CreateDebate


Debate Info

19
14
Yes No
Debate Score:33
Arguments:24
Total Votes:39
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (10)
 
 No (9)

Debate Creator

sangriagirl(115) pic



Should meditation and Tai Chi be taught in schools?

Yes

Side Score: 19
VS.

No

Side Score: 14

I asked this once except to replace PE but still same concept, yes it SHOULD be taught, and also transcedental meditation should be taught also maybe in high school, we need children to open their minds instead of conform to whats already here, meditation would be a great thing in society if alot of people practiced it

Side: Yes
2 points

Meditation and Tai Chi to replace PE? Your joking right? The point of physical education is to get students interested in sports, help build and support teamwork, good comradeship, healthy fitness and exercise... may I go on?

Side: No
3 points

no one takes PE seriously except cocky alpha males

Side: Yes
1 point

It should not replace PE I think it would be a good idea maybe as part of PE or an after school class as both meditation and tai chi help relaxation and concentration

Side: Yes
2 points

Secular meditation, Tai Chi, and yoga are all demonstrably proven to contribute to both mental and physical health. While this is arguably not in the immediate purview of educational institutions (the primary function being instruction) these practices make a valuable, if indirect, contribution to the learning process and are in their own way a form of self knowledge which is frequently neglected.

Side: Yes

I think it would be beneficial, as a stress relief for children. Also they would understand fighting arts, and that it's not all about violence. Some people might say that it encourages violence, but no-one in my Tai Chi class is violent as we lean a proper etiquette in fighting, and not to hurt other people.

Meditation is very calming also.

I am interested to hear people's opinions on this...?

Side: Yes
1 point

I think that would be neat, and I did a similar debate once for martial arts in general. I wish my primary schools did that kind of thing. I mean, rounders is much more violent, and football and . . . NETBALL. I have personally maimed and been maimed in all of these. I think martial arts are much safer.

Meditation, definitely. This has loads of proven health benefits and psychological benefits also. Maybe there would be less maniacs if we had meditation in schools.

Side: Yes
1 point

I took three semesters of Yoga in highschool in which we had a time set aside to meditate silently. I can say from a personal standpoint it was noticeably beneficial. I then see no reason not to offer it on the condition that–like all other mind sets–it is not compulsorily impressed on the youth.

Side: Yes
1 point

Despite the talk about new-age stuff, it's still important for children to learn to open up their minds and be creative as well as relaxed and stress free. I feel in school often, children are taught to grow up too fast, just to keep up with the world around them. Learning techniques as to how to stay positive in life, and to manifest your reality will make a big difference.

In some schools they already teach yoga and Tai Chi. When I was in 8th grade, in home economics, we would drink tea and do Tai Chi every Tuesday. It was great, and everyone enjoyed it. Its not religion, it doesn't have to be, since there are proven scientific ways to release stress and open up your mind with your body

Side: Yes
1 point

As electives sure, but not at core required courses.

Side: Yes
2 points

Because no one else will, I will.

In the current Education system, for Canada, we have a five class schedule, again, at least in the School I know. These five courses generally are as follow: Economics, History, French, Math, and English. Please, tell me as to what we're suppose to get rid of to fit in two new courses.

Side: No
Elvira(3446) Clarified
1 point

Only five? In England we do Maths, English language, English literature, biology, chemistry, physics, geography, drama, art, physical exercise, history, religious studies, a language, math, technology, in year seven to eight and then we specialise into certain subjects, with compulsory subjects such as biology, chemistry (sciences taken as two or three subjects, or one if you do the land based), physics, math, eng lang, eng lit, a language, rs short course (worth half a gcse), and recreational PE (although this is not an exam subject)... we usually do more than 8 GCSE's, I did 9.5.

And wow, you do no sciences...?

I can totally see how the English system could make room, especially in primary schools. Get rid of recreational PE. We have after-school clubs for that. Get rid of RS, no-one likes it anyway, and it's biased. Get rid of life-skills, a lesson where we sit there filling in quizzes or reading about drugs. They can talk about that in form time. I'm sure any system could work it somehow.

Side: Yes
Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

As stated below, no sciences this term, last term I had my science course.

As for waht you said about getting rid of some of the courses, I disagree and agree. The statement about PE being gone will never happen, we have a too high of a level of obesity, as such, we need it the class.

Side: Yes
Kittiana(154) Clarified
1 point

In America, we have 6, sometimes 7 courses, that include 5 or six mandatory, and 1 or 2 electives. Wow.

Side: Yes
Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

We have our 5 mandatory, each at an hour each, one elective(grade10), another hour, and after grade 10, you have all but one course as an elective for an hour. Keep in mind though that we also swap classes mid-term. Last term I went with PE and Science, this term I have French and History.

Side: Yes

Not really as a mandatory class but it should be offered. Or it could be a two week period in gym classes for this. I think it should be an optional class though.

Side: No

I could only see it as an optional class. Also, meditation and Tai Chi might not be relaxing if your getting marked on it (assuming that a student would be graded on it).

Side: No
2 points

No, not compulsary anyway. Meditation could be taught in RE (but to the students consent) and Tai Chi could also be a course in PE. But I can't see how these can get you anywhere in life. These to rather minor, unimportant subjects on top of all I have to do now for GCSE's in a few weeks is too much to cram in.

Side: No

thats completely stooooooopid!!!!

Side: No
1 point

no, why would you want it in the first place? mediation doesn't do anything for me and its pointless.

Side: No
1 point

It is not something the school should teach. Some parents are against it, religious or otherwise.

Should children be taught coping mechanisms for stress? Absolutely.

But meditation and Tai Chi are not the answers.

Side: No
sangriagirl(115) Disputed
1 point

How can you be against meditation? And how is it not something schools can teach?

Some parents are against all sorts of things, but they have no say in the curriculum.

Side: Yes
lupusFati(790) Disputed
1 point

Don't misunderstand me. I am against meditation and Tai Chi being taught in schools as something required. I might be fine if it were a free after-school thing that used parental permission, or an equivelant thereof. But just going ahead and having every student taking part in it no matter what opens the school up for liability if they do not give parents their right to raise their children as they see fit.

It is not the beneficial effects of meditation that concern me. It is how parents view it and how parents raise their children because of it. Requiring something that could even violate their right to practice their religion as they see fit can conflict.

If someone can win a lawsuit against McDonald's for hot coffee burns, you'd better believe they can sue for religious 'persecution'.

The bottom line is this: It is not the right of the school to raise a child. It is the parents' right. When a school undermines parental authority (assuming a healthy family home environement/relationships), that's where I have issues.

Side: No