) Disputed
1 point

an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument

1. What argument are you referring to ?

2. Which intentionally misrepresented proposition are you referring to?

Side: No
excon(15622) Disputed
1 point

1. What argument are you referring to ?

Hello Big:

Uh, THIS one: Should a party that supresses speech, demands masks and locks down businesses

I wasn't trying to trick you.. I get that you may not think it's a straw man.. Can't help that.. A straw man is the words and how they're put together that makes it a straw man.. The most famous one is, when did you stop beating your wife?

You get it, right?

excon

Side: Yes
1 point

Suppression of free speech is a standard DImocrat underhand political tactic aimed at reducing opposition rhetoric .

Demands for masks is a legitimate anti-covid-19 measure which has been scientifically proven to reduce the spread of the Chinese disease.

Business lockdowns are, unfortunately a necessary evil for everyone.

Lockdowns will sow the seeds of business failures causing unemployment and reducing tax revenue for the government. But they are deemed worldwide to be an effective weapon in the war against covid-19.

It's a fine balance between saving lives and killing off sections of the economy.

THANKS CHINA, COVID-19 HAS BEEN ONE OF YOUR BIGGEST EXPORTS AND ANTI-WESTERN SUCCESSES.

Side: Yes
1 point

Now almost everyone believes that Technology is Molding the Future of Education (info https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/technology-is-molding-the-future-of-education/ ) because a lot depends on them, in general, technology is a broad term that is useful as for me

Side: No