CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
8
Yes No
Debate Score:11
Arguments:14
Total Votes:12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (3)
 
 No (8)

Debate Creator

Srom(12206) pic



Should the leader of Anonymous be charged with hacking related crimes?

Yes

Side Score: 3
VS.

No

Side Score: 8

A crime, is a crime. You can't say "Oh, well he's righteous so it's okay" No! What's stopping him from hacking you, or me, his conscious?

I wont trust his conscious if he's having a bad day. You can't trust his conscious if your opinion of right and wrong differ from his.

He should be charged with those crimes, if they are indeed his, and if h wants to continue that life of work, should join the government rather than fighting some underdog battle just underneath it.

Side: Yes

In my opinion, he should be charged with hacking related crimes.

Side: Yes
0 points

Leader of Anonymous! Funny.

I'm not sure why that made me laugh so much. :)

Anyway.... YES! Charge his ass if the case can be prosecuted. Two wrongs don't make a right and while vigilanties may have a noble cause in many respects, society can't survive long by condoning that sort of thing.

Side: Yes
Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
3 points

for someone saying they were going to leave you sure to spend a lot of time on here.

Side: Yes
ghostheadX(1105) Disputed
1 point

There's probably no leader of Anonymous and there's probably no chance that we'll ever know who that leader is, if they exist. Plus, there are conflicting views about anonymous. I was at an anti-GMO protest. There were some people from Anonymous who help the protestors against GMOs. Not everyone there was part of anonymous but they were our ally and helped us even though we weren't anything like them. Yes, there's the view that they commit crimes but.

There's also the point of view (not everyone there likes anonymous, I mean I think they should be less extreme but) the government is pretty evil. And they do keep secrets from people and conspire to do things, even if you don't believe in 9-11 government conspiracy. There are whole books on it written by William Cooper (not books about Anonymous). There's the perspective that doing nothing to stop the government is just a surrender.

Anonymous believes that they are justice. They come in when they perceive an "injustice." Maybe their perspective is correct. I'm just saying, maybe we should let them rule the internet. Maybe, I'm not even the one who's right to say the bit about ruling the Internet. Who's to say they're wrong or right or what the right answer is? I think their causes are actually pretty good ones, one of which being to free North Korea in one case (example). I don't think that's a bad cause. I think that deleting hundreds of files from a North Korean database is bad because its extreme but there probably should be rebels who fight Kim Jong Un's dictatorship. Also, what about their disrespect for the US government?

Anonymous is anti-GMO. I don't care what you find on the Internet because out of the general few thousand, anti-GMO protestors, there were probably (estimated amount), 50 members of anonymous with masks on. They were supporting a peaceful cause. I mean, they didn't want America under corporate rule or at least wanted healthy food for the masses or they wouldn't have shown up right? I met and talked to them. I didn't see that any people from Anonymous that I met were anything I would really consider evil. They have a slightly different perspective. If I had pictures of this, I'd show you. In fact here's a video. Some of the pictures have members of anonymous in them. Research the cause of anti-GMO protesting. Is that evil?

No, everything is shades of gray.

And you'll probably never know who the leader is. You probably won't know who all the members are, let alone the leader.

I'll even give you a video:

March Against Monsanto Photos
Side: No
Chuz-Life(497) Clarified
0 points

It's creepy that you (or anyone else) would waste the time to post all that as if you thought that it would change what I said above. I said ""if the case can be made and prosecuted"" he / they should be charged.

Nothing you've said changes that.

Side: Yes
1 point

I don't think they have a leader.

Side: No
1 point

Yeah, they can be coordinated, but there really has been no proof of a head-honcho.

Side: No
1 point

No. They expose corruption. .

Side: No

It's hacking fucking computers. Who gives a shit .

Side: No