CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
4
NO! Yes!
Debate Score:10
Arguments:10
Total Votes:10
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 NO! (6)
 
 Yes! (3)

Debate Creator

almasbake(24) pic



Should countries have or develop nuclear weapons technologies?

Nowdays many countries refuse having and developing nuclear weapons, however there are countries which do not mind having a nuclear bomb in their arsenals, so which of them made good decision?! Is it good or bad?! Should we have nuclear weapons?!

NO!

Side Score: 6
VS.

Yes!

Side Score: 4

Nuclear Technology is a must if you wish to achieve the breakthrough in science.

But to prosper it only for the sake of weapons...thats just sad

Side: NO!
GuitarGuy(6096) Disputed
1 point

Then you're obviously on the wrong side...

Side: NO!
Centifolia(1319) Clarified
1 point

Thanks

Side: NO!
1 point

Nuclear weapons are only relevant to have if:

1) You want to be the ruler of the world, or

2) Somebody else has them.

I don't think either of these are justifiable.

Side: NO!
1 point

Nuclear weapons are reprehensible and cannot be justified they are the only weapons capable of destroying the human race.The threat or use of nuclear weapons is illegal according to a ruling by the international court in 1996.

Side: NO!
1 point

Should they have to? No. Do they need to? Not really, but a few countries do have a nuclear arsenal that if used on a weaker country would be devastating. It might be safe to have them as a sort of deterrent.

Side: NO!

Get rid of all nuclear weapons. Humanity will one day be destroyed if something is not done.

Side: NO!
2 points

In my point of view countries should have nuclear weapons. And I have some reasons why. First of all its just political power that should have every country to be sure and to protect their future. We do not know when the next war will begin it could begin now or tomorrow(God forbid!) and the nuclear weapons is only way to solve such cases without bloodshed. I think every head of the country is enough smart and won’t risk his nation and country to start and to be responsible for beginnig of nuclear war. If the country has its own weapon other countries will knew that this country is protected, and its people will be confident for a bright future. So I think the nuclear weapons is some kind of insurance! For example USA bombed Hiroshima and Japan wasn’t ready for this and such danger threatens for those countries which haven’t it’s own nuclear weapon. The another reason is a war for resources. I suppose that the next war will be for resources. And the country which hasn’t nuclear weapon can easily be a victim! Actually I'm completely against having a nuclear, but unfortunately it's a necessary thing in our times!

Side: Yes!

Of course. If a highly deadly, higly contagious, uncureable disease starts to become widespread, inflicting life at an alarming rate, then them thur nuklyar weapunz, would be perfect to use if the disease takes over an enormous area.

boooom! disease gone. k thx bai bai.

Side: Yes!
1 point

Nuclear weapons should be developed but solely for defensive purposes if someone else has nukes you need to be able to ensure MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) as soon as possible to ensure peace. At this point developing nuclear weapons is the only way to prevent them from being used.

Side: Yes!