Should schools monitor what students do on the internet?
Yes
Side Score: 9
|
No
Side Score: 10
|
|
|
|
1
point
As a student, I really really want to say no. But the truth is that students should definitely be monitored. Because, as a student, I know what other students are capable of doing, and what they would like to do if only they had a few more freedoms. Serious damage to public school networks, library files, local school files and records. Because all of the computers are connected to the same network, it isn't safe for the school records or networks to just give a student free reign over the internet. Side: Yes
Schools are institutes for education. The internet service is provided to support that intended purpose. Consequentially, it is reasonable for schools to monitor what students are using the internet for. There is not reason that students need to use the internet for anything other than educational purposes while they are at school, and in particular when they are in class. As far as whether schools should monitor students' use of the internet, I think that might depend upon the need to do so versus the resources it would take to do so. Restricting certain websites is a more efficient option, particularly if abuse of the internet is not a significant problem. Side: Yes
My school has a very effective system in place. From a central location, teachers/administrators are capable of monitoring student internet use. This is only done when there is strong suspicion that a student is using it inappropriately. My school is a private, college preparatory high school and therefore demands success. I think its reasonable for the school to want every student's best and support that through an accountability system. This is very much within their power as they are providing the computers. Anything else would be an invasion of personal privacy. Of course, misuse of the internet is somewhat rare here, so it never really has been much of a problem anyway. Side: Yes
1
point
Of course internet access should be monitored by schools. The majority of teens and children are immature, to put it blunt. I'm a student, and I realize some websites are necessary for educational purposes, but only those sites should be allowed access. After all, allowing them to roam to whatever site they want is being...counterproductive, and wasting the teacher's and student's time and resources. Side: Yes
Yes, they should. The purpose of schools is so that students can gain a good education through the environment and teaching standards around them. They can learn with their friends, through clubs, societies, school libraries and ... through the Internet. If the standards are not suitable for learning on the Internet then the students' education standards may begin to decline and their quality of work may not be so good - ruining their future. Schools should monitor what happens on the Internet. Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
|
Monitor students? Meh. I disagree. There's already the capability to block certain websites, and that's sufficient enough to prevent anything the students shouldn't be looking at. And yes, I know there are proxies to get past such security functions, but anyone who has that knowledge probably has the ability to get past computer monitoring. Side: No
2
points
If the students are using the school network (which is the only way the school could monitor their use) then it is not an invasion of privacy because it is not a private or personal network. There is also an express purpose for the internet being provided (i.e. education). Abuse is a reasonable concern under any circumstance, but any authority granted to one entity over another entity can be abused. That alone is not enough reason to make it wrong, unless it has a unique likelihood to be abused which I don't know that it does. Moreover, there are recourses for abuse of power. Side: Yes
2
points
1
point
Schools are fully within their legal right to monitor the students on school owned computers. As for whether they should do it, I would say no. If they already have the blocks in place that prevent them from going to "dangerous" places on the internet, then what purpose would monitoring have? Side: No
|