CreateDebate


Debate Info

12
65
No, it's immoral and dangerous Yes, regulate it and tax it
Debate Score:77
Arguments:34
Total Votes:94
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No, it's immoral and dangerous (8)
 
 Yes, regulate it and tax it (26)

Debate Creator

Tamisan(890) pic



Should prostitution be legalized?

Is legalizing prostitution a means to prevent STDs and avoid subjecting women to chronic abuse and intolerable conditions? Or is it just another excuse for cheating?


No, it's immoral and dangerous

Side Score: 12
VS.

Yes, regulate it and tax it

Side Score: 65
3 points

When it comes to prostitution, the moral and ethical implications should not be as important as the safety issues. Others have already mentioned the health problems and the diseases that could spread, but the people who sell themselves are, obviously, at an intense risk and disadvantage when they go to work. I feel like when the government allows prostitution, they will be opening up a whole new can of worms. With any

new business in the pleasure industry, the level of degradation and mistreatment that the vendor has to endure is extreme. When a body becomes a plaything for lease, the person slowly looses worth and rules go out the window. My largest concern is for the children involved in prostitution. How does the government regulate who can sell their body and who can't? How do they stop those children from being recruited by pimps and other prostitution organizations? Regulation is a problem even in the Netherlands where the red-light district is famous and thriving. 80% of the women are foreigners and 70% don't have ID papers because they were brought into work from other countries by black market organizations. If a country that small has problems keeping reigns on prostitution, what will become of the US if we allow people to sell themselves? Disease, naturally, and an unsafe environment for our teenagers, but what about children and young women who become victims of trafficing? Also, birth control, in many states, is not cheap or readily available. Ironically, it isn't covered by health insurance the way Viagra is (how weird is that?) and so if prostitutes get pregnant, what becomes of the children? They're just numbers in an overflowing foster care system. The idea gets romanticized by men who think that the ready-availability of pleasure is just business in a capitalist market where everything is for sale, but what about the people who get lost in the shuffle? I understand that most people probably think of prostitution and they think that it will come organization and tight reigns. But come on, how realistic is that?

Supporting Evidence: Child prostitutes (www.childrenofthenight.org)
Side: Minors in prostitution
Keaegan(30) Disputed
3 points

The point is that right now, there is no regulation. Without any, your listed scenarios will continue to occur. Just like drinking during Prohibition, people are showing that they are going to continue to get prostitutes. Prostitution is has been around for millennia. Until the hall of the Vestal Virgins was taken down (which was the last church in Rome before it fell) by religious extremists of the time, prostitution was available.

When the Vestal Virgins church/brothel, whatever people are going to call it, was destroyed, prostitution was stymied.

When the government goes in to help with any issue, there are going to be cases that fall through the cracks. It is unfortunate and sad. However, there will be individuals that WILL be helped if and only if the government steps in.

Here is the formula I see:

No government regulation= 100% losses on the issues

Government involvement= Government being able to save some people.

And besides, if the government makes prostitution legal for 18+, and regulates brothels, and finds one using minors in an inspection, that brothel gets shut down. The children would be returned home, etc. When a woman can say openly that she is a prostitute without fear of going to jail, she will be able to be more open about what is wrong where she works.

Side: Its safer if it's legal
1 point

Prostitution is inseparably connected to unclean health practices.

If someone has sex with people for a living, we're talking about a DRASTICALLY higher risk of contracting and spreading STDs, despite the various prophylactics available. Remember no prophylactic is perfect as preventing the spread of disease. (besides full-body plastic-wrap)

We're constantly warring with the quick evolution of viruses, and one our our best weapons is avoiding the conflict. Prostitution puts you on the front lines, and although it may be your personal perogative, you may be hurting mankind as a whole by increasing the likelihood of virus evolution.

Also, the many of the people who need to pay for sex are probably already at a higher risk for having diseases.

Did you ever think that STDs might be one of the factors that led cultural evolution to value things like virginity and marrage?

Side: No, it's immoral and dangerous
Cdelvalle(196) Disputed
3 points

STDs weren't a factor. It was religion. We have sanctity of both things because the U.S. is predominantly a christian nation.

I believe sleeping with a regulated prostitute is actually safer then sleeping with someone you've met and talked to a few times.

So in reality, prostitution, when regulated, is far cleaner and safer beause there is no vested interest for the other person to lie to you about disease. Plus, they get tested.So if they have disease they get the ax.

Haven't you read up at all about how regulating prositution works?

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
1 point

well all people who think it should be legalized are stupid. for one it is not victimless inany sense, and two the govenment legalizing it would just help spread aids. if it stays this way there is less of a risk.

Side: No, it's immoral and dangerous
0 points

Legalizing prostitution would protect no one. Sex outside of monogamous, marital relationships increases the spread of STDs, not to mention broken families, broken hearts and broken soles. Prostitutes are victims, often sexually abused youths working, not by choice, under the suppression of "pimps." They prostitute themselves to either stay alive or support an illegal drug habit or both. The government, in this case, should step in with laws to protect all parties from themselves.

Side: Prostitution is Unsafe
Keaegan(30) Disputed
2 points

I have to disagree. Sex with people that have an STD increases the risk of catching an STD, not having sex outside of marriage. For instance, if man A and woman A have sex, and woman A has Herpes, man A can catch Herpes. If neither party have one, there is no risk.

This sounds more like an argument for religion, not for whether or not prostitution should be legalized.

Side: Math should add up
0 points

I think it is too dangerous. Strip clubs are as far as it should go when it comes to that kind of thing.

Side: No, it's immoral and dangerous
-2 points
jessald(1915) Disputed
3 points

1) Prostitution is not inherently immoral. It's simply an exchange of money for a service. It's like paying someone to mow your lawn, only more fun.

2) It would be safer if it was legal because then it could be subjected to government oversight, just like the food and drug industries.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
Cdelvalle(196) Disputed
3 points

It would be safer because the government mandates prostitutes be checked for disease.

Today, you nor I are mandated to check ourselves for STDs. And we are not mandated to tell another person that we have one, even if we did.

In a government regulated whore house, those aren't worries because prostitutes are regularly checked (weekly or bi-weekly) and they lose their job if they had any disease.

Check out the stats and you'll see the incidence of disease due to legal prostitution is extremly low... much lower then the incidence of STDs in regular society.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
3 points

Agreed. For example, Nevada prostitutes are required by law to be checked for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV on a weekly basis. Since 1988, the law also requires that condoms be used during all sexual contact. The mandatory testing began in 1986, and since that time, there has not been a single instance in which a brothel prostitute has tested positive for HIV. It is arguable, then, that since illegal prostitution is unregulated by any entity, prostitutes and their customers at a higher risk of contracting disease than those involved in legal prostitution.

Side: HIV and STD's among prostitutes
6 points

A human body should never be subject to the laws or regulations of any outside entity, which means that prostitution should definitely be legalized. What a person chooses to do with his or her body is his or her own business, not the government's. Besides, the government putting a ban on something very rarely solves the problem it was trying to solve in the first place (e.g. alcohol, drugs, guns, gambling, and prostitution for that matter...). Prohibition should be the last thing the check off the list. Legalizing, regulating, and taxing prostitution will bring in some extra money for the government (which we all know it needs) and will reduce the swelling prison population by removing inmates who committed victimless crimes.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
5 points

If you want to talk of immorality, why not talk about the war profiteers? Why not talk of the oil speculators? Why not talk of the tobacco industry?

Prostitution, although unsavory, is as legitimate a service as being a maid, or a plumber. It fulfills a need.

And although I disagree with prostitution..... it is not our place to use our opinions of how "immoral" something is to deem it illegal or banned without legitimate reason.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
4 points

When it comes down to it, is there any real, valid reason prostitution is illegal? All right, it can be questionable morally, but how is it a threat to society? In fact, making it legal makes it less of a threat, because then it can be treated as a legitimate business, with health care and insurance, and steady wages. The women would have more protection from abusive johns and pimps, and men would have greater assurances of not getting robbed. The ability to tax it is just an added bonus.

Side: Its safer if it's legal
flowen(6) Disputed
0 points

Prostitution is only a problem because of drugs and crime I say don't legalise it because it wont work, they are doing it for the simple reason to make money for their next fix...They hate doing it but because drugs have got a strong hold on there lives they end up resorting to selling their bodies for quick cash.

More support should be given to help them overcome their drug problem..And shame on the men who sneak off for a 'quickie' in between playing happy families and those public officials who do the same.

Side: Moral Decay
pianogurlken(20) Disputed
4 points

I think that is wrong to categorize all prostitutes as drug addicts looking for a fix, maybe if they weren't projected in the media as such you wouldn't have such a distorted view of prostitution. This may well in fact be the case for some but not for all. There are many who are forced into prostitution. In addition, would you consider the men and women that engage in pornography "prostitutes" when in fact they are selling their bodies for the viewing pleasure of someone else? or would you just consider them "porn stars". In my view, prostitution is just in 2 different views, the illegal view and the legal view. The illegal, which are the bordello's and women and men on the streets that sell their bodies for money that is untaxed and then pornography a big business that is being taxed.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
duncer(418) Disputed
0 points

..... your an idiot dont steriotype people you moron for all you know only 3% only do it for drugs...

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it

Prostitution has been with us from the beginning of time. There is no way we can rid ourselves of this type of business so why not legalize it and have all people who are willing to sell sexual contact be registered and seen to medically. The rise of STD's is staggering and while I don't mean to put the statistics squarely on top of the prostitutes shoulders we can, at the very least, control the diseases which still plague us. There is also nothing wrong with taxing it since it is a business but if it came right down to it I'd rather see them be checked by the CDC than anything else.

Side: Its safer if it's legal
3 points

The question is not whether prostitution should be legal, the question should be why is it illegal? In a supposed free society, adults should be able to make personal, private life-style choices without government interference. Adults choosing to buy sex from other consenting adults should be a natural act in a free society. What has occurred in the United States and some other countries is the state enforcement of the religious and moral codes of one group of citizens over everyone else. Pushed underground, prostitution and other vices become underground activities, run by criminals and outlaws, who use to the proceeds to finance even more criminal enterprises. Remember, the Mafia became strong by selling bootleg alcohol during Prohibition.

Commercial Sex In A Free Society
Side: Its safer if it's legal
3 points

No question- legalize. All of these laws that try to regulate morality don't end the activities they are trying to prevent. Making prostitution illegal only sends it underground, creating a fertile ground for crime, abuse, and STDs- not to mention un-wanted pregnancies resulting in more abortions . People will cheat on each other- it is part of human nature, and nothing will ever stop that. There is a reason prostitution is called the oldest profession- human desire.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it

Yes, regulate it like in Denmark but only after asking the Danes what unforeseen side effects they have encountered and figuring out ways to counter the negative effects.

I guess there are some people out there that (for whatever reason) are too impatient to develop a relationship or can only get sex by paying for it. Luckily I don't belong to either one of those groups so who am I to deny them their pleasure.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
2 points

It's just one of those things that have always been done, there even are some monkeys that do it too, and it's plain idiotic to try and prohibit something that will simply never stop. I care about dignity of women. And women are stripped of their dignity when they decide for whatever reason to go into prostitution... and they are stripped of their dignity not because of the prostitution itself, but because of the prohibition that forces them into the sad ugly crime scene.

Side: Its safer if it's legal
2 points

There's an old addage that says you "can't legislate morality," and I think there are some things that can't be legislated. Prostitution is going to exist whether or not we legalize it. There's a reason it's called "the world's oldest profession."

However, I suppose there could be some type of taxation levied, but I fail to see how it could be enforced, unless the prostitutes were required to work in "legitimate" brothels.

Would that not be restriction of trade?

Side: Legislating Morality
1 point

Legalize it and control it but you must think about the side effects. A major side effect would be an increase in the number of cases of anxiety attacks among do gooders and bible thumpers.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
1 point

Might as well. People are going to do it anyway. At least this way maybe people will be required to be tested and regulated.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
1 point

There are several arguments that all say that we should not allow prostitution on several bases mostly moral/ethics or medical. In either case people should take a closer examination of themselves and come to realize what is reality and what is fiction. It would be nice to live in a world where people do not kill each other, where people respect one another not for their fame and money but for simply being a human being. The reality is that the world is not really that pretty. People have biological urges which need fulfilling and the like. In any case we need to come to a consensual understanding of what world we live in.

Prostitution happens whether people want to admit it or not. In doing so people are one, endangering themselves and helping spread sexually transmitted diseases (STD's) and two, making money which is not being accounted for or taxed. There are other places around the world like the city of Amsterdam in which prostitution as well as other 'immoral' things are legal such as drugs. The difference is that such things are monitored and regulated in that prostitutes must go and get physical examinations. If they are found to have a STD or other potentially transmitted disease they are obligated by law to inform their customers.

On a more personal note I do not fully understand why it is ok for Americans to be allowed to smoke and choose to run the risk of cancer, or choose to go sky-diving and the like, which has risks yet one of the biggest arguments against legalizing prostitution are the health factors. There are risks that people take everyday whether we want to or not. Everyday people run the risk of getting into car accidents, and plane crashes; every day the people on earth run the risk of being wiped out by a meteor and so on. There are many risks that occur yet we focus on the risk of getting a STD from a prostitute.

The biggest argument in my opinion that there is against legalizing prostitution are the ethical issues, not the medical ones. A lot of people are concerned that America’s position will be changed in that other countries will frown on the fact that we have legalized prostitution. How can this be true when there are several other countries including countries in Europe that have also legalized prostitution? What comes to mind when one thinks of a prostitute? A person of less moral standards, one who is poor, lives in the 'bad' areas of a city or town. They generally are not in good health and probably have STD's. This is really the perception of our society. By legalizing prostitution perceptions would be changed, since it would no longer be an illegal act but a legitimate method of income with taxes being removed and regulations being placed.

If parents do not wish for this to be legalized they need to realize that it is their job as their child’s caregiver to inform their children and guide them based on their morals. The same is said for smoking, alcohol and drug use. Parents advocate against it saying that they should not have to raise children in an environment where there is smoking and the like, but as the rights of others smoking or drinking should not be taken away simply because parents do not wish their children to use such products. For this reason is should be up to the parents to stop their children to take the products, but do not push one's morals on everyone else. Just because a parent does not think that smoking or drinking is ok does not mean that no one should be able to take those actions.

In summary we should legalize prostitution for the following reasons:

- It will become a legitimate form of work meaning that the government will take taxes and enforce regulations making it safer then it is now.

- People are doing it anyway, and at its current state it is not very safe for neither the prostitute nor the buyer.

- While there will always be certain risks that come from transmission of diseases and the like, there are risks for everything.

- The biggest reason for people not approving of the idea is not of medical issues but of moral issues.

- If parents do not wish for their sons/daughters to participate in such actions or go into that line of work (should it ever be legalized), they should take responsibility and educate their child on their ideas of the situation.

- Just because people do not agree with the idea of prostitution does not mean that we should take the freedom of that choice away from other people.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
1 point

Yes, License it, Regulate it, and Tax it, and then provide social support for it, while working heavily to combat Human Trafficking.

I have a lot more written about this on my BLog: http://www.arionshome.com/social-activism/prostitution/

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
0 points

yes, but how strict are the regulations? i guess checking for stds is alright, but that's it.

but yeah, i mean, it's okay to have a shit load of sex for free, so why not pay for it? under a market it would be safer than than promiscuous sex. plus, it would put the trannies of New York out of business and they'll go homeless and die, thus, ending our Tranny problem.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
mufasa(1) Disputed
1 point

How would it put them out of business, you don't think they could work legally?

"they'll go homeless and die, thus, ending our Tranny problem." You are a sick person!

Side: Its safer if it's legal
0 points

Gene Simmons thinks so! He has written a book titled Ladies of the Night: a Historical Perspective of the Oldest Profession in the World. Simmons appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe to discuss the book. His research found that in many cultures, prostitutes exist/existed at the highest levels of society. They are/were respected political or religious figures. He feels that due to America's puritanical roots, our country fears sex and is unable to bring the subject into the light.

Supporting Evidence: From Simmons Own Mouth (mefeedia.com)
Side: The Simmons Perspective
brandon(1) Disputed
0 points

Those who think that regulating and legalising prostitution will work, they must be prepared to their family members working as prostitutes. Legalising prostitution is just a trick to turn away from the responsibility of providing a dignified and respectable source of lively hood. those who do this as choice deserve AIDS at the earliest.

Side: No, it's immoral and dangerous
Tamisan(890) Disputed
1 point

I wouldn't mind if my mother, aunt, sister, or daughter was a sex worker so long as the law protected her. If I knew she couldn't be abused (any more than in any other job) and only perform those activities she agreed to (like in most any other job), I see no reason not to let her have a career in the field.

There was a time when ANY woman working out of the home was seen as obscene and whore-like. In fact, some in this world still see it that way. Such folks need to get with the facts of the world we live in. And one of those facts is that sex workers have always and will always exist--even in an era of pleasure robots and sex toys.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it
thtwhtguy22(2) Disputed
1 point

While I understand that you may have a strong moral point of view and there are several others who would agree, I do not think that this is a very strong argument simply because you have no legitimate reasons that people should not be allowed to engage in legalized prostitution. There are several facts that all say that it's safe as long as it is regulated. there are laws that protect people...laws that must be adhered to or the business is closed...and furthermore just because a person thinks that people have the freedom to be able to choose to buy time with a prostitute or not does not make them immoral or doesn't even mean that they want it to be legal so they can participate. On a personal note I agree with it because our country is based on freedoms, and at the moment 48 states are saying that people do not have the freedom to choose whether or not they want to pay for sex. Just because people think that it is immoral does not mean that everyone thinks so...overall the opinions of some should not govern the lives of many...that's why we have a democracy so the mass can give their opinions and the few upper-class/rich/educated or any other small but powerful group cannot impose their will on everyone else.

Side: Yes, regulate it and tax it