CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
10
Should Should not
Debate Score:21
Arguments:21
Total Votes:22
Ended:02/24/12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Should (10)
 
 Should not (10)

Debate Creator

20110549(18) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Should human beings be allowed to use other animals as objects of sport and entertainment?

Should

Side Score: 11
Winning Side!
VS.

Should not

Side Score: 10
2 points

From my opinion, people may use animals as objects of sport & entertainment. You may ask why?

Because we are dominants over the animals in the world, however it does not give us any right to make it cruel, i think it can be used only as entertainment.

Also we can use animals to achieve some good results in sport, can't we? I guess it is good way to train using them.

I know some games like soccer, where people use animals and it does not cause them any negative effects.

That's why, i agree with the topic.

Side: Should
20110549(18) Disputed
1 point

Oh you tell me something about sport, I will tell you about the horse- and dog-racing.The welfare of the animals involved is at best a secondary concern. Horses are frequently injured and die in horse races, especially races over hurdles such as the infamous British 'Grand National'; they are also blinkered and whipped to make them run faster. It is unconvincing to claim that the animals can enjoy being subjected to this. As for the conditions the animals are kept in, these may be good for the top dogs and horses, but in the main conditions are poor, and once the animals cease to win races they are likely to be neglected, abandoned, or slaughtered. What about this thing?

Side: Should not
20112618(22) Disputed
1 point

I cannot say that every sport has only advantages.

But, i see that, horses & dogs are animals, which many times ago were involved in such races.

It is not difficult for them, because they have ability to do it.

However, as you can read, i meant that animals should be subjected into enternainment unless this harms them!

Side: Should
1 point

This debate is not about whether it is right for human beings to farm and eat other animals - this is covered in the debates on animal rights and vegetarianism. Neither is it about zoos, which are also covered in their own debate. Rather this debate is about various other uses of animals for sport, pleasure, and entertainment. A wide variety of examples from different cultures around the world might be brought into this debate: 'blood sports' such as fox and stag hunting, and fishing; forms of entertainment using performing animals, such as circuses; and sports in which animals perform for human enjoyment, such as horse racing and bull fighting.

Side: Should not
20112618(22) Disputed
1 point

You may know that not every entertainment involves harmful effects for animals.

Guess you think of this topic widely, because there is not only bad aspects of involving animals into sport, etc.

Side: Should
20110549(18) Disputed
1 point

And what about the circus or zoos? I have an evidence about the circus

Side: Should not
Cinaman1998(40) Clarified
1 point

Bull fighting is primarily a form of entertainment because if they did not do it human would be the dead ones. animals when on these dangerous sports you talk of are subjected to just as much of a chance to death as humans. also hunting since animals have evolved to populate a lot if we stopped our hunting they would become the cause of extinction for other animals.

Side: Should
randome(10) Disputed
1 point

I note that the topic says sport and entertainment so any form of entertainment that humans find entertaining should be included in this argument. This should include zoo because although zoos can be used to gain knowledge about animals, there are also people who deliberately mock and laugh at zoo animals. They throw sticks and rocks and say horrible comments completely for their own entertainment.

Side: Should
1 point

no. come on, animals are God's creatures just like we are and are deserving of proper care, feeding, etc.

Side: Should not