CreateDebate


Debate Info

7
8
Yes. No.
Debate Score:15
Arguments:10
Total Votes:19
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. (6)
 
 No. (6)

Debate Creator

Redeemed(1428) pic



Should guns be banned?

Yes.

Side Score: 7
VS.

No.

Side Score: 8
2 points

In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.

So you tell me with each child dying from a drunk driver, why the Left is not all over the media pretending to be outraged over these innocent children's deaths? Do you have any idea how many more children are killed by drunk drivers than by guns in schools?

Where is the outrage and demand for alcohol regulations and back ground checks in public bars, nightclubs, etc.

If the real reasons for more gun control legislation is to save lives, why won't the Left propose laws mandating back ground checks in public places that sell alcohol to possible repeat DWI offenders?

I don't want this, but if your goal is to save lives with all your anti Gun rhetoric, you should be over joyed to save many thousands more lives by having background checks on people before buying alcohol in public places.

Do you have any idea how many times repeat DWI drivers continue to drink and drive? Approximately 40% of drunk drivers are repeat offenders! They drive even when their licenses are revoked!

The only way to prevent this is to do a background check before they buy that weapon of death.....ALCOHOL!

Wait, what you say? You say you don't want to be inconvenienced by background checks when buying alcohol? You say you are a law abiding citizen who would never drink and drive?

You say you don't want to pay more for alcohol to pay for those background checks for past DWI drivers?

I THOUGHT YOUR GOAL WAS TO SAVE LIVES? You expect law abiding citizens to pay more and put up with all the inconvenience from your anti gun legislation, but when it comes to your alcohol...... HANDS OFF?

A drunk driver behind the wheels of a car happens millions of times more often than some lunatic with a gun! The odds of you or your loved one being killed by a drunk driver is far higher than the odds of being shot at a concert or Church.

You are hypocrites and total jokes. You prove you could not care less about saving lives. You final goal is to take our guns.

You always spew your ludicrous reasoning why only guns should be singled out to save lives. A police state is just fine as long as it only controls one particular weapon of death..... the gun.

You say we already have alcohol restrictions? Yes, and we already have gun restrictions. You can't buy a gun under age, the same as alcohol. We can't shoot people, you can't hunt near public places and you can not drink and drive. BUT PEOPLE STILL DO IT!

IT'S NOT THE WEAPON OF CHOICE, BUT THE PERSON BEHIND THAT WEAPON. Use the brain God gave you and start addressing why people grow up to be criminals, or become irresponsible drinkers who have no problem drinking and driving.

Start addressing the core problem instead of their weapon of choice.

Side: Yes.
1 point

I'm on your side. I am Republican on guns.....................................................................................................................................................................

Side: Yes.
1 point

Everything should be banned and then the American Left will have a jail cell for their political opponents !!!!!!!!! Leftist are into 3rd world tyranny !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Yes.
1 point

No not at all , only a lunatic would suggest making a society more peaceful, the U S is sitting proudly at 121 first place in world peace rankings. My dreadful country is in 10th spot rating as a peaceful society , to solve this shameful situation we need to introduce guns into our society so we can compete effectively with the U S .

The U S A has a ranking of 121, just above Myanmar and well below Honduras, El Salvador, Rwanda, and Burkina Faso .....Oh dear

Side: No.
1 point

If guns were banned, how would the military fight? How would Police apprehend armed suspects?

Side: No.
1 point

Democratic Party Fairy dust. Duh...

Side: Yes.
0 points

People have the right to defend themselves. My body, my choice, libtards....................................................................................

Side: No.
Nom_Chomsky(846) Disputed
0 points

People have the right to defend themselves.

What the fuck does that statement have to do with guns you stupid cow?

People have the right to defend themselves. Therefore here's a tank?

You're an idiot. Fact.

Side: Yes.
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
2 points

Hay you Pond Dweller are you saying i do not have the right to protect myself in my own space ?????????????

Side: No.