CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
9
Yes No
Debate Score:13
Arguments:14
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (4)
 
 No (8)

Debate Creator

Srom(12206) pic



Should there be a limit to how many children you can have?

Yes

Side Score: 4
VS.

No

Side Score: 9

Yes, but those whom have amazing genetics will get to have an extra child, because we need more super people and less idiots like myself.

Side: Yes
iNationGirl(28) Disputed
1 point

The world is based upon survival of the fittest. So if by only allowing those with "superior" genetics to reproduce more, in time the inferior genetics will become instinct. Then there will be no "superior", and life can not sustain in equality. It's been proven. There must be big, and there must be small. There must be smart, and there must be dumb. You need both to add balance to the world, otherwise, it doesn't work. You're trying to finish a puzzle with half of the pieces.

Side: No

I agree. We need dumb people to do the grunt work.

Side: No
1 point

"The world is based upon survival of the fittest" How hard do you apply yourself to your statement? There are no perfect people. Only the children of forsaken parents seem to exist and it will keep to obey that system order. Genetics won't influence, it's an exaggeration. - Simple child test. e.g. A mother loves her child, and he learns love. / A mother hates her child, and he learns love. - Even if the mother mistreats him, the child would presume it to be love. And if he would get only fed once a day, he would get used to it as norm. - And it sounded like if it's better if people have love with certain people. Science means evidence, but not like a Holy Bible where the only evidence is that book. You can't decide genetic legacy for everyone.

Side: Yes

I don't see why people are answer no. Because the world is like a house. If it becomes too over crowded, it becomes unpleasant and bothersome.

Side: Yes
iNationGirl(28) Disputed
1 point

Yes, but that is why there is death. To balance out the world - when life is given, another is taken away. It's the circle of life, haven't you heard the song?

Side: No
TheThinker(1697) Disputed
1 point

There is death but this world can still become over crowded if we take the right measures. Like if every woman in the world gave birth to a child in a consistent order, i bet we can make this world too crowded.

Side: Yes
2 points

No. But there should be a limit to how many children you can afford and take care off

Side: No
1 point

In Soviet Russia, baby has you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: No
1 point

Previous attempts to regulate birth rates have had unintended consequences (female infanticide, undocumented children, privileged exceptions, etc.) and encountered obstacles (i.e. if you divorce and remarry whose children limit applies?). Rather than forcibly regulate the number of children someone can have, it makes more sense to address the social pressures contributing to the birth rate.

Side: No

You can not even control how many children people can have just how many births because people would get pregnant with twins, triplets or an other multiple pregnancy.

Side: No

No, everyone has a free choice whether they want to have something done or not!!

Side: No