CreateDebate


Debate Info

27
23
Yes. No.
Debate Score:50
Arguments:45
Total Votes:71
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. (21)
 
 No. (19)

Debate Creator

iPhi(239) pic



Should the death penalty be legal?

it's always interesting to compare these responses to the abortion debaters

Yes.

Side Score: 27
VS.

No.

Side Score: 23
1 point

Blunt murder, serial killing, terrorism, leftist extremism, homosexuality/bisexuality/lesbianism, man hate(feminazism), abortion, cross dressing, "transgenderism", pedophilia/post statuary rape are all severe sins. I do have to say, if the criminal is beyond help, beyond saving and is a REAL danger to yourself and to society, including your friends and family, let the law handle it, whatever it may be. Just don't get yourself into trouble to the point of seeing yourself get yeeted. They used to hang outlaws back then and anyone who was a severe convict. These days, we do have lenient laws but it's grown....too lenient. I will say, I used to disagree with the death penalty, but in these years, I have only seen more and more wickedness arise as an attempt to overcome what is good. The Bible does support the death penalty in the Old Testament. In the New Testament, Jesus teaches us to love one another, including our enemies. This teaching is often seen as an open door to justifying sin for the criminals out there. But that's twisting what Jesus taught because still, you may show love and mercy to your enemy, but that does not mean you justify their actions nor take the law into your own hands unless ofc you can prevent yourself from breaking it. This is why Batman doesn't kill. He is a concerned citizen who lets the law handle things and yes, some criminals have faced death sentences and Batman stayed out of it even though he disagrees with it for some villains that he believes can be redeemed. Some I will say are beyond redeemable and Batman just doesn't say anything because he knows, some criminals will just get what they deserve naturally. I'm basically doing the same thing because it is out of common sense. However, God is just. He doesn't let the wicked get away with their sins. I will just have to say, I will not get involved too much in deciding whether a convict should be punished by the death penalty, but I will just have to say, it still exists in some countries because they do not tolerate severe crime. It is only what they want what is best for their people. Pedophiles such as lgbtpedos for example, deserve no leniency because they want to indoctrinate kids into their gross ideologies. They want to include minorly attracted persons which is an alias for pedophiles. The danger is, regimes can use this to their advantage and kill anyone who is innocent. However, if used wisely, only the most severe of criminals will be dealt with. I definitely can choose to save them even though they may be evil doers but I will not nor do I have the authority to end lives of human beings who happen to be criminals. It only should be legal to deal with severe criminals who relentlessly want to harm the innocent in society. This includes the criminally insane and the criminally sane who have no remorse in what they have done. After all, some men just want to simply see the world burn. Btw, some women now too have become wicked. Let God prevail near the end!

Side: Yes.
0 points

I always get a laugh at people who are confused on why Pro life people can also support capital punishment.

I guess the difference between mass murderers and innocent lives is a hard concept for some to grasp.

Let me clarify for the millionth time.

Pro life people are pro life for innocent people! We have no problem with the concept of the death penalty for murderers. We understand that the death penalty will for sure stop any chance that this monster could someday murder again, inside or outside of prison.

Side: Yes.
iPhi(239) Disputed
1 point

is it funny ha ha or funny strange? it is an obvious self-contradiction that requires mental gymnastics to rationalize away, i agree.

murder does not require the victim to be "innocent" or "guilty". the premeditated choice to end a human life is murder no matter how you try to lawyer your way out of that logic.

you might FEEL good about murdering a "guilty" person, and protecting an "innocent" person. but your feelings don't matter to facts. the fact is that murder is murder, whether or not you feel "justified" in doing it.

on a sidenote: who is good and who is evil in this world? are you the judge?

if i had given you the death penalty the moment you committed a sin, would you approve of my Judgement...? careful who you throw stones at. you might accidentally hit a sinner

Side: No.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

You are doing what most people against the death penalty do.

You start comparing the act of premeditated murder with other sins that do not deserve the death penalty. You try to conflate two different issues to justify your stance.

If I were to murder a person, I would expect to be executed. We don't have the death penalty for other sins here in America. If we did, I would be against it.

To purposely take another innocent life is the ultimate inhuman thing to do, and deserving of the death penalty.

Obviously there are different types of killing that is not premeditated such as manslaughter, etc. etc.

An intelligent people will make common sense laws that can differentiate between types of murder. I would be fine with death penalty restrictions when there is not 100% positive proof of guilt.

One thing a civilized nation must always do, is lift up the value of innocent life, because when a culture tells the people that viable babies can now be killed, a criminal will justify in his mind that killing anyone after traveling down that birth canal is no worse.

I believe abortion is a very important reason why there is such a lack of respect for life today. We keep seeing these mass killings, as if an innocent human life means nothing.

I will turn the table on you, and say how ludicrous it is for a supposed compassionate people, who can't even bring themselves to execute a mass murderer, to be the very ones having no problem with No Restriction abortions.

So spare us all your phony concern for the right to life of killers.

Side: Yes.
Hitlersmom(38) Disputed
0 points

Shut up poop stick .

Side: No.
Hootie(364) Disputed
0 points

I always get a laugh at people who are confused on why Pro life people can also support capital punishment.

I get the impression that you rock back and forth manically while you're having this laugh.

I guess the difference between mass murderers and innocent lives is a hard concept for some to grasp.

I guess the concept of the legal system making a mistake and accidentally executing innocent people is too hard a concept for you to grasp, moron.

I guess the fact that many of the crack babies you want to force women to carry will inevitably grow up and become mass murderers is too hard a concept for you to grasp too. What if the "innocent life" you save ends up murdering and raping people? Those deaths are on you, you snivelling little coward.

Side: No.
iPhi(239) Clarified
1 point

while i enjoy your humor, your arguments are weak

anecdotal, irrelevant, just plain sloppy. needs work.

Side: Yes.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

Are you glad your mother did not kill you to eliminate any chance you might someday become a killer?

What a total waste of time as always!

IGNORE!

Side: Yes.
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

NOM do i have to show you stupid again ???????????????

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-39578500

Does your Socialist system not want to execute murderers ???????????

Side: Yes.
DTFBD(18) Disputed
0 points

You are a hypocrite. Either it is wrong to kill, or it is not. Make up your mind.

Side: No.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

I have made up my mind! It is wrong to murder an innocent life, and if you do you will be executed for your inhumanity.

Side: Yes.
1 point

Yeah they should be banned or lowered because there are people who have mental illness.

Side: No.
0 points

Thou shall not kill. Even if that person is really really really bad and you feel like they deserve it. If a person is deemed completely useless and a danger to society, you can always just lock him up and throw away the key.

Problem solved. No murder is necessary.

Side: No.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
2 points

You show your total ignorance to the Bible. Where it says Thou shall not kill? It is speaking to murder and taking the life of the innocent. The Bible has absolutely no problem with the death penalty, and speaks of it many times.

Side: Yes.
0 points

Should the death penalty be legal?

Hello i:

Nahhh… I don't think killing people is a good way to teach people NOT to kill people..

excon

Side: No.
Bronto(2002) Disputed
1 point

Sure it is. He didn't kill anyone else. He must have learned his lesson.

Side: Yes.
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Hello i:

Nahhh… I don't think killing people is a good way to teach people NOT to kill people..

excon

Hey STUPOR STUPID you COMPASSIONATE Leftist are not concerned with the victim's families of their loved ones that have been murdered ? I have to say i enjoy showing up on CD and watching the STUPIDITY you IGNORANT SON OF BITCHES type !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Yes.
0 points

Agreed. Prolifers who support the death penalty for any reason are hypocrites.

Side: No.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
0 points

Spoken by a complete phony when it comes to compassion for others.

You would hold midnight vigils to protect a mass murder's right to life, yet you vote for politicians on the Left who have stripped a viable baby's right to life.

DO YOU HAVE ANY CLUE HOW SCREWED UP YOUR THINKING? ANY CLUE AT ALL?

Nah, you are brainwashed into Progressive hypocrisy and self love.

Your priority in life is based on your convenience. Mass murderers do not effect your lifestyle, only others who are murdered.

But after choosing to have sex without birth control, that innocent baby is now an inconvenience to you. KILL IT!

Ok, make a fool of yourself and bring up rapes. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Side: Yes.
-1 points

No. It doesn't work as a deterrent and if authority is allowed to murder people then it undermines the logic of banning murder.

Side: No.
iPhi(239) Clarified
1 point

it is the most effective deterrent for the culprit. and is quite effective at deterring the general public (which is why it is so easy to rationalize). however you are correct that it requires hypocrisy (illogical) in order to enact.

you're getting warmer

Side: Yes.
Amarel(5669) Clarified
0 points

Not all homicide is murder. .

Side: Yes.
Hootie(364) Disputed
2 points

Not all homicide is murder.

Premeditated homicide is murder.

Shut up you partisan hack.

Side: Yes.
iPhi(239) Disputed
1 point

a rose by any other name, would smell as sweet. the problem with delusion is that the human brain can rationalize anything it wants to believe. Reality doesn't care about our feelings.

Side: Yes.