CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
5
Slippery sloop to WW3. We must stand up to the filth.
Debate Score:9
Arguments:12
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Slippery sloop to WW3. (4)
 
 We must stand up to the filth. (5)

Debate Creator

Pench(841) pic



Should the U.S.A.,/N.A.T.O., respond in kind if Putin uses chemical weapons?

President Poopy Pants has, for once, shown some backbone and leadership by putting ''THE FILTH'' on notice that if they introduce chemical weapons into Putin's war with the Ukraine we will ''respond in kind''. 
Is this the right stance to take, or will ''THE FILTH PUTIN'' be able to use such a move as evidence of the West's allegiance with Ukraine to the WAR SUPPORTING RUSSIAN PUBLIC WHO SEEM TO BE BEHIND THEIR MASTER ?

Slippery sloop to WW3.

Side Score: 4
VS.

We must stand up to the filth.

Side Score: 5
1 point

This type of ultimatum could start a tit-for-tat escalation and give THE FILTH PUTIN an excuse to introduce tactical nuclear weapons into the conflict.

The next step up would be strategic atomic weapons and then, Armageddon?

Tough decision with serious implications one way or other.

Shame we don't have a competent, strong and steady hand on the wheel.

Side: Slippery sloop to WW3.
luchito(70) Disputed
1 point

I don't think Ukraine is worthy enough to start a nuclear confrontation.

WW3 will be triggered by extreme changes in the world, like a worldwide catastrophe.

Side: We must stand up to the filth.
1 point

PUTIN THE FILTH must be faced up to in a strong and self-assured manner.

Putin must be told, RIGHT, if you want to play hardball so be it, and we should openly place our nuclear defence weaponry onto cocked-pistol/ Defcon 1 level.

Side: We must stand up to the filth.
1 point

Should the U.S.A.,/N.A.T.O., respond in kind if Putin uses chemical weapons?

Hello P:

WWG1WGA.

THAT, my friend, is the ONLY reason NATO exists..

excon

PS: Those darn Qanon'ers certainly know how to turn a phrase, don't they?

Side: We must stand up to the filth.
Developing(493) Disputed
1 point

Excon. This is not a logical debate argument. This website is dead.

Side: Slippery sloop to WW3.
Pench(841) Clarified
1 point

I suppose if we consider in-depth what Biden said about ''responding in-kind'' we have to accept that what he meant was we would use chemical weapons against either Russian troops and/or Russian civilians.

God forbid the day we use chemical weapons against either enemy troops or the civilian population of a hostile power.

Side: Slippery sloop to WW3.
HappyCat(159) Disputed
1 point

NATO now only exists to pump you with propaganda, false flags, and turn the world in the direction the billionaires want it to go in. You're just their useful pleb.

Side: Slippery sloop to WW3.
excon(17785) Disputed
1 point

You're just their useful pleb.

Hello HC:

I'm not here to be liked. I'm here to win debates, and I do. That I’m HATED by the right wingers is ample proof of that.

Bwa, ha ha ha ha..

excon

Side: We must stand up to the filth.
Pench(841) Disputed
1 point

@HappyCat;- N.A.T.O., was more or less dormant for decades until Putin decided to invade his peaceful and inoffensive neighbor, Ukraine.

During N.A.T.O.'s stagnant years there was no publishing or broadcasting of propaganda or issuing of any threats.

Any aggressive rhetoric came from THE FILTH, PUTIN who at one point mouthed the term;- N.A.T.O, and at the same time give the one fingered gesture. THAT IS RAW AGGRESSION, AND IT'S YOU WHO IS ''THE PLEB, PUTIN'S PLEB.

FAKE NEWS SUCH AS YOU'RE TRYING TO PEDDLE HERE TURNS UP IN THE MOST UNEXPECTED PLACES.

Side: We must stand up to the filth.