CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
22
Yes No
Debate Score:28
Arguments:15
Total Votes:31
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (6)
 
 No (9)

Debate Creator

TheEccentric(3382) pic



Should teachers use collective punishment?

For example if a lot of people in a class are being badly behaved but some people aren't is is OK for the teacher to place the whole class in detention?

Yes

Side Score: 6
VS.

No

Side Score: 22

It will encourage people to bully the bad kids rather than the nerds.

Currently the well-behaved kids get bullied but if the cause of distress becomes the guy making everyone get punished then bullying can be used for positive peer pressure.

Side: Yes
1 point

Unfortunately its necessary. I do the same with my class. If there is a class and half of them are continuously you have no choice but to punish the whole class. It would be more unfair just to pick on the 2 or 3 you happen to catch. If you were to do it that way the it would also show the ones that you didn't catch that they can get away with disrupting the lesson.

Side: Yes
3 points

It is easy to tell who is disrupting the lesson unless you are blind.

Side: No
Atrag(5666) Disputed
1 point

Okay a scenario then. A class of 25 children with about 15 of them constantly talking. 5 of them also talk a lot but not too bad - they've behaved more or less but they just listen more. 5 of them behaved well the entire lesson. What would you do?

Side: Yes

It is unfair for those who are not misbehaving to be punished for the behavior of others and it is such a lazy way of handing out punishment. It is usually used when the teacher just can't be asked to pick out individuals and punish just them instead.

Side: No

I remember this exact situation happened to me when a majority of the class would misbehave but I got punished with the rest of the class for having to stay after school.

Side: No
2 points

The first reason is misbehaving students don’t care if others are punished for their actions. Actually, they prefer it. It means that they don’t have to suffer alone. So, in all honesty, this is ineffective.

The second reason is collective punishment gives students a reason to misbehave. If you know you’re going to get punished for showing up in a classroom, then why don’t you break some rules? I mean, you’re going to get punished anyway, where is the incentive to behave?

The third reason is collective punishment damages the relationship between the teacher and the well-behaved students. Even if they choose to behave instead of misbehave, they will still feel the sting of injustice. They know the consequence is not only unfair, but unjust. Of course, these students will resent the real culprits, but they will resent the teacher more.

The final reason is, if I am not mistaken, the goal of punishment is to correct and redirect the actions of those who are in the wrong. If so, then what is the goal of punishing those who didn’t do anything wrong? Is it to correct and redirect the actions of those who are in the right? To teach them to misbehave? Is this really what you are striving for?

Side: No
2 points

I was a victim of collective punishment in school which still makes my blood boil to this day. If the whole class is bad except for a couple of kids there is NO chance that minority can persuade or use peer pressure to stop the rest from misbehaving.

I dropped out of choir because I found my inclusion in collective punishment so absurd. I in fact was the only member of the class who even completed the punishment by deadline, the rest all refused or got mommy and daddy to defend their bad behavior. So unfair.

Side: No