CreateDebate


Debate Info

17
30
Aw helll yasss No
Debate Score:47
Arguments:25
Total Votes:97
Ended:03/03/18
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Aw helll yasss (8)
 
 No (13)

Debate Creator

American_boy(647) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Should we collectively shame NumberOne?

This is just a question to see what you guys think! It is not me organizing a group to do this!

Aw helll yasss

Side Score: 17
VS.

No

Side Score: 30
Winning Side!
1 point

Should we collectively shame NumberOne

No need , he does it brilliantly himself as his bigotry , racism and stupidity are the stuff of legend

Side: Aw helll yasss
-6 points

I just asked a question because I was curios what others would say.

Side: Aw helll yasss
3 points

Should we collectively shame NumberOne?

Shame?--No

Hold a 'Trial' for particularly disruptive members on the Forum?--Yes

I would argue, there is a need to host a 'trial' for problematic elements by creating a Thread where the charges will be submitted--then a Community conversation will be held, ultimately leading to a vote which will decide whether or not the 'offender' shall receive a suspension, expulsion, or exoneration. Then, if a member is suspended, they should be put on the auto-ban list for newly created debates for an allotted amount of time, call it 'x' (sentencing to be determined). This is a way to self-police the Forum in an efficient, fair manner.

Side: No
3 points

Youโ€™re very charitable X and itโ€™s a credit to you , people like Nom I think should be given three public warnings and then a ban of two weeks , should the behavior continue the ban time should increase to month etc , etc ,

Noms a troll who Iโ€™ve yet to see actually debate on C D he takes every challenge to his โ€œ arguments โ€œ as a personal attack and flies into a rage , very strange behaviour indeed

Side: No
3 points

@Dermot

people like Nom I think should be given three public warnings and then a ban of two weeks , should the behavior continue the ban time should increase to month etc , etc ,

Yes--This is along the lines of what I am thinking. If a member is performing egregious offenses, than another member can create a 'Hearing' Thread, presenting the accusations/charges against them. If a sufficient number of members agree this is in fact occurring, it will proceed to 'Trial'--later a vote and 'Judgement' with potential 'Sentencing'. Repeat offenders will be allotted a certain number of 'fouls' before 'fouling out'--receiving a permanent ban.

Note: WinsonC pioneered this idea by creating a Thread presenting very clear charges and evidence against Quantumhead (aka. Nomenclature) some time ago. This is precisely along the lines of what I am considering, just expanded more. Here is a link to the Thread:

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Quantumhead abusingthesystemwithmorethan8sockaccounts

Side: No
Pennywise(58) Disputed
2 points

If he does not pass a trial of his peers, we should have a mock witch burning.

Side: Aw helll yasss
xMathFanx(1722) Clarified
1 point

. .

Dangers of Public Shame/Humiliation Tactics: Tar & Feather
Side: Aw helll yasss
2 points

I'm not down for collectively shaming anyone.

But let's not forget that number one means pissing.

Side: No
2 points

Why would I do that?....................................................................................................................................................

Side: No
2 points

I know he's not the most intelligent of God's creatures but he is endowed with more than his fair share of animal cunning.

He knows that by swearing at his opponents will detract from their expose' of the weakness of his argument.

So, we should give him enough rope to hang himself.

Side: No
1 point

Just who's "collection" should "we" shame? Yours? Mine? Bronto's? Joline's? This used to be a free country. This is supposed to be an opinion site in an opinion free country. This type of attitude is the type that makes Putin smile ... "It's WORKING"! "Everybody in the U.S. is attacking everybody else! Vodka for everyone!"

Grow up. We have more than one Amendment. Number Two has a number for a reason, Number One also counts .... first!

Side: No
-3 points
-3 points