Should steriods be aloud in sports
Steriods have been killing and making people stronger over some time. People in sports use them to enhance there ability to play, and look bigger and scarier. And some people just take them for the effect of muscle build up. But some people don't know it makes ur penis shrink, and if u start using it, that it would be a bad idea to stop.
Yes they should
Side Score: 20
|
 |
No they shouldn't
Side Score: 28
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, really, does anyone not in congress really care what these guys put in their body? They're adults, they choose to take a drug, they know the side effects, they weigh the risks, so who cares? and by the way, steroids don't shrink the penis, they shrink the balls, and who needs those anyway? reportedly steroids can actually make the male penis a little bigger, but once you get old, and stop taking the stuff, everything shrinks, including the penis. Side: Yes they should
1
point
3
points
1
point
1
point
They should start by creating two separate sports leagues one for the clean athletes and one for the juicers.How long before the league of superfreak drugs dustbins becomes the more watched? I would guess not long. If people want to take steroids then let them its their body and their life. Plus it would lead to some epic sports. Side: Yes they should
1
point
0
points
The whole purpose of a sport is to become as good as you can to defeat the opponent. If someone wants to take the risk of shrinking their 'nads to increase their muscle, by all means, let them! Steroids will increase performance, therefore increasing enjoyment of the crowd. All good things. If steroids aren't allowed, then I don't think work-out equipment should be allowed. Let them inhance their skills, its what sports is allll about. Side: Yes they should
|
2
points
2
points
0
points
2
points
1
point
1
point
That's ridiculous. If I'm on steroids, and he's on steroids, and etc, then who's really winning? Yes your good on your own, but if everyone begins to take steroids then it turns into who takes the best steroid instead of, who has the best potential or really is the best. Side: No they shouldn't
1
point
Let me put it this way. If many athletes want to use steroids, they should split every sport into two; those who do not use, those who do. Then once each season is completed they should head off vs. each other for a championship. (aka. steroid users vs non steroid users) Since I was a kid I was very much against any kind of "help" in weight training, sports training, etc. (i mean anything like steroids, which is hormonal, or steroid like products, aka supplements like creatine, many people just coin these items as athletic aids) The great thing was that I usually took a little longer to get to my peak vs the "athletic aid" users but when I reached it, I almost always maxed them out. It would be a very curious scientific and social experiment to see the two sides play out. P.S. I think you meant allowed...typing errors in the headline of an argument are no no's. Side: No they shouldn't
1
point
|
