CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
5
Yup! No way!
Debate Score:11
Arguments:7
Total Votes:11
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yup! (4)
 
 No way! (3)

Debate Creator

CupioMinimus(99) pic



Should our 'representatives' be paid a modal average wage?

In order that their policies and decisions impact them as they do most other people.

Yup!

Side Score: 6
VS.

No way!

Side Score: 5

Actually, we should raise the stacks, in order to be a representative, they must have an another job. This can't be there only job. Being a representative would be merely part time.

Side: Yup!
gcomeau(536) Disputed
1 point

So we want the people running the government to have even more incentive not to put too much effort into it?

Yeah... I'm sure that will fix things right up. I mean, spending the last thirty years having half the country vote for people to run the government who think the government shouldn't do things has worked so wonderfully already...

Side: No way!
2 points

Yes, Texas has only part time representatives. This keeps out the busybodies out.

Side: Yup!

They should not be paid more than are soldiers risking there lives.

Side: not more than are soildiers
2 points

Going with no until you provide details of how the modal wage would be calculated.

If it includes penalties for creating higher stdev in national wages then a defined target value, then sure. Otherwise, no.

Side: No way!
CupioMinimus(99) Disputed
1 point

Obviously I'd leave that up to one as knowledgeable as yourself, but make sure all the raw data was published so that the masses could check your figures.

Side: Yup!