Should the U.S.A.,/N.A.T.O., respond in kind if Putin uses chemical weapons?
Slippery sloop to WW3.
Side Score: 4
|
 |
We must stand up to the filth.
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
|
This type of ultimatum could start a tit-for-tat escalation and give THE FILTH PUTIN an excuse to introduce tactical nuclear weapons into the conflict. The next step up would be strategic atomic weapons and then, Armageddon? Tough decision with serious implications one way or other. Shame we don't have a competent, strong and steady hand on the wheel. Side: Slippery sloop to WW3.
|
1
point
I suppose if we consider in-depth what Biden said about ''responding in-kind'' we have to accept that what he meant was we would use chemical weapons against either Russian troops and/or Russian civilians. God forbid the day we use chemical weapons against either enemy troops or the civilian population of a hostile power. Side: Slippery sloop to WW3.
@HappyCat;- N.A.T.O., was more or less dormant for decades until Putin decided to invade his peaceful and inoffensive neighbor, Ukraine. During N.A.T.O.'s stagnant years there was no publishing or broadcasting of propaganda or issuing of any threats. Any aggressive rhetoric came from THE FILTH, PUTIN who at one point mouthed the term;- N.A.T.O, and at the same time give the one fingered gesture. THAT IS RAW AGGRESSION, AND IT'S YOU WHO IS ''THE PLEB, PUTIN'S PLEB. FAKE NEWS SUCH AS YOU'RE TRYING TO PEDDLE HERE TURNS UP IN THE MOST UNEXPECTED PLACES. Side: We must stand up to the filth.
|
